Jump to content

Dimitri_P

Member
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dimitri_P

  1. Well, what’s your name?

    Antonius Cinhil, sir.

    Aye. And from whence do you hail?

    Helena, sir.

    Alright, alright, that’s a fine place this time of season. How many years have you lived?

    Seventeen in total, soon to be eighteen.

    Got it. Your ethnicity, good man? I can’t make it out.

    Heartlander, sir.

    Mmm. I never would have expected it. Are you literate?

    Of course, self taught.

    Good, that won’t hurt you. Do you have a wife at home, or children?

    Not at all, sir.

    They call Sixtus the Third ‘the Lewd’ for having two bastards. Don’t be like him. Have you got anything against taking oaths?

    I’ve no issue against oaths, as long as they are just.

    You’re all set. I’ll have this filed away to the Prelate at once. He’s all the way off in Pembroke, at least a day’s trip. Give him a while.

  2. Banditry should be allowed, as long as it provides meaningful rp between both parties involved, and not just kill someone and take everything on them. When that occurs, it’s simply not fun for the party that gets killed. I’ve had experience with good banditry and bad banditry, and when the rp is good with bandits, I don’t mind handing over some loot, or even getting injured. But when it’s just kill and take loot, and little to no rp is involved, that is when it becomes boring, and borderline frustrating.

  3. 1 minute ago, Telanir said:

     

    Oh, I should mention this point—both NL’s and our own research pretty much brings us to one conclusion. Wars bring a lot of people to log on—but once the war is spent they burn out and vanish for weeks or months at a time. It’s hard on the people involved, especially leadership, and the toxicity and pressure really gets to them. We’ve studied the wars in LotC history that worked with mutual cooperation between the nations, and everyone came out on top and had a good time. Since the conflict was founded in RP and not OOC, nobody came out to deliberately upset each other. This is our ultimate goal, and the new meta for wars. Negotiating fair terms and offering something the other side will want from you.

     

    Nations who prefer active combat and PvP can negotiate free-for-all raids, weekly warclaims, and anything else that interests them. Nations who prefer an alternative form of conflict can negotiate their own terms. The system behind the rules is dynamic in the truest sense of the word.

     

    Could you please clarify whether or not a nation can simply deny all wars or raids, as I think it’s implied both nations have to be willing from now on? Unless I misread that, but could you clarify please, just so we know for sure.

  4. 2 minutes ago, L0rdLawyer said:

    Have you ever been in a roleplay fight with 10 people. When we ignore magic. 10 people say in a 5 v 5 swords is so complicated and hard to follow because of player greed, pging, and just no knowledge how combat actually works its chaos. Throw in one or two mages and it gets so much worse. 

     

    Roleplay fighting is fine for 4 people. Get to 10 or above and it's not. 

     

    That's why raids are pvp. That's why warclaims are pvp. 

    That’s true, I didn’t think of that. It sounds a lot better in concept, but in practice it would probably be extremely messy. I wish everyone could play fairly, but I’m not sure that could happen, people will always try to make themselves win, even if it doesn’t make sense.

  5.  

    2 minutes ago, LaffenOutLoud said:

    I like to hear how the staff is gearing to raids to be more rp-esque and purposeful IRP, and a suggestion to further develop that is to allow the defender of a raid to call RP default instead of MC mechanics default, just as you can call RP default when being banditted – Since just anyone would be able to raid now. 

     

    I like that idea a lot, it would be much more fun if raids were like that.

  6. The main concern I have with this is from what I gather a nation can simply deny all wars or raids OOC, which doesn’t make sense if the nation truly has done things that would warrant a war, unless I’m reading this wrong. Is this the case, and if so, are you sticking to that as the final decision?

  7. A parchment is tacked in response,

     

    “This couldn’t be farther from the truth. I will go over each point, though it may be hasty. Firstly, I do most of the gate watch in Ves, and I have done nothing but allow people to enter. All I require from them is small amounts of information to write in my log book.

     

    Any listening done by the Caer Bann company was of suspected spies or extremely suspicious persons, to ensure nothing of treason is being plotted. Any laws we enforce are strictly done in alignment with the ‘Criminal Codices of The Golden City of Ves’,  the official laws of Ves. Anyone killed in Ves by the company was either a direct threat to the city, or one of the criminals connected with the Drumm Coup. No citizen or foreigner alike would be denied basic rights.

     

    I have no say in the supposed ‘blocking of the city’ as I was not present for such event, if it even did occur.

     

    Searches were done right after the second time the criminals came into the city, everyone in the company was on high alert and we wished to ensure nothing else would happen, no searches have been performed since, with the exception of extremely suspicious individuals.

     

    There is no tyranny, no prisoners, and we are most definitely not bandits in any manner.

     

    I would highly advise you to try and think of better excuses to slander a company and the man who hired them in the future, you only make yourself seem less credible. I in fact do recall I was on gate service when you started screaming insults at us at the top of your lungs, which made you seem crazy to be quite honest. However if you do have some actual concerns with things that are currently happening, please do not hesitate to speak with our higher ups.

     

    Posting this publicly when none of these claims are true is borderline defamation, and make you seem like you are begging for attention, fabricating issues when there are none.

     

    If you have any questions or complaints regarding this response or things you think I’ve misspoken on, feel free to search me out, it’s not difficult, as I will be in Ves most of the time.

     

    Regards,

    Albion,

    Footman of the Caer Bann Company.”

  8. **MC Names of all involved**

    MC Name: Dmitri_Peskratov

     

    **Description**
    I joined the server for the first time yesterday, and got a message saying I could vote for the server for rewards and milestone progress, etc. I went to vote on all the websites given after typing /vote, made sure to spell my Minecraft username right, and I did not get anything.


    **Date of occurance**
    Yesterday, June 16th, 2019 at around 6 or 7 PM, I cannot recall the exact time.

    **In game specifications**
    I was on my only current persona, Albion.


    **Steps to Reproduce**
    <!--- Provide all the steps necessary to reproduce the problem -->
    1. Step 1- I did /vote
    2. Step 2- Clicked the links given for each website to vote
    3. Step 3- Vote on each website, and typed in my username
    4. Step 4- Go back in game to see if I received anything, and I did not.


    **Expected Behavior**
    I’m not sure what exactly is supposed to happen, I think you get bread or milestone progress, but I’m sure it didn’t work as I received multiple more notifications throughout my playtime later telling me I hadn’t voted, although I had.


    **Actual Behavior**
    I did not receive anything, and messages kept coming up telling me to vote, saying I hadn’t.


    **Additional Information**
    Maybe it’s because I’m new, I’m really not sure. All the websites said I had successfully voted, however.


    **Error Message**
    N/A

×
×
  • Create New...