The King Of The Moon 5119 Share Posted January 15, 2023 I would like for the following redline to be added to the current Rite of Restraints (enthrallment) lore:-A silit cannot FTB nor romantically engage with any individual presently enthralled beyond Stage 1, regardless of if they are enthralled by themselves or any other silit. This was an oversight on our part when siliti lore was originally written. As it stands in the current lore, the redlines (spoilered below) safeguard against enthrallment being used for unsavoury interactions that might bring the likes of Terms of Service into question, though do not account for what in my view appears to be a loophole in the lore which - 'tasteful' or not - can be used in a bad faith fashion that I do not believe any healthy roleplay can arise from. Spoiler That is to say, as it stands in current lore the redlines at present do not fully insure against oddities that may spawn from a silit having another silit enthrall a love interest on their behalf. Even if as written that individual couldn't directly coax a thrall into FTBing, when dealing with someone who is mentally enslaved by the peer of a potential love interest obviously the lines become blurred when bigger questions like in character consent are brought up. This is not something I think we can accept in our community. I should add that at first glance this redline may evoke the question 'how is a silit meant to know someone is a thrall and steer clear?' To which I should reaffirm that siliti are already capable of passively sensing thralls belonging both to themselves and other siliti with the current lore (spoilered below). Spoiler 24 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werew0lf 12005 Share Posted January 15, 2023 holy shitteru make me siliti 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScreamingDingo 16798 Share Posted January 15, 2023 Utilised this exact same redline with the Striga Enthrallment piece since it's always really weird territory of doing that to people when they're not functionable from an ooc point of view good shit 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
satinkira 5800 Share Posted January 16, 2023 yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Songwitch 1438 Share Posted April 14, 2023 Amendments/Additions implemented into main lore post. Thank you for your submission. Moving to correct subforum to prevent redundancy and clutter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts