Jump to content

The Judicial Gazette of the Aulic Court


Recommended Posts

VE VASRICHEV KAZET I VE WICACZJOEST

The Judicial Gazette of the Aulic Court

 

kWz3D4y18UGIinXs_nO9Pe-uFkUyZQkB2te6xnuXr4XdCJioOFCJPWL7ZnKvt6Djhbr9JWqK7YDAQsbO0OXotkvIqKmK9Kgvyq1V-5572uWnORbPNiPdKcDQAESp-qtquimWdzQY

 

"MONN JOESTIY OE VASR AG RICACZ."

Motto of the Aulic Court

‘May our Judgement be Just and Right’

 


 

The Judicial Gazette of the Aulic Court (Naumariav: Ve Vasrichev Kazet i ve Wicaczjoest) serves as a publicly available record for all the subjects of the Crown of Hanseti-Ruska, in which they may find all that pertains to the Aulic Court, such as a list of past and present Jovenaar, a list of all rulings made by the Aulic Court, all legal reviews by the Aulic Court, and Judicial Philosophies. This Gazette was created in 366 by Jovenaar Lauritz F. Jensen, based on the Aulic Court’s core belief that for justice to be fair and equal, it must also be transparent and available to all.

 

Jovenaar:

Mister Lukas Rakoczy (351 - Present) [Pureimp10]

Appointed by Josef I in 351.

 

Lady Erika L. Kortrevich (355 - Present) [sirenssong__]

Appointed by Josef I in 355.

 

Mister Lauritz F. Jensen (365 - Present) [gusanoarentonio]

Appointed by Henrik I in 365.

 

Sir Konstantin Wick HKML (367 - Present) [Xarkly]

Appointed by Henrik I in 367.

 

Mister Feodor May (379 - Present) [SanderWarrior14]

Appointed by Henrik I in 379.

 

Lord Hieromar T. Kortrevich (382 - Present) [Zanthuz]

Appointed by Henrik I in 382.

 

Prinzenas Vasilia K. Morovar (382 - Present) [yandeer]

Appointed by Henrik I in 382.

 

Past Jovenaar:

Mister Otto Wittenbach (345 - 365) [EtowTheSaltyCat]

Appointed by Josef I in 345, retired in 365.

 

Sir Sigmar J. Baruch HKML (342 - 367) [DrewDOOD]

Appointed by Josef I in 342, died in 367.

 

Miss Reza B. Gynsburg (345 - 373) [Piov]

Appointed by Josef I in 345, died in 373.

 

Miss Eleanora A. Mannox (367 - 373) [MikoMonster]

Appointed by Henrik I in 367, retired in 373.

 

HRM Koenas-Zweimdr Annika A. Vyronov (367 - 376) [Madyyy]

Appointed by Henrik I in 367, retired in 376.

 

Rulings:

Krawn z. Boniface, 343:

Presiding Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch.

Prosecution: Lauritz Christiansen.
Defendant: Boniface.

Verdict: Guilty of heresy and blasphemy.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Krawn z. Gelderhode, 346:

Presiding Jovenaar: Reza B. Ginsburg.

Assistant Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch.

Prosecution: Osvald A. Barclay.

Defendant: Mikael van Gelderhode.
Verdict: Guilty of assault, banditry, and obstruction of justice.

Sentence: Sentenced to removal of a limb.

 

Krawn z. Stafyr, 347:

Presiding Jovenaar: Otto Wittenbach

Assistant Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg, Sigmar J. Baruch.

Prosecution: Eleanora Mannox.

Defendant: Hektor Stafyr.

Verdict: Guilty of sedition and defamation.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Krawn z. Helvets, 355:

Presiding Jovenaar: Lukas Rakoczy.

Assistant Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Erika L. Kortrevich.

Prosecution: Matyas Baruch.

Defendant: Richard V. Helvets.

Verdict: Guilty of attempted murder.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Krawn z. Kovachev, 356:

Presiding Jovenaar: Lukas Rakoczy.

Assistant Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Reza B. Gynsburg.

Prosecution: Matyas Baruch.

Defendant: Sergey Kovachev.

Verdict: Guilty of harm to the Crown and assault.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Krawn z. Bernard, et al, 358:

Presiding Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg.

Assistant Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Erika L. Kortrevich.

Prosecution: Matyas Baruch.

Defendants: Bernard, Arvedth, and Renault.

Verdict: Guilty of grand theft, not guilty of banditry.

Sentence: Sentenced to branding of a limb.

 

Krawn z. Black Crow, 360:

Presiding Jovenaar: Lukas Rakoczy.

Assistant Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg, Erika L. Kortrevich.

Prosecution: Matyas Baruch.

Defendants: Gustaven van Halsfield, and all members of the Black Crow.

Verdict: Guilty of founding (or membership of) a criminal organization.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Krawn z. Sarkozy, 367:

Presiding Jovenaar: Lukas Rakoczy.

Assistant Jovenaar: Lauritz F. Jensen, Annika A. Vyronov.

Prosecution: Maric Ruthern.

Defendant: Irene Sarkozy.

Verdict: Guilty of attempted murder and attempted regicide.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Krawn z. Ruthern, 367:

Presiding Jovenaar: Eleanora A. Mannox.

Assistant Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg, Erika L. Kortrevich.

Prosecution: Matyas Baruch.

Defendant: Alric Ruthern.

Verdict: Guilty of assault.

Sentence: Sentenced to branding.

 

Ruthern z. Wick, 369:

Presiding Jovenaar: Erika L. Kortrevich.

Assistant Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg, Annika A. Vyronov.

Plaintiff: Aldrik Baruch.

Defendant: Konstantin Wick.

Verdict: Not guilty.

 

Krawn z. Matthieu, 370:

Presiding Jovenaar: Erika L. Kortrevich.

Assistant Jovenaar: Lauritz F. Jensen, Annika A. Vyronov.

Prosecution: Tatiana Ruthern.

Defendant: Matthieu.

Verdict: Guilty of murder and harm to the crown.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Baruch, et al. z. Surgeon-General, 370:

Presiding Jovenaar: Lauritz F. Jensen.

Assistant Jovenaar: Erika L. Kortrevich, Annika A. Vyronov.

Plaintiff: Aldrik Baruch.

Defendant: Aestenia Aevaris.

Verdict: Guilty of tort in regards to Matyas Baruch, not guilty of tort in regards to Viktor Rauen.

Sentence: Sentenced to pay damages of 1500 mina to Ruslan Baruch.

 

Krawn z. Leon, 382:

Presiding Jovenaar: Lukas Rakoczy.

Assistant Jovenaar: Lauritz F. Jensen, Hieromar T. Kortrevich.

Prosecution: Casimir Colborn.

Defendant: Leon.

Verdict: Guilty of murder and attempted harm to the crown.

Sentence: Sentenced to death.

 

Legal Reviews:

Review on the Relationship between the Royal Duma and the Haeseni Royal Army, 344:

Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Reza B. Gynsburg, Otto Wittenbach.

Majority: Gynsburg, joined by Baruch and Wittenbach.

Concurrence: N/A

Dissent: N/A

Opinion: That the Haeseni Royal Army serves two separate roles, that of domestic law enforcement and that of a military. And that the legislation of the Royal Duma only impacts the Haeseni Royal Army as a law enforcement entity, and therefore does not impede the “operation or composition” of the Haeseni Royal Army as a military entity.

 

Review on the Relationship between the Royal Duma and the Aulic Government, 352:

Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Reza B. Gynsburg, Otto Wittenbach, Lukas Rakoczy.

Majority: Gynsburg, joined by Wittenbach.

Concurrence: Baruch, Rakoczy.

Dissent: N/A

Opinion: That the Duma does not have the legislative power to legislate on itself or the Aulic Government, as both of these entities were created by Royal Edict, and past precedents have set that these be amended only by Royal Prerogative. Therefore, allowing the Duma to legislate on itself and the Aulic Government would contradict and undermine the authority of the Crown.

 

Review on the Legislative Process of Repeating Proposals, 355:

Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Reza B. Gynsburg, Otto Wittenbach, Lukas Rakoczy.

Majority: Rakoczy, joined by Gynsburg.

Concurrence: Wittenbach.

Dissent: Baruch.

Opinion: That a failed piece of legislation may not be re-introduced within the same four-year Duma Period without significant modifications to the legislation. As the Members of the Duma represent the people, a bill that fails does not have support of the people, and allowing the reintroduction of such failed bills would subvert the will of the People.

 

Review on the Composition of Trials, 358:

Jovenaar: Sigmar J. Baruch, Reza B. Gynsburg, Otto Wittenbach, Lukas Rakoczy, Erika L. Kortrevich.

Majority: Kortevich, joined by Baruch, Gynsburg, Wittenbach, and Rakoczy.

Concurrence: N/A

Dissent: N/A

Opinion: That no one but the Crown should have the authority to deem a person guilty on their own accord, and that the current composition of trials, in which three Jovenaar must be present, must be maintained to ensure that all trials are fair and just.

 

Review on the Nobility’s Right to Personal Guards, 367:

Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg, Lukas Rakoczy, Erika L. Kortevich, Lauritz F. Jensen, Annika A. Vyronov.

Majority: Jensen, joined by Rakoczy and Kortrevich.

Concurrence: Gynsburg, Vyronov.

Dissent: N/A

Opinion: That the term “armsmen” does not refer to the rank of Armsman within the Haeseni Royal Army, as there are no prior references to the structure of the Haeseni Royal Army. And that the Haeseni Peer and their noble kin are, as a whole, entitled to two personal guards.

 

Review on the Eligibility of Regents to run in Elections, 371:

Jovenaar: Reza B. Gynsburg, Lukas Rakoczy, Erika L. Kortevich, Lauritz F. Jensen, Annika A. Vyronov, Eleanora A. Mannox, Konstantin Wick.

Majority: Jensen, joined by Kortrevich and Vyronov.

Concurrence: Gynsburg.

Dissent: Rakoczy, Wick and Mannox.

Opinion: That a regent cannot run for the office of Alderman during their tenure as regent of a noble peer, as there would be a conflict between the duties of a Regent and the duty of the Alderman, as regents are principally obliged to attend all Duma sessions on behalf of the titled peer they hold regency over.

 

Judicial Philosophies:

Functionalism:

Derived from: The Living Law, 343.

Authored by: Reza B. Gynsburg.

Summary: Legal Functionalism, or simply functionalism, is a view of the law most concerned with defining the function of law to address dynamic social changes. The law is interpreted with an adaptation that allows for its meaning to transcend original intent so as to address aspects of law not explicit to the text. Adherents of this view believe the Haurul Caezk must actively shift beyond original intent with the context and values of society of their particular time in mind.

 

Originalism:

Derived from: The Originalist Interpretation, 343.

Authored by: Sigmar J. Baruch.

Summary: Originalism is a strictly textualist view, which holds the wording and phrasing to be paramount to the law. If something is not mentioned in the law, then it is not part of the law, whether the morality of it can be questioned or not, something is not a crime if the law does not say it is. Likewise, the originalist would interpret the law exactly as written in the Haurul Caezk, and put it in the context of the meaning intended by the original authors.

Edited by Kingdom of Haense
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...