Jump to content

KamikazeReaper

Gold VIP
  • Posts

    210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KamikazeReaper

  1. Third Ordinance of the Redenford Magistrate

    3rd of Sun’s Smile, 1821

     

     

     


     

    tiYP_l9gTGr5d0dmSVFIL5PDhO3zVti0-ntWSt97YaXLMQom9ZPPECLD9W5ISZH3gd8Ld0qkNvoiV20fa_PbBSRlLGDbJFTAgTb3q8AuzZs25TAMkKOSR1I4qf2FVwPYKGtwS4xr

     

     

     


     

    In accordance with the Imperial Charter for the City of Redenford, the Magistrate of Redenford by virtue of Our August Crown, is tasked with a specific set of duties. As we settle into this new realm we call home through GOD’s grace, the Magistrate’s office of Redenford deems it important to begin the road ahead -- that is the construction of our settlement’s bureaucracy.

     

    In accordance with said charter, the Magistrate is charged with one of the following duties to:

    IV. Administrate free and fair city elections.

     

    Thus, it is seen fit by this Office to hereby open the period of submissions for the upcoming Head Clerk & Sheriff Election of 1821.

     

    A prospective candidate for Lord Mayor must meet these qualifications:

    1. At least 18 years of age

    2. In good legal standing 

    3. Own property within Redenford

    Should a candidate meet such criterion, the following form must be filled by a prospective candidate:

    1. Full Name of the Candidate:

    2. Age of the Candidate:

    3. Street Address of the Candidate:

    4. What office Head Clerk/Sheriff office

     

    All powers of the selected offices of Redenford  are outlined within the Imperial Charter. Candidacies for Head Clerk or Sheriff will close in five saint days from today.(( This Friday at noon EST))

     

    ISSUED IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 1821,

    The Magistrate of Redenford, Henrik Komnenos

     

    ((This is a forum roleplay post. Replies should only be players reporting their candidacies for Head Clerk or Sheriff in Redenford. The sign up will close Friday at Noon EST))


     

  2. tqejPv-Qlki1wQ8hHepuqoe6HoFEoV6cMEbt7fylsVTFK-R8dWEgt3xVPZbr9BLlHPmuI_kUwqK3M_ObCK1a2T_R4KJ-OewaFu9PcbRSwqhSA3o1t6f3rgN7eDle82yXzawi-K1I

    Brandt & D’emyth 

    Represented by Henrik Komnenos & James Fisher of the Komnenos Law Firm & Fisher at law,

     

    DESIRES TO COUNTER RESPONSE TO THE APPEAL FILED FOR THE FOLLOWING RULING;

    [Ruling on The Crown V. Brandt & D’Emyth]

    1L1UI4OIASju96-hHVWBLeamX66ToL-UQn1ttmPU7DfPZw7aWRtMIbkYVTHUQVqI285aC7RN3T9t590O2cCWfi_Ag6i3r6qT7uOrEYU1mjv9clD25HuVDRyRE6QugFBd6KV0o4ZD

    ON THE GROUNDS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

     

    -MISTRIAL:

    Mistrial is not an unheard of term within the halls of the court nor in the ORC
    however the use of mistrial is, there no proper use been set up for beside for appeals, yet it applies here

    most of the evidence gathered by the Ministry of justice was gathered by man who in open court did admit that he did assault one of the defendants before leading the investigation, even by his own written words deems them both guilty before finishing off the investigation amidst the investigation itself, testimonials and case evidence was handed to an Amiee De Frand, who even did admit so, the same person that had been called in for three different testimonies about the ordeal, while we the defense cannot say when that was done, we can say her testimonies which is an large part of this case cannot be trusted giving her prior strikes within the court of law, which was forgery and framing. 

     

    As the Ministry of Justice themself states in their own appeal:
    First of all, it is the opinion of the Crown that the declaration of this “mistrial” made by the presiding Judge of this case was wholly illegal, as no motion or formal request was filed, offering no formal submission of evidence and no opportunity for the prosecution to ever respond to the defense’s allegations regarding the evidence.  

     

    States that the Ministry of Justice already have more “evidence” which have not been submitted with the books of evidence, and during the hearing the defense already made claims for mistrial, and was giving a formal response from the Ministry of justice’s solicitor. During the hearing the defense brought up 210.02 - Volenti non fit injuria as one of the backing claims for a mistrial as well

     

     

    and on the claims by the Ministry of Justice on breach of Trial Procedure. both the defense and the prosecution was allowed to take turns, however while it's true the trial never made it to the jury nor witness stage, the ruling judge cannot be at fault there as the short of trial lies within the Ministry of Justice and not the judge herself.

      on the appeal statement from the ministry of justice:

    The Crown also wishes to state that the validity of the evidence provided by the Investigator Arlo Cooper to the Court is completely irrelevant to the correct follow-up of the legal procedure, which should have been followed by the presiding Judge. The fact that the Defense questioned the validity of an evidence brought by Investigator Cooper does not justify any declaration of mistrial by the presiding Judge and, if anything, it merely should condition how the Court, and in this case, the Jury, reviews that evidence and all the other evidence provided to the Court when they decide the verdict on the guilt of the Defendants.

     We the defense agree with the judge's ruling based on
    404.15 - On False Statements, Forgery, and Perjury

    404.15A - Where an individual makes a false statement, false recount of events, false

    accusation, or false report.

    404.15B - Where an individual creates non-genuine documents or pieces of evidence

    as a means to create a false narrative or false accusation.

    404.15C - Where an individual upon a lawful oath, gives any false testimony on a

    matter of inquiry.

    all would apply, which would be enough reason to remove the books of evidence the Ministry of Justice had provided the court and the defense, which leaves the case without any any sort of evidence and would have to go on hear say, 

     

     

     On the statement of Ministry Of justice:

    The precedent established by this decision would suggest that cases may, and ought to be, simply thrown out by the circuit justice should the defense make unsubstantiated (as no evidence of Cooper’s misconduct had even been present at the time of trial) claims of misconduct.

     The Defense did in fact submit evidence of Arlo Cooper’s misconduct during the hearing and in the books of evidence, for the trial itself, even with sworn testimony from a member within the Ministry of Justice itself.

     

    On the statement from the Ministry Of Justrice:

    1. “Arlo Cooper, in the submission of his evidence, added in writing that he found the defense to be guilty prior to the trial or even the preliminary hearing, thus admitting his bias on the case.”

     

    The investigator, and the prosecutor, both must be convinced of the defendant’s guilt in order to properly prosecute. They argue the case, using the evidence obtained and their points within the law, to convince the court of the defendant’s guilt. This is a basic premise of prosecuting the law.

     

    If that was true then
    210.010 - On Immunity

    210.010A - Where an agent of the law, in the course of their duties and acting within

    the bounds assigned to them, is compelled to commit a violation of the law, that

    agent shall not be held liable.

     

    should had been brought up by the ministry of justice to back their evidence up to ensure no claims of misdeeds or misconduct could be used however no such move was ever brought up in the hearing nor the short life span of the trial

    furthermore
    210.08 - On Provocation

    210.08A - Where an individual is invoked or compelled by another individual to act

    with a sudden or temporary loss of self control and commits a crime as a response,

    the individual shall be held liable with mitigated punishment or lesser conviction.

    very much applies to their evidence, that Miss. De Frand did openly admit to providing our clients and the masses 

    which brings in
    210.02 - Volenti non fit injuria

    210.02A - Where an individual consents or actively places oneself in a position of

    harm or danger, that individual may not bring a claim against another party in tort or

    delict.

    as De Frand did not try to leave the novellen for her own safety, instead did remain and triggered the 210,08 stated above

     

    and if such debates about the evidence and the case itself done by Mr.Cooper and the Prosecutor was held

    210.03 - In pari delicto

    210.03A - Where the individual held liable for a crime and the party convicting the

    individual for a crime is deemed both at fault, whether for the same crime or similar,

    both the individual and the convicting party shall not be held liable.

     

    should clearly had been on the table and stated in a footnote in their book of evidence but it was not in fact, all of theses was openly denied by the Prosecuting with very little backing

     

     On the statement from the ministry of justice:

    Perhaps the judge would do good to be reminded of this right and its application to all men, not just the defense in this case.

    This is irrelevant, as it's clear in the rights of men, the right to trial: so no man will ever be wrongly accused when not charged by a trial of their peers.

     

    The Ministry of Justice already accused our clients beforehand and made their trial evidence based on such,  while evidence shows the misdeeds of Arlo Cooper who did admit so openly in court, Arlo Cooper was not wrongly accused, he however was never giving an judgement, which on the statement of the Ministry of Justice, suggest there was in fact an trial and an judgement was giving on the missdeeds of Mr.Cooper, who acted on behalf of the Ministry during the investigation

     

     

    IN CONCLUSION:

     

    The Ruling made by the judge of the trial was fair and correct as much of the evidence was unuseable which left the Ministry of justice with nothing but hear say, and the ruling stopped an injustice from being committed and if we look at the large conflicting items in the books of evidence

    and then look at the ORC
    614.06B - Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

    (i) The threshold to convict a Defendant of a felony or treason shall be

    beyond a reasonable doubt.

    There was nothing but doubt on if our clients did commit any of the so called crimes that were being pushed by the Ministry Of Justice. and the  usage of “ MIstrial “  should very well cover this case and future cases, where everything put forward may it be by the crown or one of the people, is done in bad faith, done with means unbecoming of an proper and just trial

    tqejPv-Qlki1wQ8hHepuqoe6HoFEoV6cMEbt7fylsVTFK-R8dWEgt3xVPZbr9BLlHPmuI_kUwqK3M_ObCK1a2T_R4KJ-OewaFu9PcbRSwqhSA3o1t6f3rgN7eDle82yXzawi-K1I

     

  3. UfxwpG2MsGStP0tYQJ4CjfUBRmtr-_uA3cJ60id4O0QRZtPDTzxk_3-LqSDk2H01I1TvQ_-DTe6QZndSDIRg8KS2_g9xKDeSfHXOsgZQwTVJsCTzcR0pjUeY_mfa5EzYbk5J8SqZ

     

     


     

    Redenford Election Decree

    3rd of Sigismund's end, 1816 

     

    BE IT SO PRONOUNCED that, in the year 1816, in accordance with the Imperial Charter for Redenford, The Magistrate of Redenford, by virtue of the Imperial Crown, has actualized his invested authority to administer free and fair city elections within the settlement.

     

    The Magistrate’s office of Redenford has thus rightly ordered that the term rate for elections for Head Clerk & Sheriff of Redenford shall be no more than every six years to ensure proper election values are kept within the settlement and to ensure the suffrage of Our subjects.  

     

     

     



     

     


     


     

                                                    ISSUED 1816 from the Office of the Redenford Magistrate 

     The Magistrate of Redenford, Henrik Komnenos

     

    PoxVsmvlOi6dfnogorxD0ueCa16LLDSfLPbKbJUv2MIrbAK8q2R-bpGEVIWy3jp0u5kcMeuvhb3Rjm_UcIeSpFfojTUOkXnRa0M2GEdPdSXbE2i6UHYnrElprD0-RLzB7SYM5cg


     

  4. UfxwpG2MsGStP0tYQJ4CjfUBRmtr-_uA3cJ60id4O0QRZtPDTzxk_3-LqSDk2H01I1TvQ_-DTe6QZndSDIRg8KS2_g9xKDeSfHXOsgZQwTVJsCTzcR0pjUeY_mfa5EzYbk5J8SqZ

     

     


     

    Redenford Elections

    10th of the First Seed, 1816 

     

    BE IT SO PRONOUNCED that, in the year 1816, in accordance with the Imperial Charter for Redenford, the Magistrate of Redenford, by virtue of the Imperial Crown, has actualized his invested authority to administer free and fair city elections within the settlement.

     

    The Magistrate’s office of Redenford has thus rightly ordered the tabulation of the First Head Clerk AND Sheriff elections.

     

    As for these offices within Redenford, after careful validation and rightful tabulation it has been determined that:

     

     

    Patrick O’Rourke shall be Head Clerk of Redenford,

     

    Frank Bourdon Shall be the Sheriff of Redenford


     

     


     


     

                                                    ISSUED 1816 from the Office of the Redenford Magistrate 

     

    The Magistrate of Redenford, Henrik Komnenos

     

  5. Candidacies for House of Commons Elections in the Providence District, 24th Diet

     

    SURNAME: Komnenos

    FIRST NAME: Henrik

    ADDRESS OF RESIDENCE: Helvets avenue 5

    YEAR OF BIRTH:  1754

     

    Are you registered and eligible to vote in the Providence District? :Yes

     

    Do you have any other title, peerage or military service that may conflict with becoming a Member of the House of Commons, as per the Edict of Reform (1763)? :No

     

    If yes, do you understand that you will be required to resign or abdicate from this position should you be elected to the House of Commons, and if this does not occur your seat shall be considered to be vacant?: Yes

     

    ((MC NAME)):Kamikaze_Reaper

  6. 4nyzsp_CYjxrNRV-cLbrdNaYzNtLCLvdUXuWUNmZPY21sXXN1mqgCU4V0HKCR54rIcRBjje3XUTUjgcyYrHnKd6mN_p_bk-lx1Fk5m0OJikkMdPAc9K4KbqO7UDas4dU0fodJZc

     

    HEAR YE HEAR YE PROVIDENCE IT'S TIME FOR AN NEW LORD MAYOR!

     

    For years our current lord mayor has been ignoring his work within city hall

    to focus on the otherwise lovely events and remodels across our city

    leaving other matters in the dust causing you to suffer

    thanks to other matters not being able to handle

    this ends now.

     

    Come voting day vote on me 

    Augustus Otto Komnenos

    and order within city hall shall return no more backroom deals on contracts

    that could help our local companies, creating jobs and money to flow out to the many instead of the few, with me as your lord mayor i will stride to work closer to the home office to ensure

    work within our city goes forward in an orderly pace and within an acceptable cost

    While i may not be able to promise the same amount of free flowing events as our current mayor i stride to do what i can within that area and hoping his team would wish to work with me if i win and help me breath new life into our bazar so our city trade can fire back up to life

     

    While I cant say much about the other candidates beside one let an drug den operate within the novellen for years if the man lets such vile ordeals operate within his own roof what would he do with the whole capital city?

    Will he help such ordeals spread? or just ignore it hoping the ministry of justice will take care of it?


     

  7. Lf8CxlqIY7Ga_cGAyqzfc_ysHntNOZQlnazGduWCf3Jdd-tTyUjbZwG1Y8WEaFNP-TFgWBeL37b0fOtjZuj24y9tntkmoIfmx8eW9hWGG-rnzjLD4rcps3zebvvaeaKbG7jSFCzL

    Replying Affidavit

    12th of The Deep Cold, 1814

     

    NjX5xXhEx2CZpe_FcO7Jxru2UhLcoOIZlG4cOUUOnviPKua0qvUvysKQ4y3_48MA07M5pnyBxkOXiT1X6OOcVZMDy-6APeW4hbV1EC7UVQyWwic0x5hjwNYxYiF_DKtOnqfFBPHm

    Brandt & D’Emyth

    Represented by Henrik Komnenos & James Fisher,

     

    DESIRES TO RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING  SUIT;

    THE CROWN  v. BRANDT & D’EMUTH

     

     

    Lf8CxlqIY7Ga_cGAyqzfc_ysHntNOZQlnazGduWCf3Jdd-tTyUjbZwG1Y8WEaFNP-TFgWBeL37b0fOtjZuj24y9tntkmoIfmx8eW9hWGG-rnzjLD4rcps3zebvvaeaKbG7jSFCzL

    ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

     

    Elijah Alexander d’Emyth

     

    202.04A - On Murder: Where an individual intentionally commits such an act of violence upon another which brings about their death, with no premeditation, this shall be a murder in the second degree, a felony.

     

    209.03A - On Attempt: Where an individual actively attempts, but fails to commit, a crime, the individual shall be held liable with a mitigated punishment according to the crime which was attempted.

     

    During the statements and testimony of our client we call in

    210.04 - On Duress

    210.04A - Where an individual commits a crime intentionally, but under reasonably

    proximate threat of force equal to or less than the severity of the crime committed,

    that individual shall not be held liable. Rather, the individual responsible for the

    threat shall be held liable.

     

     

    as our client stepped into an ordeal to help a close friend of his from being stabbed, which is why he should not be held liable of the outcome, even tho it turned around and it's in our belief that Miss De Frand should be the one held liable for the outcome and not our client

     

    Brandt

     

    202.02B - On Battery: Where an individual intentionally commits upon another an unlawful act of  violence which brings about lasting, but not permanent injury, incapacitates for any length of time, or utilizes a dangerous weapon , this shall be battery of second degree, a misdemeanor.

     

    - Broke Aimee de Frand’s ribs and her knee and Agnes de Frand’s nose.

     

    202.04A - On Murder: Where an individual intentionally commits such an act of violence upon another which brings about their death, with no premeditation, this shall be a murder in the second degree, a felony.

     

    209.03A - On Attempt: Where an individual actively attempts, but fails to commit, a crime, the individual shall be held liable with a mitigated punishment according to the crime which was attempted.

     

    on the charges of Battery for our client Brandt we would like to call in

    210.08 - On Provocation

    210.08A - Where an individual is invoked or compelled by another individual to act

    with a sudden or temporary loss of self control and commits a crime as a response,

    the individual shall be held liable with mitigated punishment or lesser conviction.

     

    As Miss De frand was the trigger for the fight in the first place

     

    On the attempted murder we would like to call in 

    210.07 - On Necessity

    210.07A - Where an individual is compelled by circumstances beyond their control,

    as a last resort, commit a crime in order to prevent a more injurious outcome, that

    individual shall not be held liable.

     

    As Miss De Frand had prior drawn her own dagger on our client and he was acting in self defense and in the necessity to save his own life. and should not be held liable for the outcome

     

     

     

  8. Sitting of the City Assembly, 11th of Malin’s Welcome, 1814.

     

    PRESENT:

    LORD SPEAKER:
    Augustus Otto Komnenos

    Valecius de Rosius 

    carter Komnenos 

    Akello Cenobia

     Anastasia Komnenos

    Otis de Rosius

    ABSENT

    ALDERMAN:
    Olivar Bourbon

     

     

     

    Lord Speaker election: Alderman Augustus Komnenos v Alderman Carter Komnenos

    Winner: Alderman Augustus Komnenos

     

    The Providence Cremation Act, 1814

     Aye: 

    O.Rosius
    A.Komnenos
    C.Komnenos
    Speaker

     Nay: 

    A.Cenobia
    V.Rosius

     Abstain: 

     Final tally 4/2/0

     

    Tax Reduction Act 1814

    Aye:

    O.Rosius
    V.Rosius
    A.Cenobia
    O.Bourbon

    Nay: 

    Speaker

    C.Komnenos

    A.Komnenos

    Abstain:

    Final Tally: 4-3-0

     

    Removal of The Medical Documentation Act, 1803

     

    Aye: 

    Speaker

    A.Komnenos
    O.Bourbon

    O.Rosius

    Nay: 

    V.Rosius
    C.Komnenos

    A.Conbia

    Abstain:

    Final Tally: 4-3-0

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Well welcome to the new aldermen, I motion we begin this meet if there could be a second.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second as well!”


     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I second the motion to start.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Since we have a second, we shall begin the meet, first order of business is the speaker elections.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I nominate myself as Lord Speaker.”


     

    Carter Komnenos II “very well, alderman Komnenos, well I run for re-election, does anyone else wish to run for speaker?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I motion to relocate to the Victory pub so we can have this meeting in peace.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “So Mr.Armas can have his lovely rally.”

     

    Anastasia Rhoysln Komnenos: “I second this motion.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “I call for a vote, all in favor of moving to the victory pub.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Aye.”

     

    Anastasia Rhoysln Komnenos: “Aye.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Aye.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Aye.”

     

    Otis de Rosius stood up. “Bit unprofessional, relocating to a pub, no?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “We can't talk while he's shouting.”

     

    Anastasia Rhoysln Komnenos: “Better than being here where we can't hear each other.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “It's a - - Respectable pub.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I'd prefer to be quiet, brother!”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Okay, now that we have made it to the pub, does anyone else wish to run for speaker?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I nominate myself as Lord Speaker.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Yes I know Augustus, but I suppose if no one else is running except Alderman Komnenos and I, we should vote.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second that.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “Third.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Alderman Cenobia, what is your vote?”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “I vote for Alderman Augustus.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Alderman Komnenos?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I vote myself.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Alderwoman Komnenos?”

     

    Anastasia Rhoysln Komnenos: “I vote for Augustus.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Alderman Rosius?”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I vote Alderman Carter Komnenos.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “And other Alderman Rosius?”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “I vote Alderman Carter Komnenos as well.


     

    Carter Komnenos II: “I vote myself, making is 3-3….”


     

    Augustus Komnenos: “By law to settle ties a coin flip is the common way to settle the matter.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Which Alderman wishes to flip the coin.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Aye.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Normally it would be the Magistrate.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Alderman Cenobia may flip the coin.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second that.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Think fast Cenobia.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Heads Carter Tails me.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alright now that's been settled.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Now we move onto bills and acts.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I motion to start the debate on the first bill.”

    Akello Cenobia: “I second that.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second that.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “I second.”

    The Providence Cremation Act, 1814

    Augustus Komnenos: “The Tax bill from Alderman Rosius.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Everyone please double check it.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius has the floor to speak if he pleases.”

     

    Otis de Rosius “Fellow Aldermen, as we may have heard from the yelling outside the MOJ, the lawmen seek pay for their work as the soldiers, for their work is equal in importance.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Mind if I rebuttal in?”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I'd like to have the floor as well - later.”

     

    Otis de Rosius I surrender the floor for questioning” 

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius you do know the Ministry of Justice gets their budget from the imperial budget right?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Meaning Tax paper money is their funding and the city of providence shouldn't be funding their ministry with more money then the state can issue in the first place.”

     

    Valent de Rosius stands up. “Indeed I understand that one is of national level and we are on regional level, but as Attorney-General - I see the problem well, I myself have received zero minas for my work nor has any other member - over thirty employes.”


     

    Augustus Komnenos: “And if you ask my father Mr.Komnenos he can tell you he worked without pay as well.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “The last weeks were disastrous and chaos - crime is rising and the MoJ is managing to hold that chaos, but what do the employees receive.. Nothing!”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I do understand, Alderman Komnenos… One is of national level and our jurisdiction is only over Providence.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “So Lord Speaker, tell me. . . If this could ruin providence how does the ISA 

    Tax discount not ruin providence. . . It's the same thing simply.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “It's the solicitor general's own duty to ensure the funding issued by the state comes to his department not ours.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I don't support that tax break.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “But if we let every single department get a tax break the wallet is gonna run dry.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “That's unfair.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “If the ISA is to receive funding from the City's Budget - the MoJ is to as well!”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “I see your point but unlike the ISA I do not believe the Justice Workers get free housing.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “The MoJ is the one keeping the order and safety in the city, why shouldn't they receive tax breaks?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “The ISA used to do the same.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Well not anymore….”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “The army is also going way above their station for the empire.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “The MoJ has grown quite in the past years and it's success.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Without them we would never have advanced to the level we are today.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Aye.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “But the city itself is very dependent on the MoJ.”

     

    Valecius de Rosius: The only thing keeping the order is the MoJ backed by the ISA.

     

    Valent de Rosius: “The only thing keeping the order is the MoJ backed by the ISA.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “So what's your saying the MoJ is not able to do their job without the army?”

     

    Otis de Rosius. “The solicitor general came to me to ensure the funding of his department, I'm not sure who you expect to resolve the problem at hand. It seems to keep getting tossed around, for they are a highly prestigious job as the ISA.”

     

    Akello Cenobia speaks up “I motion to move this to a vote.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “It's the house's issue not ours and with that I yield.”

    Augustus Komnenos: “I second the motion.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Seeing as the debating isn't changing any minds.”

     

    Otis de Rosius sighed. “I third.”

     

    Valent de Rosius.. “No - not at all, the MoJ has handled the crime in the city pretty well under Galbraith's Ministry and continues to do.. Easing the work of the ISA, which laid on their shoulders due to the fall management of the MoJ of previous SGs..”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second as well!”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “All in favour we move onto voting.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Aye.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius on the right what's your vote.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Aye.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Aye.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius on the left.”

    Otis de Rosius: “Rosius votes Aye.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Komnenos.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Cenobia.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Aye.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Lord Speaker Komnenos.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderwoman Komnenos voted nay.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “It's tie… what about the seventh alderman?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Which leaves the 3 aye and 3 nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “No majority was reached.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Voting goes to Absent.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “Alderman Bourbon, I believe.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “That would be right.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I motion we move to the next bill for the day.”

    Carter Komnenos II: “I second.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “I second.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “I third.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “All in favour.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Aye.”

    The Providence Cremation Act, 1814

    Augustus Komnenos: “The Cremation Act.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “As I made this I do wish to take the floor.”


     

    Augustus Komnenos: “In the past Providence has had major issues with our graveyard.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Graves being dug up.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Bodies going missing.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Even parts of them are eaten.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Our late Empress body was stolen.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “Excuse me fellow Alderman, I must use the restroom.” He stood up. “May I submit my vote now?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Which is why I suggest we make it law to cremate everyone that dies.”

    Valent de Rosius. “May I have the floor?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: you may be excused.

     

    Akello Cenobia raises his hand too “I'd like to speak but Alderman Rosius may go first.”

    Otis de Rosius: “Rosius votes Aye, apologies.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I yield the floor and pass it on to Alderman Rosius.”

     

    Valecius de Rosius: The stolen bodies and bones - that can be easily avoided by having more patrols in the city. I think that populace shall decide how their relatives shall depart the world - be it buried, cremated..

     

    Valent de Rosius: “The stolen bodies and bones - that can be easily avoided by having more patrols in the city. I think that populace shall decide how their relatives shall depart the world - be it buried, cremated..”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “It's part of the crime problem - stealing of bodies is crime.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “So. . . I have to say I agree with you Mr. Rosius, but! I have a compromise I believe that will make everyone happy.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I'm not sure Alderman Rosius has yielded his time yet.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I yield.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Cenobia has the floor.”

     

    Akello Cenobia nods back to the De Rosius before beginning his piece “So, I prefer the idea of an option as to not force a families hand, but to help with the issue of grave robbing of future buried bodies and current ones I believe a concrete slab could be in order.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “This would cause it to take long to retrieve a body and allow the ISA to catch them or completely deter them.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “The Empress was placed in a tomb, you can see the tomb right outside from here.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Da?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Which had guards.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Continue.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “She was still stolen.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Then to be completely honest, if it was guarded, and made of a metal or stone. . . It'd be blamed on the lousy guardsmen.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “And we're only talking about ordinary citizens not nobles or royals in this sense.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “If I recall right the tomb is encased in quartz.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Then it'd fall on the guards.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “But don't that demerit Alderman Rosius comment with patrols?”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Nay- . . . You said they had guards there? On site, no?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “If I recall right, yes there were guards.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Then a patrol would've done nothing if guards were already there.”

    Augustus Komnenos: “But if a guard station didn't stop it, why would a patrol.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Exactly, to be completely truthful, there is no way that we can completely stop grave robberies as we cannot inforce cremations, and simply it should be left to the family, not the government”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “That's just for one case, the robbers of the tomb might've been very experienced or magic users which helped them against the soldiers thus the robbery of the late Empress's tomb is not to be seen as what would happen to each case.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I motion we move on to voting!”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius I have a question.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “I second that.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “This might tip the vote either way.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “If I recall right the ministry has a record of all reported crimes within the empire.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Indeed.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Are there accounts of grave robbing and the like in that record?”


     

    Valent de Rosius: “Well.. I haven't remembered exactly the document, but I think there might 

    be few.. Give me some time to think!”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “If there is, can you on top of your head mention what types?”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I can't recall at the moment, probably reading it over might help.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I motion we place the bill on wait until the next meeting.”

     

    Akello Cenobia I second.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Nay.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “There's enough people here to vote on it.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I believe both Alderwoman Komnenos and Alderman Rosius have given their answer to you, right?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “That's right.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Two Aye.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I vote Nay.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Well if we move to vote I vote aye.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Are we moving on to the vote of this bill? Yes or no?”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second we do.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “I second.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Do you still remain on your motion to vote Alderman Cenobia?”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “I retract it, I say we move to voting.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Three motions to vote.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “We have two Aye's from Alderman Rosius and Aldermanwoman Komnenos.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius what's your say.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Nay.”

     

     Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Komnenos?”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “I vote Aye.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Cenobia?”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Lord Speaker Komnenos votes Aye.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “That makes 4.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “That's 4-2. . .”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “4 Aye to 2 nay's.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Majority has been reached.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “The cremation act will pass to the Lord Mayor.”

    Removal of The Medical Documentation Act, 1803

    Augustus Komnenos: “I know everyone is tired but we have one topic.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “The Medical Documentation Act from 1803.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I bring this topic to strike the act from local law.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “From the birth of this act it's been nothing but trouble and has been in legal limbo since 1803.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “So you're proposing we remove it?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “That I am.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I motion we vote on it.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “I second.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Voting shall start with Alderman Rosius.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “Nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Komnenos.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Cenobia.”

     

    Akello Cenobia: “Nay.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Lord Speaker Komnenos vote Aye's.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Welcome back Alderman Rosius.”

     

    Otis de Rosius took his seat. “I'm back, my apologies, again.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Your just in the neck of time.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “If your brother would pass you his sheet.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Were currently voting on the stricken The Medical Documentation Act of 1803 from local law.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “We are voting, correct?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “That's correct.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “Rosius votes Aye.”


     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Three Nay and Two Aye.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “It will go to the absentee.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Majority has not been reached.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Topic will be sent to Absentee voting.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I open the floor to any other topic may it be Alderman or others.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Rosius on the right has the floor.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “Very quick, have we voted on the Revised Tax Proposal of 1810 and the Sanitation Act yet?”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “I don't see any of them on topic.”

     

    Otis de Rosius: “Ok, I will resubmit them for the next meeting, I mustn't take up any more of our time.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alderman Komnenos has any of the topics been submitted before hand but never brought up.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “Only topics that should've been on the agenda was the cremation and tax act.”

     

    Otis de Rosius nodded. “Alright, I motion to end the meeting.”

     

    Valent de Rosius: “I second that.”

     

    Carter Komnenos II: “I second.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Alright, Alderman Rosius until next time you can resubmit the topics and I will make sure they are placed on the list.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “All is in favour of ending this session.”

     

    Augustus Komnenos: “Thank you all for coming.”

  9. "This is not even legal to do, the moj has no right to say whats illegal or legal if its not covered by law, frankly to see this makes me sad to see how bad it has gotten within the ministry" * Henrik would say to himself while reading the ordianace

  10. THE CENTRAL CIRCUIT COURT

    6th of sun's smile, 1811

     

    In accordance with the Legal Procedure Act, Henrik Komnenos, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, acting within the jurisdiction of the Central Circuit Court, does duly assign himself to these proceedings. Accordingly, the assigned Justice shall schedule a the day of the court case with the Plaintiff and the Defendant in order to review the merits of the case and decide if the matter shall be allowed to proceed to trial.

     

    The following parties are to contact Justice Komnenos to arrange a suitable date to present themselves before the Court:

     

    - The Plaintiff [@sergisala] Solicitor General Charles Galbraith on behalf of the Crown.

     

    - The Defendant Robert Helvets and his representative [ @TheIchorDruid ] Gwynevere Ameliya Kasparov

     

    The following parties are required to perform the following actions for the sake of procedure:

     

    - The Defendant is obliged to present to the Court a Replying Affidavit at least one saint day before the time of the trial, outlining their responses to the alleged crimes.

     

    - Both parties are to exchange their Books of Evidence and submit them to the Court at least one saint day before the trial is to occur.


     

×
×
  • Create New...