FoogThe2stnd

I think this is a rather fair ammendment, the only thing that I would add or mention is that while acting defensively if they can continue charging or casting. Also yes, wowj's point is also good.

Alchemy is meant to be the pure man's weapon against darkspawn and MA's that have a billion abilities and mechanics that make them unstoppable and almost impossible to root out. It is not worse, alchemy is a pain to gather materials, this is the change all the corc wanted, and complained about "player signed salt". Also bro, "the dichotomy of man", it is NEVER that serious 💀.

Wtf this is someone's life.

The imperial elf would be speaking to a silversmith, discussing with them a replacement for the broken chain of the vampiric baron’s lily cross. What was once his, now belonged to Lucis, his trophy of the battle fought alongside his Lord, Corswain.

Lucis, but a humble Feoderati, would overhear talks of this search for the young imperial during his gate house duties. Folks he knew and new faces would come and go, though he took a pause as his friends from the North had come to visit. As he left the gatehouse to meet them, he is met with someone he has never seen before in the capital. “Hello lad.”

O_O Ah. . . I am not sure, I could've sworn it said such when I first saw this a few hours ago. Though Dingo also mentioned st signage, I think femur changed it but idk, could have just had a moment.

@PrimnyaQuorumI am just asking for clarification, how is that overkill? I thought we were against 'vague lore'? It is a reasonable thing to ask while the post is fresh, perhaps a change or clarification to be made. How would I know if it would just require the herb item, you cannot get blisterbark as an herb even, only 'blisterthorn'. They are different items. And if you go down the route, that means that it gets even harder to obtain. 1x Blisterthorn traded for 1x Blisterbark item? Basically killing the piece from ever being used, the amendment while generous with some additions reads as if the last and sixth were made as the focus, because someone got ganked by their material weakness 🥀.

I will ask cause I am curious, while I have my issues with this amendment that last amendment is the one I think is the most problematic. If blisterbark would now require st-signage does that imply that stripped blisterbark become something that is only obtainable in events? If it is just a personal rp what is the limit on st signed blisterbark?