simatra

I genuinely don't get how people read Noob's report and all the responses and still think Noob was pex abusing

>"He was TPing to nodes!" - Daisy said there was no evidence of him using perms to get to nodes
>"He was gathering in vanish!" - There's like 3 examples of him running /vanish, which is ambiguous, and could be unvanishing, and one of them he ran the command twice in a row meaning it was only for a few seconds and supports the claim that he was drunk and forgot he was already out of vanish
>"He TPed to an herb node!" - The fact that Squak even included that screenshot is highly suspect, because Daisy confirmed he hasn't collected a single herb all map, and the screenshot is literally entirely irrelevant and just construes a false narrative
>"He warped back to Urguan when he was done!" - You have a soulstone, and that isn't against the rules

Then there's the fact that Squak hadn't even run the commands to learn most of this until well after he began spreading these rumors. He had every right to remove Noob from staff and I'm not arguing against that, but all the accusations of pex abuse are complete nonsense. To claim that Squak was justified in spreading rumors about Noob pex abusing, and that it wasn't slander, is straight up absurd considering his position as an admin and the fact that there is no sign of him doing anything blatantly wrong, and according to Halt in his response, I quote: "Frankly, there are people on the ST/other teams that abuse their permissions in a worse way by my estimate.

Frankly, by these definitions and (even more blatant/common ones) I abuse my permissions too."