Jump to content

Dimitri_P

Member
  • Content Count

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

69 Fantastic

3 Followers

About Dimitri_P

  • Rank
    Newly Spawned

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Dimitri#1911
  • Minecraft Username
    Dimitri_Pesk

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. bro wtf pkdon1!!!!!! ur gonna make me cry … 😞
  2. Wtf this canot be true ? I cannot believ this Im actualy am shaking in my boots what the fri**ck????????? Ban imediatly! ?
  3. Well, what’s your name? Antonius Cinhil, sir. Aye. And from whence do you hail? Helena, sir. Alright, alright, that’s a fine place this time of season. How many years have you lived? Seventeen in total, soon to be eighteen. Got it. Your ethnicity, good man? I can’t make it out. Heartlander, sir. Mmm. I never would have expected it. Are you literate? Of course, self taught. Good, that won’t hurt you. Do you have a wife at home, or children? Not at all, sir. They call Sixtus the Third ‘the Lewd’ for having two bastards. Don’t be like him. Have you got anything against taking oaths? I’ve no issue against oaths, as long as they are just. You’re all set. I’ll have this filed away to the Prelate at once. He’s all the way off in Pembroke, at least a day’s trip. Give him a while.
  4. New member, zero rep, no pfp.. 10/10 ily
  5. Banditry should be allowed, as long as it provides meaningful rp between both parties involved, and not just kill someone and take everything on them. When that occurs, it’s simply not fun for the party that gets killed. I’ve had experience with good banditry and bad banditry, and when the rp is good with bandits, I don’t mind handing over some loot, or even getting injured. But when it’s just kill and take loot, and little to no rp is involved, that is when it becomes boring, and borderline frustrating.
  6. Really like this piece, seems like a fun new creature to play! +1
  7. Could you please clarify whether or not a nation can simply deny all wars or raids, as I think it’s implied both nations have to be willing from now on? Unless I misread that, but could you clarify please, just so we know for sure.
  8. That’s true, I didn’t think of that. It sounds a lot better in concept, but in practice it would probably be extremely messy. I wish everyone could play fairly, but I’m not sure that could happen, people will always try to make themselves win, even if it doesn’t make sense.
  9. I like that idea a lot, it would be much more fun if raids were like that.
  10. The main concern I have with this is from what I gather a nation can simply deny all wars or raids OOC, which doesn’t make sense if the nation truly has done things that would warrant a war, unless I’m reading this wrong. Is this the case, and if so, are you sticking to that as the final decision?
  11. Not sure what happened with the whole war thing, as I’m fairly new, but I’m glad to see it addressed in a professional manner!
×
×
  • Create New...