- Popular Post
-
Posts
1627 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Posts posted by yopplwasupxxx
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
THE SPRING CONTINGENCY
“Woah now! Hold it steady!”
One of the many laborers cried to another. They were busy strapping large, heavy crates, filled with all assortments of ore and wealth, to the back of a burly, large ox. Many of these oxen lined the rocky Sedan Pass. The land had not been this bustling with activity since before construction on Castle Sedan began all those years ago.
The old, fat Master of Sedan looked over the preparations going on before him, flanked by his sons Alexander and Peter. The sight saddened him, in truth- though they began rallying forces, nearly half were unable to fight thanks to some obscure, strange force. Although the source of this black magick remained unknown to him, he could not help but suspect that some strange, Imperial trickery was responsible.
Such was hard, yes, but issues always arise. To win this war, it would have to be his men who set the rules of engagement, not the Empire. A realignment will be made and justice will be had.
The Fat Goat of Sedan gazed to the sky. Justice will be had, but only if they played this intelligently. Passion alone does not win wars. Through persistence, they will overcome these obstacles laid before them.
They just need to change the way they play the game.
With a flick of his wrist, he motioned to the two beside him to begin.
——
The baggage train moved steadily northward, with what was Castle Sedan burning in hellfire behind them. The Goats moved onwards, marching their way towards the northern expanse of Haense.
46 -
One of the most levelheaded and capable people I’ve had the pleasure of meeting on this server, Birdnerdy is a perfect choice for moderation. +1
5 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
SEDAN DECLARES HER INDEPENDENCE
Let it be known that on this day of 13th of the Amber Cold, the Principality of Sedan, having severed all ties with the Holy Orenian Empire, declares itself a free and independent state.
Henceforth, the following decrees are issued:
-Sedan will now style itself as the Principality of Sedan, a title befitting the blood of Kings and Emperors that courses through the veins of our ruling house, the de Joannes.
-The Principality of Sedan rejects the Orenian Revised Code of 1762. All legal affairs, civil and criminal, are to be handled directly by Prince Louis I in his court.
-In accordance with its independence, the Principality of Sedan denies the authority of Emperor Joseph II to collect taxes, confiscate property, or issue evictions on our soil. Hence, the Imperial Proclamation of 1810 and the Order for the Confiscation of Sedan are rejected, not being binding on our Principality or its citizens.
-GOD BE WITH US-
72 -
You are stupid if you do not accept him +1
4 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
CHAPTER OF SAINT ALEXANDER AND THE HOLY GOAT
‘THE GOATS OF SEDAN’
“THROUGH GOD, WE WILL OVERCOME”
(God. 6:3)
REJECT THE SINS OF MODERNITY AND TRANSCEND
Step into any fetid metropolis and take a single breath- the miasma fills your lungs, as if weights bear you down. The secular has come in vogue, the virtues of old dismantled in the name of progress. But winds are changing, even the lame can sense it. The second Age of Heroes fast approaches: but will you stand tall in the coming yuga, or cower in the pleasured coddling of modernity?
Many do not have what it takes to ascend in the latter days. But purification of the soul, the transmutation of sin into glory, can be achieved. To do so requires sacrifice, a libation given in honor for God’s Love. And what is the greatest gift to Him if not one’s very body, the hand-crafted vessel He Designed? Craft yourself into a temple worthy of His Love, mold your mind into a tabernacle capable of His Wrath.
Through the pursuit of martial excellence, by the charism of initiation, you can transcend past the material plane and into the fields of Divine Ecstasy. Give yourself to the inner spark within your soul and all shall be laid bare in the Glory of the Creator.
PURIFY THE SOUL AND WALK THE SEVEN SKIES
AS YOUR FATHERS DID BEFORE YOU
“I BOWED MY HEAD AND WORSHIPPED THE MAJESTY OF MY FATHER WHO SENT ME — FOR I HAD DONE HIS WILL, AND HE TOO HAD DONE WHAT HE PROMISED — AND THE GATES OF HIS KINGDOM OPENED, AND I MINGLED WITH HIS PRINCES, FOR HE REJOICED IN ME AND RECEIVED ME, AND I WAS WITH HIM IN HIS KINGDOM.”
(Owyn 6:1-4)
-----
THE LESSER AND GREATER ALEXANDRINE INITIATION
“AND NO PLACE IS FORBIDDEN TO THOSE PERFECTED IN THE EYES OF GOD, FOR THE WICKED ARE VANQUISHED FOREVER.”
(Aus. 3:10)
[Redacted]
The mysteries of the Alexandrine Initiation are a closely-guarded secret of the Goats of Sedan, revealed only to the most loyal and experienced brothers.
-----
RANKS OF THE CHAPTER OF THE HOLY GOAT
The Inner Council of Bailiffs
CHANCELLOR-AND-PROPRIETOR - The de jure leader and figurehead of the chapter, Chancellor-and-Proprietor is the final say of command and authority. Typically, however, the Chancellor-and-Proprietor is mainly tasked with representing the order both to the Church and foreign nation-states in cases of diplomacy as well as the maintenance of properties and lands controlled by the order.
The current Chancellor-and-Proprietor is Ser Louis de Joannes.
KNIGHT-COMMANDER - Second-in-command, the Knight-Commander is in charge of keeping the Knight-Constable, Color-Bearer, and Master-Conservator stay in the right, as well as to lead in conflicts.
The current Knight-Commander is Ser Alexander de Joannes.
KNIGHT-CONSTABLE - Marked with the golden whip of office, the Knight-Constable is third-in-command and tasked with the important task of drilling and training both recruits and brothers alike.
The current Knight-Constable is Ser Lukas Castile.
COLOR-BEARER - The honor of carrying the chapter’s war banner into battle is reserved for the most capable warrior within the order at one time, named the Color-Bearer.
The current Color-Bearer is Ser Owyn de Joannes.
MASTER-CONSERVATOR - As chief quartermaster and lord of logistics, the Master-Conservator’s role is to keep in order the vast stockpiles and resources the chapter maintains.
The current Master-Conservator is Ser Peter de Joannes.
Ranks of the Chapter
EQUESTOR - The Knight of the Chapter is truly a fearless knight, and secure on every side, for his soul is protected by the armor of faith, just as his body is protected by the armor of steel. He is thus doubly-armed, and needs neither demons nor men.
BROTHER-ARMIGER - Squire of the Chapter, known for how long they have been in the Chapter for. As most of them may be better fighters due to their age, most who hold this rank have earned it from their decades of loyalty to the Church and the Chapter.
BROTHER-CAPRANUS - Veterans of the Chapter, typically having years of experience under their belt. The Brother-Carpani are allowed to bear the iconic ‘Helm of the Ram’.
BROTHER-SERGEANT - Those who have proven their loyalty to the Church and the Chapter, Brother-Sergeants are proven fighters of the Chapter who have risen above their Brothers in ranks.
BROTHER - The core and bulk of the Chapter’s manpower, Brothers are those who have taken the first initiatory rites and have sworn themselves in holy service to their fellow peers.
RECRUIT - Inexperienced and untrained, Recruits are the neophytes of the chapter who have yet finished their first year of service or made their oath to the Chapter.
Extraordinary Ranks
MEDICUS - Those who provide medical needs to the Chapter, the Medicus rank is given to those who have proven their medical proficiencies within the Chapter, their sole job to provide their Brothers’ in the practice of medicine.
ALMONER - Any brother of the Chapter who has taken clerical vows are given the robes of the Almoner, tasked with the important duties of giving alms and aid to the poor and lame, as well as efforts in proselytization
-----
ENLISTMENT AND APPLICATION
To serve with the Goats of Sedan, one must be of at least fourteen years, a male, and a faithful member of the Church of the Canon.
[[RP]]
First Name:
Surname:
Age:
Reason for Interest:
[[OOC]]
Username:
Discord:
39 -
RP Name: Louis de Joannes
MC Name: yopplwasupxxx
Voted: Yes :)0 -
SURNAME: de Joannes
FIRST NAME: Louis
ADDRESS OF RESIDENCE: Sedan Way 1
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1750
Are you registered and eligible to vote in the Alpine District?: Yes
Do you have any other title, peerage or military service that may conflict with becoming a Member of the House of Commons, as per the Edict of Reform (1763)?: No
If yes, do you understand that you will be required to resign or abdicate from this position should you be elected to the House of Commons, and if this does not occur your seat shall be considered to be vacant?: Yes
((MC NAME)): yopplwasupxxx
8 -
Louis does not have any questions for Elisa and would go ahead in voting AYE on her confirmation as circuit court justice whenever the voting process began.
0 -
Louis votes Aye on Henrik’s confirmation.
0 -
Reserved
0 -
Louis de Joannes commends the latest thesis of his younger brother, “A brilliant piece!”
4 -
RP Name: Louis de Joannes
MC Name: yopplwasupxxx
Voted: Yes :)0 -
SURNAME: de Joannes
FIRST NAME: Louis
ADDRESS OF RESIDENCE: Sedan Way 1
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1750
Are you registered and eligible to vote in the Southern District?: Yes
Do you have any other title, peerage or military service that may conflict with becoming a Member of the House of Commons, as per the Edict of Reform (1763)?: No
If yes, do you understand that you will be required to resign or abdicate from this position should you be elected to the House of Commons, and if this does not occur your seat shall beconsidered to be vacant?: Yes
((MC NAME)): yopplwasupxxx
2 -
Louis de Joannes signs the petition.
8 -
coulda atleast asked first smh
3 -
big fan, thank you 🙏
1 -
"I give my congratulations to Mister Selm, if he does still live among us, for this victory in court. May we meet again in the field of legal battle sometime again." says the Attorney-General.
0 -
Jonah Stahl-Elendil will be remembered forever in the annals of history; he was a champion of justice and paragon of morality, and surely he shall be missed. Yet his work will live on, I pray, and continued by the righteous men who cut their teeth in the Stahl ministry. May God grant the peace Jonah so readily deserves in the final decades of his long-lived life, where he may finally rest and enjoy the fruits of his labors.
3 -
Otto the Tarcharman says a prayer to Saint Harald,
“Dear Saint Harald, angel of purity and seraph of charity,
While you bore bravely the pain of struggle and the bone-shatter of conflict, you stood unwaveringly in your faith during your hours of distress. Through Godan’s love and care, firmly stalwart were you in protecting the holy flock.
You know the pains I am suffering, the burdens which I am forced to bear- ask Godan to grant me peace and patience during my suffering. Agree with me in prayer before Godan for His Mercy, to give upon me healing and mercy that my soul craves.
In the name of Godan and the Prophets,
So Say We All (Amen).”
6 -
”Dear Ms. Ruthern,
I commend you on your efforts in attempting to chronicle the history of the New Marian language. However, there are some mistakes I wish to address, and hopefully have them corrected.
The language did not ‘advance’ under Otto II, but it was by the joint work of King Stefan, St Heinrik ((FloopTroop)), and Lord Colborn ((Julius55)) that the tongue first emerged. It was under Stefan that New Marian was made the national tongue, and it was by St Heinrik’s stern leadership that fully adapted the burgeoning royal army of those days into a New Marian structure.
Also, I have never seen any translation of the Canon Scrolls into New Marian. I do not believe any King Otto Scroll actually exists. And if it did exist, it most likely came from the translating efforts of Lord Kortrevich ((Quinn)) much later in time than by any order of an Ottonian monarch. Also, if anyone was to reform New Marian into a proper lingua orenica and not a script of formalities, it would be Robert I (who you aptly mention before) and not Otto II.
As I stated, I give congratulations on your work and hope for the best in your literary career.
Sincerely,
Otto the Tarcharman”
8 -
BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AS AMICUS CURIAE IN OPPOSITION OF PETITIONER
_____________________________
To Chief Justice Gray and the Supreme Court of the Holy Orenian Empire,
We, the Ministry of Justice as represented by the Attorney-General, submit this brief as amicus curiae in opposition to the petitioner. It is our opinion that the use of property ownership to determine citizenship by the serving Magistrate of the City of Providence (George Galbraith) was both a valid and legal procedure, and should not be called to a new election or recount. We hold this opinion on the basis of the following principle(s), doctrine(s), edict(s), and article(s) of law,
I - TYPES OF PROPERTY ARE NEITHER DEFINED NOR REGULATED WITHIN THE ORC
Nowhere in the Orenian Revised Code are types of property defined or construed. While there is a brief mention of “other properties” within the municipal charter for the City of Providence, this by no means indicates that these properties cannot also constitute as dwellings or residencies. To define and distinguish between types of property when both the Orenian Revised Code and the municipal charter of the City of Providence do not is an overstep of the court’s power and purview. All properties must be treated the same legally without substantial distinction unless done so textually by the provided law, whether from the Orenian Revised Code or the municipal charter for the City of Providence.
__________
II - THERE ARE NO LAWS PROHIBITING RESIDENCY IN ANY FORM OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL
Even if properties can be legally defined into types, there are currently no laws prohibiting individuals from living in any sort of type of property, whether it be classed as a ‘residency’, ‘shop’, and so on. For the courts to create now a prohibition on where an individual can live would be therefore the creation of a law or regulation, which is beyond the scope of the court’s jurisdiction. Rather, all properties must be accepted as being able to be residences as per both the Orenian Revised Code and the municipal charter for the City of Providence.
__________
III - POSSESSION AND USE OF A PROPERTY IS LEGAL PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP FOR A MAGISTRATE
According to the Orenian Revised Code, “[the] possession and continued use of property within the Empire for a period as so judged by a magistrate can be used as legal proof of citizenship if so requested by the citizen” (ORC 301.01B). There is no specification to what type of property, rather to property as a whole. Therefore, a magistrate can legally judge an individual as a citizen if they own property over a certain period of time that is itself determined by the magistrate. As George Galbraith was appointed Magistrate of Providence at the time of election (1797), he was well in his legal right to judge an individual’s citizenship based on property ownership. To deny him this power is a blatant breach of his legal rights and duties prescribed by the Orenian Revised Code. It would also be a breach of a citizen’s right to use property ownership as proof of their citizenship by government agents.
__________
We conclude with the following points: types of properties are not defined in either law documents, and so must be treated as having the same legal attributes. There are no laws that prohibit residency of any form of property owned by an individual, and it is the right of the Crown-appointed magistrate to use possession of a property as a legal indicator of citizenship (as well as a right of the individual to use their property as legal proof of citizenship). It is by these reasons that We, the Ministry of Justice as represented by the Attorney-General, urge the court to reject this petition and uphold the validity of the results of the 1797 municipal elections for the City of Providence.
Yours Humbly,
RT. HON. ATTORNEY-GENERAL R. A. FITZPETER, J.D. SSE
POLYCARP COURTHOUSE, 2 VINMARK ROUSSARD ST, PROVIDENCE
[[yoppl the tarchar#5195]]
5 -
BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AS AMICUS CURIAE IN OPPOSITION OF PETITIONER
_____________________________
To Chief Justice Gray and the Supreme Court of the Holy Orenian Empire,
We, the Ministry of Justice as represented by the Attorney-General, submit this brief as amicus curiae in opposition to the petitioner. It is our opinion that the coin toss held in the 1797 elections for the ‘Lord Mayor’ of the City of Providence is not in violation of either the Orenian Revised Code or the municipal charter for the City of Providence. We hold this opinion on the basis of the following principle(s), doctrine(s), edict(s), and article(s) of law,
I - THE COIN TOSS HAS LEGAL PRECEDENCE IN IMPERIAL ELECTIONS
Coin tosses are not a new occurrence and have been used in Imperial elections previously. During the 1775 elections for the 14th Session of the House of Commons, a coin toss was used by the Ministry of Civil Affairs to settle an electoral tie between candidates O’Rourke and O’Rourke. The outcome of this election was not contested by either parliamentary party nor any private citizen and organization. The use of the coin toss in this instance has therefore created a proper precedence for future elections to follow. There has been no legal or cultural indication since this election that the use of the coin toss does not follow proper regulations and guidelines.
As for an instance used in other societies that later formed core divisions of the modern empire: in 1721, the Republic of Ves (in a region that would be later incorporated into the province of Kaedrin) settled a tie for the election of a censure by means of a coin toss, overseen by the presiding-prince Ide Haraccus. This example shows that the use of the coin toss is not a new occurrence culturally and is rather a commonly-accepted standard to break ties for elections in human-cultured regions.
These two examples show two facts: firstly, that the coin toss has been established previously as a proper method in deciding a tie vote on the national level. Secondly, the use of a coin toss has also been established as being a cultural standard that is implicitly followed and called upon when situations such as these arise.
_______
II - VOTING SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURE ARE NOT REGULATED BY THE ORC AND INSTEAD DETERMINED BY MINISTERIAL AND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES
The procedure and method of voting and elections are not regulated or outlined by the Orenian Revised Code; therefore both the Ministry of Civil Affairs and the municipal government of Providence are allowed to maintain their own voting systems and guidelines. The only qualifications regarding elections is that, if they are to be held, that they are done ‘fairly, openly, and freely’ (ORC 609.09D) or in the municipality’s sake, ‘free and fair’ (City of Providence Charter). There is no instance within either the Orenian Revised Code or the municipal charter of the City of Providence that explicitly or implicitly bars the use of a coin toss to determine a tie in a government-held election. Therefore, as long as a coin toss used to determine an election is considered ‘fair’, ‘free’, and ‘open’, it is a valid process within an election held by either the Ministry of Civil Affairs or the municipal government of Providence and well within their power to use such a method.
_______
III - THE COIN TOSS IS LEGALLY FAIR, FREE, AND OPEN
We shall construe fair as to mean that which is in accordance to legal precedence and cultural standards, as well as in treating each voting citizen in such a way that meets these rules and standards. As previously stated, the coin toss has been used before, following both a legal precedent (it was used in 1775, a mere twenty-two years ago) and culture standards (its been used in pre-Imperial societies, such as Ves in 1721). This rule was applied equally to every citizen; no votes were unfairly counted as being of greater or lesser value. Instead, the electoral stalemate instigates a tie-breaking procedure (such as the coin toss) that follows legal precedence. The coin toss not involving voting in of itself does not necessitate that it is unfair: as every voting citizen is subjected to it, and no other individual or party can manipulate the outcome, the procedure treats both the citizen and their vote fairly. The use of a coin toss to determine a tied election therefore is a fair procedure and does not conflict with either the Orenian Revised Code or the municipal charter of the City of Providence.
We shall construe free as to mean that which is not under the control or influence of another individual or party, as well as being done without manipulation and instead with proper oversight. The coin toss was done with a generic, unaltered coin approved by the ministry, candidates, and other participants, along with numerous different agents committed to oversight over the procedure. These agents included members of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the municipal government, the candidates, and the many supporters for both candidates. Because the coin toss was completely random, there was no outside influence which could have manipulated the results. The use of a coin toss to determine a tied election therefore is a free procedure and does not conflict with either the Orenian Revised Code or the municipal charter of the City of Providence.
We shall construe open as to mean that which is not blocked or constricted from view or access, specifically that the procedure and results are reasonably exposed to the public without hindrance. The coin toss held was done in the open and in the presence of both voters and candidates. In no way was view or access to the coin hindered by agents of the government and any voting citizen was able to see at their inclination. The results of the coin toss were also always available to the public without any unnecessary redaction. The use of a coin toss to determine a tied election therefore is an open procedure and does not conflict with either the Orenian Revised Code or the municipal charter of the City of Providence.
_______
We conclude with the following points: the coin toss is an established, legal precedent and method within the electoral process and follows the necessary qualifications (being fair, free, and open) required by both the Orenian Revised Code and the municipal charter for the City of Providence. It is by these reasons that We, the Ministry of Justice as represented by the Attorney-General, reject the petition and uphold the validity of the coin toss in determining tied elections.
Yours Humbly,
RT. HON. ATTORNEY-GENERAL R. A. FITZPETER, J.D. SSE
POLYCARP COURTHOUSE, 2 VINMARK ROUSSARD ST, PROVIDENCE
[[yoppl the tarchar#5195]]
4 -
“A fantastic ruling from the Gray Court.” says Leo.
1 -
“Making more public posts won’t change anything. Make a summons and bring it to court or drop this charade of garnering public pity.” says Leo.
4
Four Prophets or Five Prophets?
in Canonist Theses
Posted
Four Prophets or Five Prophets?
By Pseudo-Clement
Are there four prophets or five prophets? Mainstream Canonist theology says four, and logic at first glance supports this conclusion- there are four scrolls, hence four prophets. God even told Horen that He would grant the world after him “three sons of Spirit” (Gsp 2:72).
Yet what if I told you there could, in actuality, be five prophets, and that this mysterious figure can be found within the Canon itself? Do not worry, I am not speaking of any future eschatological or messianic personages (sorry Lendians). Rather, this prophet has already walked the earth and his scroll is perhaps the most popular of any of the traditional four.
I speak of course of the Primordial Man.
This essay shall argue the existence of a fifth prophet in the figure of the Primordial Man found in chapter 1 of the Scroll of Gospel, who fulfills all qualifications of Prophethood, namely (1) ascension to the Sixth Sky, (2) performance of miracles, (3) has received divine prophecy or revelation, (4) teaches in some capacity, (5) rules or occupies some position of societal responsibility, (6) is related to previous and/or future prophets, and (7) exhibits extraordinary piety and virtue in their life.
I will attempt to be as brief as possible, and I have cut considerable content from the original document in order to define my point as concisely as possible. I do not aim to preach heresy, rather to view the Canon as given before us and view the Truth which God gave us. I hope this thesis may develop discussion and debate within the faithful Canonist community. My only intention is to start productive conversations about the theology, philosophy, and doctrines of the Canonist Church.
Defining Prophethood
In order to judge our candidate for prophethood, we must determine what a prophet is. By comparing our four extant prophets, I have boiled down seven common traits found across the quaternary, which I believe constitutes the signs of legitimate prophethood. These are:
Part 1: The Primordial Man
The references of the Primordial Man within the Canon are brief and sparse, but provide very crucial and important information in trying to understand this enigmatic figure. He was created alongside the Primordial Woman close to the time of Creation, made from clumps of earth and given “blood and breath, and the light of wisdom” (Gsp 1:28). Both of them were virtuous, and God ordered them as the ‘Firsts’, the Primus and Prima, and they bore no skills of language and had no true, proper names (Gsp 1:29). They were His “favoured creations” (Gsp 1:30), and under His care they prospered (Gsp 1:31), remaining “faithful to their Creator, and did as He bid” (Gsp 1:32). The Primordial Man took the co-created woman as his wife and had four sons (Gsp 1:33), named Malin (Gsp 1:34-35), Urguan (1:36-37), Krug (Gsp 1:38-39), and Horen (Gsp 1:40-41). Eventually, both the Primordial Man and Woman were called to join God in the Sixth Sky (Gsp 1:42), which the man did so willingly and in great reverence (Gsp 1:43). The Primordial Woman chose love of her children over God (Gsp 1:44), leading to God humbling her (Gsp 1:46) through “[uncovering] the imperfections of the Sons” (Gsp 1:45). She would finally join her husband in the Sixth Sky soon after (Gsp 1:47).
My first listed qualification for prophethood was ascension to the Sixth Sky, which the Primordial Man not only did, but was the first of any being to ever do so. All of the four prophets entered the Sixth Sky: Owyn (Gsp 5:22) and Godfrey (Gsp 7:66) and the rest according to tradition. The Catechism of the Canonist Church directly calls the Sixth Sky the realm of “the Exalted and their wives”.
One must note that Owyn’s entrance into the skies is specifically referred to as joining his “grandfather’s father” (Gsp 5:22), that is, the Primordial Man. By this, Sixth Sky is called directly by the Divine as the realm of the Primordial Man (the Scroll of Gospel, like the Scroll of Virtue, were delivered wholesale by God through his messenger aenguls, unlike the Scroll of Spirit and Auspice, which were transcribed by their respective prophets in explaining experiencing or teachings they had, more on this in Part 2). Therefore, by the Primordial Man’s inclusion in the Sixth Sky, he must hold a position like ‘Exalted’, if we are to atleast follow the tradition of St. Daniel VII and his magnum opus.
Part 2: The Wordless Scroll
If the Primordial Man is an Exalted, where is his scroll? Every prophet has a scroll, whether revealed directly (Virtue, Gospel) or indirectly (Spirit, Auspice). I argue that the Primordial Man did leave a scroll- that is, a nameless scroll called “Tradition” or “Praxis or Method of Faith”. To explain this will require some explanation, so please bear with me.
The first argument against this line of thinking is that Tradition simply was given by the prophets, more specifically Horen. However, this is impossible, for a few reasons.
First, the tradition of building temples (Gsp 2:13) and having tabernacles (Gsp 2:19) pre-exists Horen’s receiving the blessing of revelation by being anointed in the Waters of Gamesh (Gsp 2:34-39). This means that there was primordial praxis in worship, which had to come from somewhere before Horen’s call to prophethood. I argue that this must have developed from the Primordial Man in his role as teacher (see Part 4). The teachings of these practices come from God Himself; remember, before the uncovering of the Sons by the Primordial Woman’s folly, and the Primordial Man had complete and unadulterated access to the Grace and Love of God (see Part 7). I should also state that the creation of the priesthood through Evaristus and Clement (Gsp 5:3-5) does not necessitate that a praxis or method of faith did not preexist this moment; the practice of prayer and worship predate the existence of the formal priesthood.
Second, the concept of being “faithful” is mentioned as being practiced not only by Horen (Gsp 1:41), but also previously by the Primordial Man (Gsp 1:31). Therefore, if we classify faith as acting in Love of God (pious, virtuous, etc.) and henceforth a method or action, this action must originate from a source. And as Horen again had not been called to prophethood, he must have learned from an extant source- that is, his father the Primordial Man. As I mentioned before, the method of faith is shown to exist before the birth of any of the Sons. This method of faith is the Fundamental Tradition.
But why then was this revelation or practice not written not like the other scrolls? The Primordial Man had no language or name- his revelation came through acting through His plan (Gsp 1:30). Prophets mark their prophecy by being anointed with the Waters of Gamesh (Gsp 2:35; 4:22; 6:22; 7:46); one should note that not only the Primordial Man had access to bathe and anoint himself in the Waters of Gamesh, he drank “the sweet water” directly (Gsp 1:31). By this symbolism, we can infer that the Primordial Man had the ability not only to reveal the Plan of God, but he acted in it. The Waters of Gamesh practically coursed through his very veins.
The methods and practices he developed to be faithful to God- that is, the practice of prayer, worship, devotion, piety, what have you- became his scroll: the Wordless Scroll of Tradition. A concept similar to this is the Qali concept of Sunnah; or how the practices and praxis of worship of their prophets stand of equal status to their revealed scripture.
A crucial part of this symbolism is how the Wordless Scroll/Tradition qualifies as both direct revelation and indirect revelation. By doing as He bid (Gsp 1:32), the praxis of faith of the Primordial Man is directly revealed to be the way which is most pleasing to Him. Likewise, because the Primordial Man is a creation and not God, the practices which he develops are inherently exoteric and therefore indirectly revealed. The Wordless Scroll is a fulfillment of both the esoteric and the exoteric, the Absolute and the Infinite, the direct and the indirect. God is both One yet All.
Part 3: Words from the Wordless
Another important marker of prophethood is miracles- a sign of a saint, for example, is the performance of miracles (Catechism of the Canonist Church). All the prophets performed miracles: Horen and his miracle of the Pure Aura (Gsp 1:42-43), Owyn and the miracle of Lux Invicta (Gsp 5:19-20), Godfrey and the Ascension (Gsp 7:66), and Sigismund and the Holy Revelations (see the Scroll of Auspice). What then were the miracles of the Primordial Man? Can we discern any? I argue that through the Canon, we know of two extremely powerful miracles performed by him.
Both miracles are intertwined in one action: the birth of the Four Sons, specifically in how they have names. Remember, the Primordial Man and Woman knew no language or had no names, yet the grant of names to the Four Sons clearly falls before the Primordial Woman’s folly. There is therefore a paradox: if the Primordial Man or Woman had no language, how could they give their children verbal names?
The first miracle is therefore the ability of the Primordial Man to utter and grant these names to his children: despite the lack of proper linguistic tongue, he was able to conceive and create ordered syllabus with purpose and meaning. In the Wordless, the Primordial Man through the Grace of God made Word.
The second miracle is more nuanced. Why did the Primordial Man give the Four Sons names in the first place? I argue this is because of a miracle of divine prophecy- the Primordial Man knew through the Grace of God of the Primordial Woman’s folly and therefore the bestowment of the curse of identity upon the Four Sons and their later tribes. By giving name, he gave the transition of his children from complete lack of identity to having worldly identity smoother, but also taught through the Wordless Scroll (see Part 2) that such exoterism can still prove faithful to God. God giving revelation of future events is not a new concept in Canonism (see the Scroll of Auspice for example).
Part 4: The First Teacher
All prophets have been teachers in some capacity; Horen retaught the teachings of God to the people after being led astray by Saul (Gsp 1:39, 47), Owyn taught through epistles gathered in the Scroll of Spirit, Godfrey “pronounced the word of God into the hearts of men” (Gsp 6:34), and Sigismund shall cast aside the teachings of the idolaters in favor for that of Canonism (Gsp 7:52). Did the Primordial Man too act as a teacher?
As previously stated, the Wordless Scroll is Tradition or the practices of the Primordial Man in worshiping and acting faithful to God. These were passed down to Horen, which formed the basis of future worship as we do today. This “passing down” could only have happened if the Primordial Man taught Horen (and therefore the other three sons as well) the method of faith. In this way, the Primordial Man acted as a teacher.
A symbol of the Primordial Man as a teacher can be seen in the birth of Clement and Evaristus. According to popular legend, they are twins which “tousled in the womb”, though coming from one essence. This is a parallel to the creation of the Primordial Man and Woman- likewise, they two came from one earth and granted the same gifts of breath, blood, and wisdom. The brothers acted as teachers to the masses still scarred by the destruction of first Saul and then Harren, much like how the Primordial Man and Woman taught to the Four Sons how to live faithfully and in pure intention to God.
Part 5: The First Patriarch
Each prophet has been a ruler in some capacity; Horen was the first King of Mankind (Gsp 1:50), Owyn claimed the kingship in order to contest his wicked uncle Harren (Gsp 4:40-42), Godfrey united the realms of humanity into an empire (Gsp 7:16), and Sigismund reunited his predecessor’s realm (Gsp 7:50-52). Did the Primordial Man rule or hold kingship in some capacity?
The Primordial Man, in his role as the patriarch of the First Family, exhibits the roles of kingship which every ruler follows implicitly. Being the first of God’s creation that held the light of wisdom and the privilege to be His favoured beings, even above the Aengudamons. He acted as steward of the lands and also as patriarch to his family; symbolically, the Four Sons submitted to this patriarch, which is the only time when Elf (Malin), Dwarf (Urguan), Ork (Krug), and Human (Horen) lived in one united polity- a potent spiritual image.
Another note is the quote “So the Lord was pleased to lay His favor upon the sons of His first man and woman, and he called the pair forth to reside in the Sixth Sky and give the World over to the dominion of the Sons” (Gsp 1:42). By the phrase “give the World over to the dominion of the Sons”, it is inferred that the dominion of the World was in some capacity held by the Primordial Man and Woman and that it was theirs to “give”.
Part 6: The Father of All
All the prophets are related to each other by direct blood relation. Owyn, Godfrey, and Sigismund are all descendants of Horen. The Primordial Man falls into this tradition: he is the father of Horen, and therefore the parent of all prophets. Not only that, the Primordial Man is the sire of all the descendant races, and therefore bears the dignity of ‘Father of All’.
Part 7: Grace Unhampered
The prophets lived and/or performed deeds of great virtue and piety: Horen led the descendants to renounce the machinations of Iblees (Gsp 1:47-66), Owyn repented in severe acts of obedience of God in order to purify his soul through the miracle of Lux Invicta (Gsp 5:19-22), Godfrey humbled himself before God despite his vast lands and power (Gsp 7:64), and Sigismund brought forth mercy in royal judgement (Gsp 7:54). Did the Primordial Man act in virtue and piety?
As previously mentioned, he did act “faithful to their Creator, and did as He bid” (Gsp 1:32). In all references within the scrolls, the Primordial Man is shown to be the pinnacle of faith, virtue, and piety. Even the Primordial Man did not bear the Primordial Woman’s folly, for he had fear in God and joined him despite his love for the Four Sons. Not only did the Primordial Man act in God, he is perhaps the closest model in complete surrender and faith to God. He is the transcendent symbol of faith for all descendants.