Dimitri_P
-
Posts
50 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Everything posted by Dimitri_P
-
Brinksby laughs at the missive, quickly tossing it into a nearby fire. "Mi notz care! Glory to Goz-Bog!" He screeches out, before continuing on his everyday routine without another thought of the dead man.
-
-
bro wtf pkdon1!!!!!! ur gonna make me cry … 😞
-
+1 Looking kinda fresh kinda cool -
Wtf this canot be true ? I cannot believ this Im actualy am shaking in my boots what the fri**ck????????? Ban imediatly! ?
-
New member, zero rep, no pfp.. 10/10 ily
-
+1 Very nice piece
-
[✓] [Event Race Lore] Shuul
Dimitri_P replied to Hastur's topic in Non-Playable Creatures/Event Creatures
+1 very nice -
Banditry should be allowed, as long as it provides meaningful rp between both parties involved, and not just kill someone and take everything on them. When that occurs, it’s simply not fun for the party that gets killed. I’ve had experience with good banditry and bad banditry, and when the rp is good with bandits, I don’t mind handing over some loot, or even getting injured. But when it’s just kill and take loot, and little to no rp is involved, that is when it becomes boring, and borderline frustrating.
-
Really like this piece, seems like a fun new creature to play! +1
-
Could you please clarify whether or not a nation can simply deny all wars or raids, as I think it’s implied both nations have to be willing from now on? Unless I misread that, but could you clarify please, just so we know for sure.
-
That’s true, I didn’t think of that. It sounds a lot better in concept, but in practice it would probably be extremely messy. I wish everyone could play fairly, but I’m not sure that could happen, people will always try to make themselves win, even if it doesn’t make sense.
-
I like that idea a lot, it would be much more fun if raids were like that.
-
The main concern I have with this is from what I gather a nation can simply deny all wars or raids OOC, which doesn’t make sense if the nation truly has done things that would warrant a war, unless I’m reading this wrong. Is this the case, and if so, are you sticking to that as the final decision?
-
Not sure what happened with the whole war thing, as I’m fairly new, but I’m glad to see it addressed in a professional manner!
-
Born in 1693, in Atlas, in Presa de Madera to be more exact, he was an only child. Raised by his father, who was a lumberjack, he learned to use an axe, and his mother taught him basic education. When he was about 16, his father contracted Grish, and passed after a few weeks. His mother, not being able to bear the death of her husband, hung herself. After his mother and father’s death, he left his home to venture out into the world in search of more answers, a meaning to his life, leaving everything behind except a satchel made by his mother, filled with food, and his father’s axe. Now he roams cities, often drinking and getting into fights with people bigger than him, which he almost always loses. He can’t help it though, he likes to think he inherited his short-tempered attitude from his father. He continues this, wandering, looking for something more to his life.
