Jump to content

PRIMUS OECUMENICUS CONSILIUM ALBAROSA - 1804, 357 ES


Draeris
 Share

Recommended Posts

Padre Carlos, the Pontificial Chamberlain  takes a break from arduously commentating on the meetings progression to cast his own voting ballot.

 

I). To receive a mandate to completely overhaul the structuring & typography of the current Canon Law. NAY

 

II). To add a stipulation to Canon Law that makes the (Princely) Archdioceses of Providentia, Jorenus & Albarosa permanent within the Holy Mother Church, in name and in scope. AYE

 

III). To update the definitions in Book II, Title II. Chapter III., expanding the Curia roles currently present & outlining their tasks more concretely. AYE

 

IV). To change in Book IV, Title IV, Chapter III., that only one attributable miracle is necessary for sainthood: as not all current saints have two. AYE

 

V). To add in Book V, Title II, Chapter I that inciting sedition against, questioning the legitimacy of or conspiring to harm the High Pontiff commits a crime and excommunicates himself automatically. AYE

 

VI). To add in Book V, Title II a chapter that describes Papal Briefs. AYE

 

VII). To overhaul Book VI, Title II. Chapter III., rendering Minor Bulls ‘Archdiocesan Decrees’ and further streamlining them with the Golden Bulls of His Holiness. AYE

 

VIII). [REMOVED]

 

IX). To add in BOOK VII, Title I, that the High Pontiff may, on his own accord, assume the role of judge within a trial, and overturn the ruling of a lesser judge with a majority of the cardinals backing such.  NAY

 

X). Although it is within the High Pontiff’s authority to venerate any Canonist at will, His Holiness seeks to gain popular approval for his nominees regardless: 

X.I).Empress Anne the August of Novellen NAY
X.II). His Holiness the High Pontiff James II AYE
X.III). His Holiness the High Pontiff Pontian III AYE
X.IV). Governor-General Richard de Reden NAY
X.V). Vicar Lemuel de Langford NAY

X.VI). Father Pius of Sutica AYE

X.VII). Anton Barclay AYE

 

XI). To beautify
XI.I). Cardinal Erasmus von Getreide of Ves
NAY

XI.II). Queen Viktoria var Ruthern of Haense NAY

 

XII). To beautify, and then proceed to Canonize
XII.I). Andrik ‘I’ Vydra
AYE
XII.II). John of Carnatia  NAY
XII.III). Jasper of Renzfeld AYE

XII.IV). Otto II of Haense NAY

 

XIII). To Canonize, 
XIII.I). Vytenis of Luciensport
AYE
XIII.II). High Pontiff Everard II AYE

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bishop Otho of Valwyck votes:

 

I. NAY

 

II. AYE

 

III. AYE

 

IV. NAY

 

V. AYE

 

VI. AYE

 

VII. AYE

 

VIII. REMOVED

 

IX. AYE

 

XIV. NAY

 

XV. NAY

 

XVI. NAY 

 

XVII. AYE

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curious on why the clergy votes on Basil's proposals, Bishop Otho of Valwyck asked privetly Bishop Benedict @Piov on the matter " Dear teacher, did you ordain Basil earlier than the date that was agreed upon? I find it strange that we vote on his proposals"

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Basil Moroul said:

Brothers, I have a few proposals which I wish to add to this ecumenical council before I respond to the proposals already made by the Pontiff. Firstly I propose that any mention of the punishment of interdiction be removed from canon law. This is because I believe it is immoral and wrong to prevent the clergy from performing canonist rites to specific individuals unless they are excommunicated. I also believe it to be wholly unprofessional and abhorrent to place these measures on entire nations, cities or places due to the sins of their leader. The Holy Mother Church should not restrict its activities and rites given to the canonist populace just because a leader might be a sinful man or woman, it is wrong.

 

Secondly I have recently seen in the most recent papal bull that his Holiness wishes to reinstate tithes and I disagree with this measure to fill up the churches coffers. I propose that any mention of tithes be removed from canon law as it is wrong to tax the faithful simply for doing our God-given duties. I do not preach and spread the word of God in hopes of being paid, and I would pray that my fellow clergy does not do the same. Donations and selling materials in shops is how the church should gather its funds, each diocese should be in charge of its own funds also. We should all follow his Eminence, Cardinal Benedict’s footsteps and activities like the fish fry. I believe it wrong to tax the faithful for being in their cities, because that's what a tithe is - tax.

 

Currently there are no defined laws around the way in which a rebukement of a sitting pontiff may occur and the procedure around it to avoid a pontiff taking retaliatory action against cardinals who would vote to rebuke him. I propose the following is added into canon law under Title II - Constitutional Hierarchy of the Church, in its own chapter.

 

Chapter 6. The Rebukement of a sitting Pontiff

I. In order for the rebukement process to begin the Auditor of the Tribunal must open a public inquiry into the alleged crimes or reasons that may warrant his removal from office. This is an inquiry not a trial

A. Any who wish to provide evidence to an inquiry of rebukement may do so without fear of repercussions or defrockment from a sitting Pontiff

B. A sitting Pontiff can not issue orders barring his clergy or general populace from attending this inquiry or testifying

C. Once the Auditor of the Tribunal has opened a formal inquiry into alleged crimes, or justification for rebukement, the Pontiff may not remove the Auditor until the inquiry and subsequent vote, if it is warranted, is concluded.

D. A sitting Pontiff may not defrock any member of the clergy for testifying at an inquiry.

II. If as a result of an inquiry the Auditor of the Tribunal deems it fit to argue the case for rebukement before the college of cardinals than he may do so freely without preventative measures taken by a sitting Pontiff.

III. If the Auditor of the Tribunal should become ill, incapacitated or die during this process than the Vice-Chancellor will stand in for him.

IV. Once the Auditor of the Tribunal has made his case before the college of cardinals they may vote on whether to rebuke the Pontiff or not, this must be a unanimous decision.

A. If the Auditor of the Tribunal deems it fit that a vote of rebukement must happen then all cardinals are obliged to vote, none can abstain.

B. During the process as the case is presented by the Auditor of the Tribunal and during the vote of rebukement, the Supreme Order of Exalted Owyn must act as a neutral force and guard the proceedings from any who would interrupt.

V. If the vote of rebukement fails than all shall be as before however a sitting Pontiff may not defrock, demote or excommunicate the Auditor of the Tribunal or any member of the college of cardinals for voting disfavorably against a sitting Pontiff.

VI. If the vote of rebukement passes unanimously than the sitting Pontiff must resign his papal throne immediately and may issue no decrees, papal bulls or any writing that would go against the decision taken by the college of cardinals.

A. Once the sitting Pontiff has resigned his seat he will thus be declared Pontiff-Emeritus.

B. After the resignation of the sitting Pontiff the church will declare a state of sede vacante and the college of cardinals will once more convene at the behest of the Auditor of the Tribunal to elect a new Pontiff.

C. The previously sitting Pontiff may not put himself forward for election for the remainder of his life.

C. During the state of sede vacante the authority of the Supreme Order of Exalted Owyn transfers to the Auditor of the Tribunal to ensure a smooth transition of power, once a new Pontiff is elected the authority will return to its holder.

VII. If it is the wish of the Auditor of the Tribunal to begin proceedings for a prosecution for the alleged crimes of the Pontiff-Emeritus, then he may do so

 

My final proposal is for an addition to be made to Canon law that will outlaw the practise of selling indulgences. I do pray that no clergymen may ever fall so far from grace and begin performing this but canon law is universal and prevents any from doing so in the future. I believe the practise of selling indulgences is extremely heretical because it is, in no uncertain words, selling salvation. Salvation can not be bought with coin or conspiracies but with love for God and penance.


 

 

Now that all of my proposals have been made I will reply to the proposals already made by Owyn the third. I shall begin with sections I and II to simply say that these are unnecessary additions to make and have us vote on because no mandate is required to change canon law, an ecumenical council is and his Holiness may call an ecumenical council to reform canon law provided that at least three quarters of the entire clergy are present and cast their vote for or against the proposals made. Also, the names of each diocese usually depends on their location such as Providentia and should not be made permanent. Section III seems interesting though I am most confused why the additions that he intends to make have not been presented to us so before we can vote on this I believe that the changes he will make if this is approved should be shown to us. With section IV I agree with some of my fellow clergymen present, that the criteria for sainthood should not change simply for the sake of change but those saints with only one miracle be deeply evaluated. For the saints with only one miracle we should delve into their history and search for any other miracles that can be attributed to them.

 

Now onto section V of Owyn’s proposals, this one regarding sedition which I find most confusing. I do not see the requirement for this to be added to canon law as there are already laws against sedition and all canonists accused of a crime in canon law should have a right to have a trial and not immediately face excommunication. Excommunication is not a tool that we should use with so little affect. This also sets a dangerous precedent wherein any cardinal who expresses their wish to rebuke any sitting Pontiff or any who vote in favour of rebuking a pontiff might be charged with this crime and face immediate excommunication. This law allows for a sitting Pontiff to punish his cardinals for invoking their right to rebuke a sitting Pontiff and I do not believe this is acceptable as rebukement is very clearly set in canon law. I shall skip section VI, VII and VIII and move straight onto section IX. I believe what is proposed here is very dangerous and shows a great distrust between his Holiness and the judges that hold trials in canon law. His Holiness should trust the abilities and judgement of his judges lest why is there a point in them to begin with. If his Holiness does not wish for his judges to make judgements that are not acceptable to him then why have them to begin with. Judges should act independently and give a fair judgement else the whole trial process is a complete and absolute farce.

After enduring the panicked whispers of an attendant, Ailred stands up to address the Council.

"Having been made aware of the possible invalidity of these proposals, as it appears Basil has not yet been ordained, I echo them to ensure their validity. Naturally, as the proposals remain the same, there is an assumption that each vote on them does too, mine included, unless the voter states otherwise." 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acolyte Basil Morul sits firmly in his seat within the tent filled with chaos and rushed proceedings as the clergymen suddenly begin to make an outcry over his validity and presence at the meeting. Surely somebody had ought to notice his white acolyte vestments when he entered the meeting and put forward his proposals, surely this mistake was simply down to the speedy and chaotic council hurtling forward in time for the Pontiff’s next papal bull. After receiving news that his ordainment was paused for supposedly voting in the council he rose from his seat to address those present.


“Good brothers, I am most confused why there is trouble now, on the final day of this council, for I have been sitting here for several speedy and rowdy days with the rest of you - surely my acolyte robes are a give away to you all. I attended the meeting as I was informed that all members of the church were invited to attend and have their input and put forward proposals for the Pontiff to consider. That is all I did, I put forward four proposals for the Pontiff to consider and he put them forward to be voted on, all fine within canon law under Book 1, Title II, 5.8. I am confused why some of you present are making the claim that I have voted on the proposals presented before us but as you can all see in the tallies I have not, I am thusly unsure why my ordination and progress into the priesthood has been halted for voting when clearly I have not. I do pray that their Graces present are not saying that the opinions of laymen and acolytes are less worthy of merit than their own.”

Edited by Basil Moroul
Link to post
Share on other sites

I). To receive a mandate to completely overhaul the structuring & typography of the current Canon Law. NO

 

II). To add a stipulation to Canon Law that makes the (Princely) Archdioceses of Providentia, Jorenus & Albarosa permanent within the Holy Mother Church, in name and in scope. NO 

 

III). To update the definitions in Book II, Title II. Chapter III., expanding the Curia roles currently present & outlining their tasks more concretely. This involves the addition of the new roles already granted, and to add onto the existing descriptions the de facto tasks of each curia role as well. YES

 

IV). To change in Book IV, Title IV, Chapter III., that only one attributable miracle is necessary for sainthood: as not all current saints have two. NO

 

V). To add in Book V, Title II, Chapter I that inciting sedition against, questioning the legitimacy of or conspiring to harm the High Pontiff commits a crime and excommunicates himself automatically. This would involve a law stipulation that specifies what circumstances would justify such: such as disputing a legitimate election, or inciting violence against the High Pontiff as a person. YES

 

VI). To add in Book V, Title II a chapter that describes Papal Briefs.  YES

 

VII). To overhaul Book VI, Title II. Chapter III., rendering Minor Bulls ‘Archdiocesan Decrees’ and further streamlining them with the Golden Bulls of His Holiness. YES

 

VIII). [REMOVED]

 

IX). To add in BOOK VII, Title I, that the High Pontiff may, on his own accord, assume the role of judge within a trial, and overturn the ruling of a lesser judge with a majority of the cardinals backing such. This would require prior approval from the College of Cardinals and should principally be only used in severely important procedures. NO

 

X). Although it is within the High Pontiff’s authority to venerate any Canonist at will, His Holiness seeks to gain popular approval for his nominees regardless: 

X.I).Empress Anne the August of Novellen YES
X.II). His Holiness the High Pontiff James II YES
X.III). His Holiness the High Pontiff Pontian III YES
X.IV). Governor-General Richard de Reden NO
X.V). Vicar Lemuel de Langford NO

X.VI). Father Pius of Sutica YES

X.VII). Anton Barclay YES

 

XI). To beautify
XI.I). Cardinal Erasmus von Getreide of Ves
NO, suggests he be made venerable

XI.II). Queen Viktoria var Ruthern of Haense NO

 

XII). To beautify, and then proceed to Canonize
XII.I). Andrik ‘I’ Vydra
NAY
XII.II). John of Carnatia NAY
XII.III). Jasper of Renzfeld AYE

XII.IV). Otto II of Haense AYE

 

XIII). To Canonize, 
XIII.I). Vytenis of Luciensport
NAY
XIII.II). High Pontiff Everard II AYE

Edited by GoldWolfGaming
Link to post
Share on other sites

I). To receive a mandate to completely overhaul the structuring & typography of the current Canon Law.

Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

II). To add a stipulation to Canon Law that makes the (Princely) Archdioceses of Providentia, Jorenus & Albarosa permanent within the Holy Mother Church, in name and in scope.

Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

III). To update the definitions in Book II, Title II. Chapter III., expanding the Curia roles currently present & outlining their tasks more concretely. This involves the addition of the new roles already granted, and to add onto the existing descriptions the de facto tasks of each curia role as well.

Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

IV). To change in Book IV, Title IV, Chapter III., that only one attributable miracle is necessary for sainthood: as not all current saints have two.

Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

V). To add in Book V, Title II, Chapter I that inciting sedition against, questioning the legitimacy of or conspiring to harm the High Pontiff commits a crime and excommunicates himself automatically. This would involve a law stipulation that specifies what circumstances would justify such: such as disputing a legitimate election, or inciting violence against the High Pontiff as a person.

Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

VI). To add in Book V, Title II a chapter that describes Papal Briefs. Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

VII). To overhaul Book VI, Title II. Chapter III., rendering Minor Bulls ‘Archdiocesan Decrees’ and further streamlining them with the Golden Bulls of His Holiness.

Jan Istvan Tibor votes Aye

 

VIII). [REMOVED]

 

IX). To add in BOOK VII, Title I, that the High Pontiff may, on his own accord, assume the role of judge within a trial, and overturn the ruling of a lesser judge with a majority of the cardinals backing such. This would require prior approval from the College of Cardinals and should principally be only used in severely important procedures. Jan Istvan

Tibor votes Aye Jan Istvan Tibor votes

 

Nay on XIV, XV, XVI & XVI

Edited by Wurfv
Link to post
Share on other sites

Owyn III presents the final tally, closing the council.

 

I). To receive a mandate to completely overhaul the structuring & typography of the current Canon Law. REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Karl Kortrevich

ABSTAIN:

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Cyril Halcourt

Father Carlos of Hyspia

 

II). To add a stipulation to Canon Law that makes the (Princely) Archdioceses of Providentia, Jorenus & Albarosa permanent within the Holy Mother Church, in name and in scope. PASSED BY COUNCIL. 3/4 MAJORITY ACHIEVED.

AYE:

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Cyril Halcourt

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

 

III). To update the definitions in Book II, Title II. Chapter III., expanding the Curia roles currently present & outlining their tasks more concretely. This involves the addition of the new roles already granted, and to add onto the existing descriptions the de facto tasks of each curia role as well.  REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Cyril Halcourt

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

 

IV). To change in Book IV, Title IV, Chapter III., that only one attributable miracle is necessary for sainthood: as not all current saints have two.  REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Cyril Halcourt

 

V). To add in Book V, Title II, Chapter I that inciting sedition against, questioning the legitimacy of or conspiring to harm the High Pontiff commits a crime and excommunicates himself automatically. This would involve a law stipulation that specifies what circumstances would justify such: such as disputing a legitimate election, or inciting violence against the High Pontiff as a person.   REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Cyril Halcourt

 

VI). To add in Book V, Title II a chapter that describes Papal Briefs. PASSED BY COUNCIL. 3/4 MAJORITY ACHIEVED.

AYE:

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Cyril Halcourt

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

 

VII). To overhaul Book VI, Title II. Chapter III., rendering Minor Bulls ‘Archdiocesan Decrees’ and further streamlining them with the Golden Bulls of His Holiness. PASSED BY COUNCIL. 3/4 MAJORITY ACHIEVED.

AYE:

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Cyril Halcourt

 

VIII). [REMOVED]

 

IX). To add in BOOK VII, Title I, that the High Pontiff may, on his own accord, assume the role of judge within a trial, and overturn the ruling of a lesser judge with a majority of the cardinals backing such. This would require prior approval from the College of Cardinals and should principally be only used in severely important procedures. REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Otho Episcopus Valwyck

Abbot Antonius Mihailo Visconti

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Monsignor Robert de Bourdon

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Jan Istvan Tibor

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Vicary Episcopus Rochefort

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Cyril Halcourt

Father Carlos of Hyspia

 

XIV). Basil's proposal to remove interdiction REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Father Cyril Halcourt

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

 

XV). Basil's proposal for tithes REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Cyril Halcourt

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

 

XVI). Basil's proposal for new laws pertaining to the rebuking of the High Pontiff. REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Cyril Halcourt

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Jan Istvan Tibor

ABSTAIN:

Father Karl Kortrevich

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

 

XVII). Basil's proposal pertaining to indulgences. REJECTED BY COUNCIL - NO 3/4 MAJORITY

AYE:

Father Dima Carrion-Tyuvic

Javier Franscisco Altamarino

NAY:

Sanctitas Pontifex Maximus Owyn III

Father Lajos Sandor Károly

Alfred Episcopus Henrikev

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Francisco Episcopus Hyspia

Adelric Episcopus Esbec

Father Karl Kortrevich

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Father Cyril Halcourt

Father Carlos of Hyspia

Jan Istvan Tibor

 

----CARDINALS ONLY VOTE----

X). Although it is within the High Pontiff’s authority to venerate any Canonist at will, His Holiness seeks to gain popular approval for his nominees regardless: 

X.I).Empress Anne the August of Novellen REJECTED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia


X.II). His Holiness the High Pontiff James II PASSED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia


X.III). His Holiness the High Pontiff Pontian III PASSED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia


X.IV). Governor-General Richard de Reden REJECTED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

NAY:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia


X.V). Vicar Lemuel de Langford REJECTED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

NAY:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

X.VI). Father Pius of Sutica PASSED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

X.VII). Anton Barclay PASSED BY POPULAR VOTE, DECISION FOR PONTIFF

AYE:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

XI). To beautify
XI.I). Cardinal Erasmus von Getreide of Ves [UNDECIDED]

AYE:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

XI.II). Queen Viktoria var Ruthern of Haense [REMOVED]

 

XI.III). Krisztián Cardinalis Ves [UNDECIDED]

AYE:

NAY:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

XI.IV). Queen Maya of Muldav REJECTED

AYE:

NAY:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

XII). To beautify, and then proceed to Canonize
XII.I). Andrik ‘I’ Vydra 
PASSED

AYE:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

NAY:

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

 

XII.II). John of Carnatia REJECTED

AYE:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

NAY:

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia


XII.III). Jasper of Renzfeld [Withdrawn, discussion pending].

-

 

XII.IV). Otto II of Haense [Withdrawn, discussion pending].

-

 

XIII). To Canonize, 
XIII.I). Vytenis of Luciensport 
[Withdrawn, discussion pending].

-


XIII.II). High Pontiff Everard II  PASSED

AYE:

Benedict Cardinalis Jorenus

Pelagius Cardinalis Albarosa

Ailred Cardinalis Reinmar

Manfried Cardinalis Providentia

ABSTAIN: 

Amadeus Cardinalis Nescia

Edited by Draeris
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...