Jump to content

Lirro

Member
  • Content Count

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

44 Excellent

1 Follower

About Lirro

  • Rank
    Tree Puncher

Contact Methods

  • Minecraft Username
    Lirro

Character Profile

  • Character Name
    Lirro Dockingrock
  • Character Race
    Halfling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Lirro

    Dunshire Shogging Night! (19th Annual)

    You can shogg off
  2. Lirro

    [Your View] Charters, Nation Status and Dependent Status!

    Amount of signatures needed too low. Should all be doubled Meh, we’ll still end up with two dozen abandoned town/cities/castles by this time next year. Guaranteed.
  3. Lirro

    On Shelving - LT

    If anything we need more shelving, not less. Shelve all the way back to Aegis and them some
  4. Lirro

    Land Allocation (Freebuild vs Charter) [Your View]

    The best part of a new map is that first couple of days where there is about a half a dozen settlements/hubs where there is guaranteed players and RP. After that there is massive proliferation of new places that soon become abandoned. Honestly it would be better if there were no freebuilds or charters, essentially no new settlements after the map is released. Obviously this would never happen because players are so accustomed to the fact that they should be able to build new settlements whenever they feel. Even if a charter system is implemented, by this time next year, we will have EXACTLY the same problem of RP being spread out and too many settlements. Because the guidelines are never strict enough to prevent this from happening. So yeah, because of the culture of Lotc, i reckon that we are doomed to constantly have this problem of there being too many settlements.
  5. Lirro

    THE DUNSHIRE COUP OF 1686: NEW LEADER OF HALFLINGS

    Those elections were rigged anyway. Who cares
  6. Lirro

    Maybe its the lack of sleep.. but.

    If youre feeling sad just keep your head up or something
  7. Lirro

    [Your View] Freebuild

    Already starting to not be able to find rp. Make it so freebuild is less desirable. Such as not being able to lock doors/chests or making them unlockable with a picklock, lock is on a timer. More stronger mobs, PVP default, uncapped raiding etc. At the moment there's really no difference to living in a regioned area then freebuild. Players should be pushed into regioned nations. Really disappointed that I'm already finding dead nation capitals. Some of them are massive, such as Marna, which I really like btw, but I can see them being totally deserted in a months time at this rate, Santegia and a lot of them as well. About time the admin and gm team stand up to the player base and force consolidation. Starting off with 13 nations with cities is utterly ridiculous and with freebuild on top of that, come on.
  8. Lirro

    [✓] Ban appeal

    Minecraft Name (s): Lirro Ban Reason: Running from rp, no cooperation Individuals Involved: Dont remember Event Details: I ran from rp when somebody emoted to kill me. When the gm came I told him to ban me and then I logged out. Why should you be unbanned?: (Why should we unban you?) I knew what I did was wrong at the time. I served the 2 weeks and I want to play on this server again. Additional Screenshots/Videos: (Link, if applicable)
  9. Ban Report/Banning GM (if applicable, please provide a link): I asked to have report made, which the gm agreed to, but changed his mind and I was banned on the spot. Discoliquid Minecraft Name(s) (at the time of your ban): Lirro Rule Broken/Disputed (multikilling, Griefing, Xray, ect. Be specific): The rule broken is "Arguing after a simple ruling" which is a result of the rule being disputed If you run away from combat with little, or no roleplay, those involved are allowed to stop you. This generally means they will knock you down using PvP. Then they must revive you, so that the roleplay may continue. To be clear, killing anyone with no roleplay isn’t permitted. This rule was also brought up You may not abruptly end or void an unfavourable or disadvantageous roleplay situation by mechanically escaping through means such as the soulstone or a warp, without proper roleplay. Character Witnesses (Name(s)): Werbles, Corvoo, Tiliena, Epicsmith Event Details (reason for actions, apology, ect): Yes, I argued. Yes, I didnt like the answer I was given. These are two broken rules. I would not have been driven to this if I was given the opportunity to explain myself over a ban report. From what I have seen, players involved have their argument/discourse. After this the gm gives an impartial verdict. However, the gm took part in the argument/discourse that would otherwise be between players, which ultimately forced me to break the rule. I hate to say it, but the plaintiff and the judge became one in same. The event details are below. My character was tricked into being made a sacrifice of the druids. Once he found this out, he was unwilling and tried to resist and I determined this to be a form of combat. I emoted "makes a dash" and then I ran away. From this point, as mentioned by the rule, the RP became mechanical, and I did not expect them to continue to RP, but to pvp and knock me down. Although the RP was minimal, it did not prevent them from pvping me, which is specified by the rule. I believe that I am justified through this rule that is being disputed, which I believe covers me in this situation. After I had successfully gotten away, since the players didnt knock me down using pvp an argument began. They then got the gm Discoliquid, to teleport me back to the place where the RP had been occurring, but the argument continued. They attempted to justify this through the section "those involved are allowed to stop you" however, since Discoliquid was not initially involved and is a third party to the situation, I believe that it was unfair to have him teleport me back. When I had been teleported back, I was told that I had to finish the RP, which I believe had already been finished as I way able to get away. I argued my point and I was given three options, I had to "finish" the already finished RP, void the RP, or receive a ban report. Firstly, I denied all three because I believed that the rule justified what I did. Since they did not accept my view point I asked for it to be officially resolved over a ban report and they chopped and changed whether they would do this or not. No ban report was posted in the end and I was banned on the spot. The other rule disputed, "You may not abruptly end...", atleast how I read it when I applied was that I cannot solely not soulstone or warp in this situation, which I didnt. Yet because of the tricky wording it was also being held against me. Screenshots/Vids (Link): I did not take any screenshots.
  10. Ban Report/Banning GM (if applicable, please provide a link): Unknown Minecraft Name(s) (at the time of your ban): Lirro Rule Broken/Disputed (multikilling, Griefing, Xray, ect. Be specific): Doesnt say but probably because I found a glitch as a wandering soul and I made a bow and arrow. I started shooting players and animals Character Witnesses (Name(s)): Cant remember Event Details (reason for actions, apology, ect): I found as glitch as a wandering soul and I made a bow and arrow with a work bench and then I started shooting players and animals. I am very sorry for the damage I caused to anyone. I promise I will make a whitelist application immediately and not muck around as a wandering soul. Screenshots/Vids (Link):
×