Shalashask

And it has been two months, clearly they are not going to look at it.

I don't know why they have the power to decide things like this. They shouldn't be the ones making the big decisions. It should be their job to listen to the admins and player base, not their own agendas.

@Pandan @Fireheart

My main point was multiculturalism does have its pros and cons, but if most people in a country disagree with it then it shouldn't be forced on them by foreign powers.

Also it's incredibly hard to remove refugee and migrant families from the UK once it has been proven they aren't being productive.

Fair enough. Just as a closing remarks I believe the attacks happened because of how it is seen acceptable to treat woman beneath men in the middle east and Africa. And sure, Sadiq is a Muslim but he was still raised in London, albeit by Pakistani parents. As for many people being multicultural in parliament, most aren't foreign born or born to foreign parents. They may pretend to support multiculturalism, but mass immigration just causes 'ghettoisation', making it near impossible for immigrants to integrate. 

Mixing cultures from countries with such different cultures will be a disaster. Most people in the UK think multiculturalism has failed. If most of our population don't want it, we shouldn't be forced to accept them because the EU tells us to. Can I ask if you think these attacks happened because of the culture these migrants grew up in, or because of resistance to immigration?
( btw Did you hear the Mayor of Colognes statement after the attacks?)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/06/cologne-attacks-mayor-women-keep-men-arms-length-germany

And sure, more immigrants probably will increase the UK's GDP, but that doesn't mean standards of living will increase. Our public school and health systems infrastructure cannot cope with the rapid increase in net population growth. 

As for the refugee stats, I'm talking about the men who live in the camps in Calais trying to enter Britain, not the ones already here.
 

And why is it our responsibility to 'not ruin their lives'? A countries main priority should be to protect its own. If they increase the crime rate and cost our country money it is perfectly acceptable to turn them away.

And most people travelling to Europe are not Syrian refugee families, they are migrant men from Sudan and Afghanistan.

Syrians are not Irish. Their culture is vastly different from ours, just look at what happened in Cologne on new years eve.

Why should we be forced it take in refugees? Most of the people living in the Calais jungle are migrant men who aren't even from Syria. 

I agree that a common Euro-army wouldn't work, but it shows how much the EU has changed since we first joined.

Salad, what do you think of countries being fined for not accepting refugees? And what are your thoughts on the possibility of a common European army?

When are parents and ancestors voted to join the EU, it was a very different union back then. Just google 'EU army'. 

We will still trade with European countries if we leave, that is just remain fear mongering. The UK is one of Germany's largest importers of their cars. It makes no sense for them to introduce high tariffs.