PosidonX7

The boi wrote this app drunk lul.

This reminds me of the app I had to make in the beginning of Axios. I like it much better.

A spoop’s voice beamed in chaotic radiance, ”You claim to be immortal without truly knowing what it is like.You only care for how much pointless beauty you can gain. You speak as if your silvery eyes make you pure, but it does quite the opposite. You reek of the boring lawful tropes. You make claim to the light, yet you know nothing of what light truly is. All things evil must surely be from the dark? You stand only in the shadow of true light. I will scorch your souls with the light you so desperately grasp for.”

A Mali’ker’s soft, yet long eyes gazed upon the missive that told her about the news, ”Shame I wasn’t there to assist my fellow ‘Ker. I would have loved to cut down those imperial swines.”

*smiles suns smile “Ave Courland”

A spoop chuckles in the blinding light.

1 minute ago, Dardonas said:

Bob the demon immolating himself with his own Bob-colored Malflame and going to do a linebacker charge into a crowd of poorly dressed druids sounds a bit busted.

Unless Bob the demon tightly hugs one of the druids, it wont do anything. Malflame only burns someone as long as it has direct contact to them. As such, I wouldn’t advise running straight into a crowd. That’s a good way to get put down.

4 minutes ago, Dardonas said:

I imagine you probably don’t when there is an entire section devoted to clarifying that inferis cannot be uwu demons that can run on all fours the at the speed of cheetahs.

 

It doesn’t matter whether or not you trust his word on it or not, the fact of the matter remains that because this very argument is being had there are clarifications to be had.  This is my interpretation of what should be done to be a healthy step forward for making Naztherak magic more concise, and there is absolutely no reason why inferis would not be effected by malflame.   Having Inferis immune to malflame just nullifies the complete entire reason as to why Malflame exists in this magic in the first place: to subdue demons.  Malflame is objectively a bad combat magic compared to something like Electric Evocation.  Its one purpose is to offer some offense and to help shackle demons, ergo, it has to effect demons, ergo, it burns them.

It would seem that you are now attempting to jab at me about something that happened a half a year ago, I stay by my point in not trusting any of this and still dislike this amendment.
Also, let me remind you of something: 
 

2.  Measured criticism is welcome. Provocation, insults, and personal remarks are punishable.

• Targeted, abusive behaviour is not tolerated.

20 minutes ago, _Hexe_ said:

sadly doesn’t go over inferi

 

 

also everybody explains everything differently so unless it’s in the lore i really don’t trust that

Perhaps because an inferis can not burn itself with it’s own malflame?

I don’t think I can trust your word on this, and I definitely don’t support this amendment. 

Now that I think about it, I do remember the self-immolation spell where an inferis can cover a portion or the entirety of themselves in malflame depending on how many emotes they channel. Furthermore, it was explained to me that the malflame from one inferis can burn another inferis, but they can’t burn themselves.

6 minutes ago, Dardonas said:

They should be more careful then because its whats currently in the current lore and it also prevents kamikaze malflame divers

Then how do some Inferis passively drip with malflame and have it running through them aesthetically? An inferis burning itself with it’s own malflame is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever heard. It can’t consume it’s own soul, unless I am incorrect in that too.

11 minutes ago, General_Wartface said:

I hope you burn in the nether

The being hummed in amuse, “Oh but I have, would you like to go there too?”

47 minutes ago, Archbishop said:

It is a well known fact that demonic beings are required to feast upon the flesh of the descendants in order to survive, some even require the blood of infants.

A particular spoop lets out a breath of annoyance, “I find it insulting that you are so ignorant to think we need to eat flesh. We eat regular food, you dunce. I’d imagine the flesh of a human would taste something akin to what comes out an ass’s ass.”

A spoop hums, “Oh? Who is this? A new competitor?”

A certain spoop considers it odd that they would recognize Kary despite it not being his body at all, and not having the same voice, name, or any of the same physical features. Even his face was different. How very odd indeed.

Just now, The King Of The Moon said:

2 minutes ago, PosidonX7 said:

Unless otherwise stated, assume it is normal revival.

I’m not going to assume that. There’s no reason why the monks would bring infernal creatures who’ve been to ebreitaes and back to life when they die, and even if that is the case it needs to be written and clarified by

-facepalm- they currently reform on their own.

1 minute ago, The King Of The Moon said:

I’m not asking about age. I’m asking about when they are killed.

Unless otherwise stated, assume it is normal revival.

9 hours ago, The King Of The Moon said:

Ok but that’s a relevant question so please write if they have a PK clause or if there’s a timer/ consequence for those that die and don’t PK... Or just clarify if it’s neither? Because like, it doesn’t say anywhere if a Zar’akal can have clones or a machine spirit or use blood magic rebirth just as examples of resurrection, all three of which would prove very problematic if not addressed in this lore piece. 

Moderation has always avoided the topic of “You are old it is time to die now.” It is one of the things that just happens. If a person dies from old age, then they die. If they don’t, they don’t.

8 hours ago, Dunstan said:

They will then bath in the bloodbath and after (some amount of time) the pool will light itself with hellfire hued that of zar’akal’s malflame. After (this much time in the pool) they will emerge with their desired changes

@DunstanI’m not sure if you meant to the leave the areas in parenthesis the way they are, or if you meant to add an actual amount of time.

8 hours ago, Dunstan said:

-Require 4 emotes to summon. Only 2 beasts can be active in combative roleplay.

In the redlines for summoning beasts, is it 2 beasts per naztherak present, or simply 2 beasts in total?

Beyond those couple things, I think this piece is a fantastic work of art. 

@TamaraI don’t believe you are suppose to post this here. Your are suppose to post a lore submission in this thread in order to get it approved: https://www.lordofthecraft.net/forums/forum/529-lore-submissions/

An unspecific Demon does a scree. 

Lol this event broke ALL of the vaeyl lore. All of it.

I got bored one day so I took this screenshot of Fenn.


 

Boy, does this one bring back memories..