Jump to content

Alakabam

- Aether VIP -
  • Posts

    1096
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alakabam

  1. I really don't care which tavern is bigger than which I am pro city rp not tavern rp and idc what city it is generally but I think there are several other cities who should blooming much more than roadside taverns, something which shiftnative himself favored (the man who built this map) tried to do. And this hasn't worked well what so ever, taverns have so far proved to kill the noob retention whereas cities were much better at that. Cities play a huge roll in player retention, not taverns and player retention is something we need to focus on because we have lost a significant amount of players and most noobs who apply dont even stay.

    You say you'd like more capital rp but I don't see you roleplaying in Petrus creating fun, so what would make people want to go there, the tavern is just busy cause there is fun to be had and it's a nice enviroment.

  2. I think you are thinking way too highly of the situation, I am implying that tavern rp is more so endorsed by the staff than nation capital rp, they pose no threat hence why no nation has even attacked your tavern yet, but it is a very huge factor as to why players are less attracted to capitals, most rp happen in a tavern isolated from a city whereas in other days most capital rp was in a tavern inside a city.

    Where is tavern rp being endorsed by staff? Just because they are closer to the cloud temple, if that would be the case than why isn't the orc thing filled with people at all times, the problem is that Zero's tavern is actually active and Petrus's is not. Pretty sure the Elven and Dwarven tavern is as busy at times while I have yet to see anyone in the Petrus tavern, besides from when Urara was the owner of it. This would be weird in itself if Oren wasn't the biggest nation with the most people, but even though they have the most people their tavern is less active than the Elves.

  3. 1. The 2 weeks for evidence rule was removed a long time ago, so the argument that Sky should not be banned based on the age of evidence is invalid.

    2. Leaking staff chats is against the rules.

    3. It doesn't matter if he was an admin and a donator, he broke the rules.

    The ban is really long. Is it because the staff have a problem with him? Probably. Do they arbitrarily decide ban lengths and contradict other similar cases? Yeah. Is that going to change? No. The staff have been arbitrary and don't abide by the rules like it's the United States Constitution -- it's a ******* Minecraft server. The staff are going to continue to be inconsistent and contradictory and arbitrary, not much we can change there.

    Out of all the things we could complain about, Sky's ban is not it. He broke a rule pretty clearly and got banned for it. Waste your breath on a more important issue.

    1. The two weeks rule was never removed, if it was then that's yet again an unspecified rule change.

    2. It's hardly a leak if it involves the report, a leak would pertain information that actually mattered to more then one person, which isn't the case as this /leak/ only included things that involved Moogle's ban.

    3. It doesn't matter, that's right but it's still weird to ban him weeks after this actually came up or happened. You'd think that because of his past services that he'd atleast be treated like a well-thinking person instead of a Barnett.

    4. /More important/ don't take opinion as fact, I for one care more about this than any other shitty argument that involves LotC at the moment, and so do many others although I am able to separate opinion from fact.

    5. Lists are redundant.

×
×
  • Create New...