Jump to content

Supremacy

Creative Wizard
  • Posts

    4167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Supremacy

  1. Thank you. Edit Sept 23: More work required option removed. In order to express more work required from now on please vote no as this lore is now being sent for review and thus the vote would be no.
  2. Where did you go Polgrath XD I still need owner perms on the new area to add people XD

  3. Care to have a read? Telekinetic lore sure is FUN! http://bit.ly/O69Duv

  4. Cool people read Telekinetic Lore: http://bit.ly/O69Duv

    1. Chikachu

      Chikachu

      Must... be... cool... *reads*

    2. Supremacy
  5. Telekinetic Lore: Help me out by reading http://bit.ly/O69Duv

  6. What do you mean? Could you clarify? If you mean Lore on discovery I had intended to leave that to those who wish to be the original few who apply with 'Lore'. However, I do have some written up from when I first started making it. If that is what you wish, I can post it.
  7. Dislike my lore I see XD

  8. The dagger issue was determined to be a non-issue in my opinion. The equivalent of throwing a dagger. As Polgrath said, if fireballs and disguises are fine, throwing a dagger would also be fine. But that is up to the MAT to balance. On an additional note 5 of the NO votes have yet to give me a reason for their votes. It isn't helpful and really If you are objecting for a reason like c360 (Not reading the lore) it isn't fair if you vote.
  9. How will this magic be useful with only one shade left in existence? At least the first spell seems limited. EDIT: Ignore my post, I was confusing 'The Shade' with 'Shade magic'.
  10. Have you read the lore? I'm sorry but from your comment you clearly have not read the lore and simply voted no on a misconception you brought into when reading it. It specifically notes that things like that can not be done. I'm sorry to be blunt, but please reread the lore and perhaps reconsider voting before you read it next time. Sorry, Kalenz (SupremacyOps)
×
×
  • Create New...