Twodiks

nice video, wonder what kind of video its based off of...

3 minutes ago, Nomine said:

This post was unfunny and unhelpful, worst of all given a public ping in Moderation Discord. This severely cripples my faith in staff. Please do not be purposefully spiteful or isolating a single group of players for the sake of an April Fool's joke. Please be helpful to your community instead.

is this more bait

remove the activity requirement and lets have some fun

people are gonna find it real awkward when the new tech admin announcement comes out 2moro

I can agree with a lot of the sentiment on the thread, but I'm going to be honest. I think I prefer a more Laissez-faire system regarding realms than being extremely restrictive about it. I get that its probably bad for the server for the player base to be rather spread out but I don't see forcing anyone to be under anyone due to a lack of choice is the solution to it. I'd prefer just more strict enforcement for failing nations. I think while many projects will fail, there will be some who stand out and become a unique place on the server. I don't really care if this is done through activity checks or some other sort of means. Either way I think there's no point in limiting player agency in terms of creating nations, when there's nothing forcing nation leaders to be accepting of groups.

I think you kinda simplify the process of just folding into another nation of similar niche as well. Honestly back in the old system, I saw way too many cases of extremely clashing ideas for groups in certain nations that only happened because it was the only nation they could find who gave them land. I accidentally deleted this portion of my comment so I'll also just try to make it short. I think its easy to say people would be more than willing to give land if people just brought an active group and roleplayed in a manor in the city for a while, but I think the nation leader would be a bit hesitant if say they found out they person leading the group was someone who rebelled before or just had a bad history with them before. If we're supposed to limit people's choice in creating nations when say others serve a similar niche, I think it's unfair for them to have to settle in another nation when they can't find a place in the existing nation

"These guys stopped me on the road and beat up my dog." said a sobbing man.

we dont need a play pit like wz or beta for pvpers to keep them occupied, its like you're trying to paint an bad picture when others have made better points about pvps place on the server

NO MORE SHITTY POLLS

I think for better or worse, the server is untouchable due to a community unwilling to actually inconvenience themselves (i.e actually quitting when the server does something bad). But if anything, I think things really need to be shaken up a lot, even just for the sake of it. Despite a couple of shifts here and there, the server really hasn't changed over the past four years. The only noticeable change I saw in the server was when war was basically gone for 1-2 years, and that was unintentional afaik. Even CRP default hasn't really changed conflict too much and that's probably the biggest manmade change I can think about. I know thats its difficult and even dangerous to touch the status quo. But most if not all of these issues people have been talking about in this thread are far from new, and I disagree where people mention that the server has been on the downhill, I feel like its just dull as its ever been.

42 minutes ago, fedallah said:

start treating minecraft like some sort of video game and you will be so much happier

hi frilliam

just ban it, its not worth it. no need to retroactively punish people for something that was allowed before, no matter what assumptions you make of their intentions of using it

"Truly, we never change." An unnamed Van Aert laments.

He stares at an old painting, which portrayed his grandfathers perspective of a previous war.
 

19 hours ago, MalchediaelVult said:

Unless we want to enforce war-pks for everyone.

Agreed, Either no one dies or everyone dies.

Honestly never really saw the point of this, I know for a fact, all it will result in NLs being pk'd in the first war they lose.

1 hour ago, Jihnyny said:

I understand some of moderation take these ‘signs’ into account, but ultimately it seems it dont matta. 

this was the cringest shit i've ever read, did u acc write that seriously

mfw i cant throw all these letters in my fireplace after insulting the forum post writer beforehand

1 minute ago, satinkira said:

This is evidenced by a currently deleted reply of his (funny that) which went along the lines of 'different discord name, this is a bad smear', followed by a paragraph of an apology. 

Those were two different people afaik, if ur talkin abt chaotikals comment

4 minutes ago, LoTC's Next Top Model said:

saying "i will rape you until you're not a f--got anymore" doesn't directly make you a rapist, but i can tell you that non-rapists wouldn't ******* say that.

not saying that the comments still weren't horrible but that was not what was said in those screenshots. It's not even a paraphrase either.

3 minutes ago, AnonymousAlexa said:

Nobody is shouting you down. I read your post in full, and took your concerns into account. Don't conflate criticism and disagreement with refusing to listen.

Nah if you saw the first few comments b5 they got deleted, they sorta were. To be fair though, I don't think Charlemagne can or should police their behavior. It's more for the administration to figure out. I don't think that's char's responsibility because to be honest, those kind of players are commonly found far past just his community.

This discussion is devolving quickly, but I'd like to see if a conversation can still be had. In what way do you expect him to show remorse to his victims? Yeah, I'm not going to dismiss it and just say "He apologized, what else does you want", cause its a stupid take but I can't really think of what other manners is expected of him upon returning to the servers. From what I've seen, and yeah I can get the bias on my side, but he's been on his best behavior towards the community and I don't see what more he needs to prove. He's acknowledged his past and how wrong it was. At best, I can maybe expect a conversation between and the people he's hurt, but that's a tricky situation and might aggravate the situation. 

 

3 hours ago, argonian said:

"Most sane Twodiks selfie," says Stanimar Barclay, a roleplay character, in roleplay.

"What did I do 2 deserve such jest?, Was my art not good enough?" says Adler Van Aert

"Was my art not Aaunic enough?" He rushes back to his canvas, ripping it into two, starting anew.

NAME: Adler

ALLEGIANCE: Aaun

PROPAGANDA PIECE:

NAME: Adler

ALLEGIANCE: Aaun

PROPAGANDA PIECE:

who

Ser Bryan enlists, donning his uniform, ready to face the dangers that await him. @subatomic

WOOOOO! TABBY!