-
Posts
296 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Posts posted by Thornz
-
-
7 minutes ago, 吳憾戰士14 said:
If RP happened that affected your character personally then I'd say go for it, gather some friends and get your revenge if it makes sense in RP. However, still bare in mind its not an excuse to raid someone over and over every day.
0There are other rp reasonings that could compel your character to attack a settlement or constantly target a group. They could be actively trying to attack those affiliated with the empire, or perhaps they are just greedy thieves and bandits going to plunder and raid others.
A player shouldn't be restricted on who he raids if the victims complain they are "being raided or targeted too much". As long as the villain is performing good roleplay, is rule abiding, and is not being toxic, they should not deserve punishment. The rules are already bad enough towards antagonists as is.
1 -
I don't understand how attacking a group too much warrants a villainy blacklist.
1 -
Mah'r would frown and shake his head at hearing of the treaty being signed.
6 -
Asmund Grimlee would vote for Tyroth, not having seen him in a while, yet still having an odd faith in him.
2 -
Asmund Grimlee would frown and sadden at hearing the news of Donovan's illness but would continue out to Norland with his older brother, Uther.
3 -
I agree with this proposal.
Although I really would make cooldowns shorter.
1 -
Mah'r quickly gets his quill and signs.
3 -
-
I'm so short, I couldn't find my way to the battle.
1 -
That would be a +1 on _ZootopianPride_
3 -
courlanders preparing for war
2 -
I can confirm they duped the items and then sold them to me.
2 -
Gerbil approves this message
1 -
join our zootopia cult https://www.rabb.it/r/cprinz
1 -
I think I've found my spirit animal.
11 -
R A I D R U L E S
RAIDRULES
R
a
i
d
ru
l
e
s
1 -
"Lucky bastard got out alive without me having a go At him." Mah'r would grumble while hearing word of the news.
0 -
+1 For sure would make good et
1 -
Reliable guy, for sure a +1!
0 -
What’s the name of the Minecraft account you're applying for?: Gubbins_
What's your MAIN Minecraft Account name?: McThornz
Do you agree to follow the rules on your new account?: Yes
Do you understand you cannot have both of these accounts interacting with one another? This will result in a ban if you are caught!: Yes
Do you understand that if one account is banned, so will be the other(s)?: that's a yes.
How long have you been on LotC?: Since October 2015
How many accounts do you currently have whitelisted (including main)?: c'est 2
0 -
Mah'r Volaren would have a smug appearance shown from his facial expression as he heard that the Northerners had gotten word of Henrik's murder by Brawm bannermen.
0 -
"Since when was this land their's to give?" Mah'r would say as he perked a brow. "This man should be left to his town and his town only: Mjöl"
0 -
On a scale of 1 to 10, how autistic do you rate yourself?
0 -
5 minutes ago, _Jandy_ said:
Do you hate halflings for their size or their generally cheery attitude?
Both
2
Blacklists & Lockpicks.
in News & Announcements Archive
Posted
Well if a settlement is being raided by bandits, then the settlement should do something about it within roleplay and not complain about being frequently targeted. If the roleplay is poor or the villains constantly pressure the others to pvp then yes, they are performing substandard roleplay. This inadequate roleplay is what should warrant a blacklist and not the frequency of attacks. After all, raid timers give a settlement time to relax and take a break from hostile actions.
Banditry of roads should also be able to be performed at free will, and the bandit minority should be allowed to sit on roads without fear of being punished for "harassing a group too often".
I think that as long as bandits provide sufficient and decent roleplay then they should be entitled to raid and bandit as long as it is within the current raiding and banditry regulations.
I would also like to point out that a GM is capable of handing out a blacklist regardless if the player followed rules: "It should also be noted that if a player is close to breaking the rules and a GM feels that a blacklist is still warranted, they are such allowed to do so."