Mirtok

Appeal denied for now for lack of reply. Please include your apology to the aforementioned player(s) in your next appeal. You may reuse this appeal so long as you add what has been asked.

You may appeal on or after 28 May 2024. Until then, your forum account will be restricted from posting.

@RugurConditional for your appeal to be accepted, I would like for you to post as sincere an apology as you can to the person you said you would like to contact on discord. You will not be given the information of this person so take this opportunity as if they will be reading it here. Please message me on discord when you have done so (my username is just mirtok).

Your appeal is under review. Expect a response after the team concludes its discussion.

In the future, please submit a Staff Report if you feel a staff member is abusing their powers/position. You received a warning point for spamming which you admit to doing on purpose after identify that staff was hiding your content. Questions you have about why the status updates were hidden may be discussed with Anna or you may start a Feedback thread in an appropriate subforum to discuss your concerns openly.

Appeal Accepted. Do your best not to repeat any of the behaviors described in your appeal. You will be on a strict thresh hold for toxic, slanderous, or harassing conduct, which will result in a extensive ban right away. If you attempt to contact the player mentioned in your report, only do so in earnest and if they ask you not to speak to them, respect it immediately.

Your appeal is under review. Expect a response after the team concludes its discussion.

This appeal is denied. The decision to ban you for this behavior was due to your current infraction history. In the span of 24 hours you've accumulated 3 infractions for Player Conduct. The appropriate ban length is 1 to 4 weeks, meaning this Moderator was lenient. Furthermore, we do not accept appeals for temporary bans. You will be automatically unbanned at the conclusion of the original time allotted.

Your appeal has been denied. Refer to private correspondence with Admins for future appeals. You may submit appeals to [email protected].

Your appeal is under review. Expect a response after the team concludes its discussion.

Your appeal has been denied. Contact @The60th or Administration with further questions.

Your ban-appeal is being reviewed by the Admins.

This report is now closed. As agreed to by Digit, the involvement of their character will be voided for the RP. They will also receive an infraction for metagaming. For a first offense, it will only be a recorded warning, but subsequent offenses will result in a ban.

Sorry 'bout that, welcome back.

This report is under review. We will offer @Digit_005 the opportunity to provide their side of the story before making a ruling.

This appeal has been denied. Due to recent conduct with other staff members, you will be asked to reappeal in 1 month. Please address the original reasons for your banning as well as this recent one for your next appeal.

Your ban-appeal is being reviewed. You can expect a response within the next 72 hours.

Your ban-appeal is being reviewed. You can expect a response within the next 72 hours.

Moved to The Great Library. It shall be sorted into the appropriate category shortly.

If you feel this is a mistake, please contact myself or another moderator. 

Moved to The Great Library. It shall be sorted into the appropriate category shortly.

If you feel this is a mistake, please contact myself or another moderator. 

From the provided information, no rules were actually broken. Owners of realm/settlement owned doors are able to freely add or remove people. As well, discords are OOC tools with the same privileges afforded to the owners to be able to add/remove freely. However, the region owners must be careful and provide a proper eviction notice before removing @Xein000 from the region perms should they wish to. No infractions will be issued.

Contact me on discord at mirtok if there are any further questions.

Although OOC content has been properly hidden under spoilers, in the interest of a productive/appropriate RP thread, refrain from the OOC back and forth that's been occurring. Further discussion on the fair/unfairness of what occurred OOCly will be hidden.

This report is under review. We will offer the opportunity for the named parties to provide a response before a verdict is given.

I've reviewed the logs of the situation. There was a misunderstanding with the rules where FalseLogicIt stated that if an agreement could not be met then the combat defaults to PvP. In the event of a disagreement, the default combat method is Combat Role Play (CRP). From the conversation between the two parties at the time of the encounter, it appears that both sides eventually agreed to PvP but perhaps under false pretenses.

@user331 Even as the defender of an encounter, you are not entitled to choose your preferred method of CRP. CRP on this server is based on a set of guidelines, not strict rules. CRP may be conducted through rolling but that has to be agreed upon by all participants, your opponent specifically said they do not wish to roll combat if they don't have to. You also cannot opt out of an encounter because you aren't able to do roll combat.

No infractions will be issued for this instance, please review the Combat rules posted here on the forums at the following link.

Under Review
 

@MAAD4M (MC Name: FalseLogicIt) Is actually the person you CRP'd with. They are welcome to provide their side of the events before a ruling is made.