Jump to content

The Verdict of the Case of Thalgrim Goldhand


Recommended Posts

-TSi8JXdcWFnrFCUiYih9lhgOPX8fWXMYXzoi8wi4Vcv5UYuyN6KwKqj3Ik1Tg3Uqxb13jRHoDTXDyREctrLxp79ZmNyoCLQvuhNnlZ22Skr54qJzoGjnD6fRsb0OmLrErkAQXhP

[12th of First Seed, 118 S.A.]

[March 3rd, 2023]

 


ᚠᚱᛟᛗ ᛏᚺᛖ ᛟᚠᚠᛁᚲᛖ ᛟᚠ ᛏᚺᛖ ᛚᛟᚱᛞ ᛃᚢᛋᛏᛁᚲᛁᚨᚱ

The Verdict of the Case of Thalgrim Goldhand

ᛏᚺᛖ ᚲᚨᛋᛖ ᛟᚠ ᛏᚺᚨᛚᚷᚱᛁᛗ ᚷᛟᛚᛞᚺᚨᚾᛞ

 


 

The court would also like to announce a verdict declared on accusations made and investigated regarding Thalgrim Goldhand’s failure to protect his fellow dwed, namely the Grand King. As such we have made a verdict on the following:

 

Section VII.IV: Insubordination in the Third Degree, by his failure to protect his Grand King or signal for help in any way when visibly attacked.

 

We have found the defendant to be Guilty. However, the court finds that the superfluous nature of the punishment administered by Bakir Ireheart to have been far greater than that of the crime committed. As such, we shall seek no further punishment.

 

Should the Defendant seek to provide a defense for this a trial can and will be held, though it is of the court’s opinion that such is unnecessary as the matter has already been resolved

 

 

 


 

 

Signed,

 

_2WZRpRzuScy6tnSLfmfw2WZyHGWJbEJQRM56cJdsamBXGaQtFdEJ-w-sHP7VEJoh6k1MwUnfw3kM6QaXQHOMROB1yJ7kHWtPSRN_he_ds90JmqGYr30ZBijMXpR2kWw56OUN59WrlBLWVt_1UGxNo8

Lord Justiciar of Urguan


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"So basically it's not treason to just LEAVE the Grand King without support during a terrorist attack? Gotcha." The same injured and unbiased dwarf commented 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Oi left while the king wos in danger, should oi be trialed tuu?" Asks a dwarf

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...