Jump to content

excited

Creative Wizard
  • Posts

    8429
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by excited

  1. 2 minutes ago, Ibn Khaldun said:

    I wholly support removing sexual FTB and removing this would be an example of blocking the means as it is something that has been abused to "play the field" and see who is vulnerable and/or willing to "let down their guard" and abhorrent to me (obviously this is a personal position dictated by my personal morals).

    I think a number of players on the server might benefit from re-evaluating how they approach roleplay. There are certain mechanics that really do not need to be "addressed" or "played out" to build out the fictional narratives they are personally a part of or encompass their participation. This includes urination, reproduction, and sleep (as in, you don't need to sit logged in for your healthy 6 hours of sleep). Sexual FTB is not a necessity and to set a culture for the server - should be removed so that everyone gets the message that they shouldn't even venture near "the sexual" on this particular server.

     

    This is very articulate and is something I support. 

  2. 1 minute ago, Diogen said:


    very well said, it's pretty ******* weird to see someone in their late 20s romancing and ftbing someone in their early teens, regardless of whether their intentions are pure or not. should be a thing to disallow people far in age from doing such unless both are consenting adults

     

    It's the responsibility at that point of the adult to recognize that a parasocial relationship of any kind with a minor in that context might not be "real", but the implications of it are very much real. It's such a can of worms to open that - you just shouldn't do it honestly. Rules supporting it would not serve to mitigate grooming (grooming happens as a result of an adult of the age of majority manipulating somebody in the age of minority to solicit photos, a relationship, or sexts - it is very nefarious and is caught on main server, so people do it over external communication outlets) so much as it serves to mitigate irresponsible role-play and the irresponsible implications of those forms of RP. 

  3. 1 minute ago, TreeSmoothie said:

     

    I agree and I disagree. I've been groomed on this server like 4 times, and each time it started with them going ((wanna ftb btw...?- I didn't say what I said out of assumptions. It isn't the direct cause of it, but it's like getting tetanus from a rusty knife. The initial cut didn't kill you, but it caused things to happen that wouldn't have if you hadn't been cut.

     

    So this guy followed up with you FTBing with "I'm going to fly you out"? Call the police at that point. That's disgusting. 

  4. 3 hours ago, Mannamannaa said:

    Kor'garr the Clanless, moments before drinking grog in the Betharuz tavern, furrows his brow upon hearing the news. Glinty crimson eyes stare in confusion at the small goblin informing him of events in the Human lands to the East.

    "Hmm, enturyztyng tu heer. Thankz vor dah invo." He tosses a small lump of silver at the ecstatic goblin before pulling out his notes, already drafting up his initial impressions of what he has just heard. Perhaps another headline has arrived...

     

      Hide contents

    Can this be directly referenced in other public posts or is it a PoV do not meta type of explanation?

     


    (You may reference it. This is the Loyalist Partisans' account of the war.) 

  5. Sir Paul Montalt added an homage to one of his ledgers.

     

    Dame Livia the Stubborn 

     

    Sir Brandt the Unyielding

     

    Civil war, it was a tragic thing. Paul had fought three of them in his long life. Now, the sister of his long dead friend Emilio at last joined her brother in the rich Petran soil, as did Sir Brandt - both loyal to their Archduke, and rebellious by nature. For that, Paul offered them his respect, but contemplated how many others would have to die before the enemy would sue for peace.

    Paul said to his daughter, "Never take solace in war." He said from the ramparts, "Loyalty to The Penny Duke has cost too many already. Live a quiet life, a happy one. When I am gone, do not mourn my loss, for men such as me have shaped this ghastly world you children will inherit. I am sorry, my dear." 

  6. 6 hours ago, Andustar said:

    Albert Salvian prayed before the alter of St. Emma of Woldzimir, the conflict having taken its toll on the young lord's innocence.
    "May GOD have mercy upon all who take up arms. My duty is to my people, and I shan't rejoice in the loss of anyone, be they sworn to my Mother or my Father."

     

     

    On the opposite side of the field, at the Castle of Temesch et Moere, Sir Paul Montalt "The Unspoken" stared through his visor across at the other half of the city of Valfleur. His gauntlet uplifted before his face, and he stared at his worn leather palm. He had killed Dame Livia with his own hands. The price of his oaths was beginning to catch up to him, Sir Paul Montalt, once Squire Pavel Barrow, lamented. And no matter what he could not stop seeing the blood as it dribbled from his fingers. It was stuck to him forever now, just as once he had slain the Lord Carrion's son when he was himself but a squire of twelve-years-old. Was it fated? He thought to himself. For me to be this way? 

    "There is but one Archduchess," he said wistfully, now fifty-five years of age. He had killed now hundreds of men, with his own hands or by way of his designs. The Commander of the PRF readied himself for his next fight. 

  7. Just now, MaltaMoss said:

    Valentin Mareno, sworn protector of Renilde I eyes the missive with great distrust.

    "Paul, I've come to fulfill my end of the deal. Your posthumous payments kept me afloat all these years, I suppose I've a job to do." 

     

    Paul Montalt, Knight of the Eagle, ended his wanderlust. 

    "Glad to see you, old friend. We shall defend his daughter together, as was our sacrosanct Oath to our fallen friend Paul Temesch. We shall rip the consort limb from limb for his treachery."

  8. Being a transgender man doesn't erase being able to be misogynistic. After a vote, Moderation has deduced this appeal is insufficient and expresses no remorse for the people you've attacked and made uncomfortable. Furthermore, it's been established you've a routine of disparaging women out-of-character as well. If your concept of "dynamic role-play" is dusting off the Cheeto dust from your fingers and making remarks in-characterly that make people out-of-characterly discomforted, namely as it pertains to their sex and gender, that is a personal failing because you've not done your due diligence to read the room. If it was just RP, you wouldn't be banned right now is the truth, so take some time to reflect on your actions and return with an appeal that doesn't look like some ego defense you wrote in five minutes.

     

    Many people come from many different backgrounds. I know firsthand many women on LoTC who have been routinely treated with cruelty under the guise of it just being role-play, because it is a solid way for somebody to deflect personal accountability. You have been a negative member of LoTC whose behavior has negatively impacted other people, so make the change and prove that you're worthwhile and can bring a good attitude to the server.

     

    Dynamic role-play isn't some Bill Burr bit where you beat a female player silly in a domestic violence situation with a can-opener without consent. Dynamic role-play is recognizing there are consequences for your role-play.

    Maybe it's about time you recognized those consequences for real. 

    Denied.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...