WuHanXianShi14 0 Share Posted August 10, 2019 5 hours ago, Destroyer_Bravo said: what about 2 mans bro still pretty sleepy to slap a 2d cooldown but waa cant anger the elves too much Pretty sure this was implemented because the elves were the ones raiding lmfao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeypoacher 6993 Share Posted August 10, 2019 >3 people cause trouble in your nation >you invariably outnumber them and choose the rules of engagement via defender default >you need a 2 day cooldown to get rid of them because it “hurts your community” pure crybullying, you hate to see it 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destroyer_Bravo 1052 Share Posted August 10, 2019 1 hour ago, WuHanXianShi14 said: Pretty sure this was implemented because the elves were the ones raiding lmfao as a fellow elf i apologize should have said dark mage or something Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaMoist 1707 Share Posted August 11, 2019 11 hours ago, rotund_man said: you invariably outnumber them and choose the rules of engagement via defender default Llyria actually didn’t get a choice. It was forced pvp 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonslayerelf 653 Share Posted August 11, 2019 2 hours ago, TheAlphaMoist said: Llyria actually didn’t get a choice. It was forced pvp Good. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnsider 4542 Share Posted August 11, 2019 3 hours ago, TheAlphaMoist said: Llyria actually didn’t get a choice. It was forced pvp Telanir was very clear. Nations are not allowed to ignore wars. Yeah, that's forced PvP, but it's necessary to maintain immersion. You can't just say no to a war. That said, I think this new rule is entirely unnecessary. If people were abusing the banditry rules - - and let me be absolutely clear, the new rules declared that 3 people or less is banditry, not a raid - - then the abusers should have been brought up with warnings and then CBs. That's already part of the rules. You don't need to change the rules when you already have a solution for excessive banditry against one target. According to the rules, two things happened. Excessive banditry against a single target in rapid succession. And going against the good faith clause in warclaims by doing the excessive banditry while OOC war negotiations were ongoing (by the aggressors) and by claiming and expecting help from the skygods to save them from PvP (by the defenders). Here is the solution given by the rules (and Telanir's FAQs). Excessive banditry should be addressed by the mods. If the players seem unrepentant, CBs can be issued. Bad faith means that, if mods are called into negotiations, they can leave more heavily on the side of those acting in good faith. Boom, done. No need for new rules. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aiden0023 1374 Share Posted August 13, 2019 On 8/10/2019 at 10:58 AM, Knox said: Basically this. If three men cause such a ruckess to your nation, is it even worth being a nation? You can argue “waah we’re a ******* RP nation!” but ****, anybody who loses a national raid to three people doesn’t deserve to be a nation pvper or not IMHO. Exactly, there is just overall too much whining from everyone on how **** doesn’t go their way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.209a85f5fc63e4cf5308677a0888b830.gif)
Recommended Posts