Jump to content

Letter to the Royal Duma: The Haurul Caezk


Xarkly
 Share

Recommended Posts

Letter to the Royal Duma:

THE HAURUL CAEZK

Q84nJGgD42zISMNtriOPUDvaSPCusVhI2nhqcgN65sTlVNfPSZSt-Gi1FgMgLXVfYFYOoSb-c2fE8Zir0KQAygx9muhDG9Zdlho0aDxkApATRoftj0ROF9UVvQAPzyiqKVqyvokp=s0

 

KRUSAE ZWY KONGZEM

 

Issued by the

CROWN

On this 11th day of Tov and Yermey of 393ES


 

VA BIRODEO HERZENAV AG ALDYLEVAR

 

More than half a century has passed since the Haurul Caezk was published in haste by the Aulic Government of Koeng Josef I following the Kongzem's abrupt separation from the Holy Orenian Empire. At its inception, the Haurul Caezk was a lawbook largely inspired by Orenian law that had been in effect in Haense up until independence, and the haste of its authors in publishing it to provide the Kongzem with a functioning set of laws left little room for Haeseni ideals, culture, and spirit. Since then, the Haurul Caezk - already a lengthy lawbook at its publishing - has grown tremendously with Bills of varying quality. Today, a Haeseni would have to devote much of their life to the study of the lawbook in order to properly understand it.

 

The Crown thinks this neither proper of the Haeseni spirit, nor suitable for the use of the Haeseni people. As such, the Crown asks the Royal Duma to debate the following across the Sittings to come:

 

  • Is the Haurul Caezk suitable for modern Haense?: Are its provisions too lengthy, too Orenian in identity, and do they accurately reflect Haeseni ideals?
     
  • Is the Haurul Caezk practical?: Can its provisions can understood by the average citizen? Does it force a citizen to seek out a jurist just to digest the law?
     
  • Is the Aulic Court fit for purpose?: In light of the above considerations, what then is the place of the Aulic Court, the Justiciar, and the Jovenaars? Are trials too lengthy, and too bureaucratic? Is there a possibility of a Haeseni trial grounded in culture and unique elements?

 

The Crown does not expect the Royal Duma to answer all these questions in one Sitting, and instead advises the Duma to consider these points throughout the reminder of the XXXIII Session.

 

 

IV JOVEO MAAN

His Royal Majesty SIGISMUND III by the Grace of Godan, King of Hanseti and Ruska, Grand Hetman of the Army, Prince of Bihar, Dules, Lahy, Muldav, Solvesborg, Slesvik and Ulgaard, Duke of Carnatia, Margrave of Korstadt, Rothswald and Vasiland, Count of Alban, Alimar, Baranya, Graiswald, Karikhov, Karovia, Kaunas, Kavat, Kovachgrad, Kvasz, Markev, Nenzing, Torun, and Toruv, Viscount of Varna, Baron of Esenstadt, Kraken’s Watch, Kralta, Krepost, Lorentz, Rytsburg, Thurant, Venzia and Astfield, Lord of the Westfolk, Protector of the Highlanders, etcetera.

guJWEFig9-xvch576w6wpOZ8cpfEl3S3zkmGhwPCS2Cd4p1lquZtMeit-2ucxdSkFHlkUN938evO3mXK19EJv4Qc5xNHSpPXjpev_VUfSMsx1ERPfD8FEfS3kiLJT_MKuYhPx0Nd=s0

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...