Alright, I'm going to start off by saying that I cannot prove creation. However, evolution cannot be proved either. Now, for some reasons that I think evolution can't work.
• The sea gets small amounts of salt building up in it each year. If the world was as old as evolution states the oceans would have enough salt in them to walk across.
• The moon moves a small distance from the earth each year. If the world is as old as evolution states then the moon would have been scraping its surface in the beginning, successfully killing any animal that tried to climb out of the sea
• It is basically a mathematical impossibility that even ONE protein would have been successfully created in the primordial soup, let alone enough to create a living organism. If you think about it, it makes more sense that a creator designed life rather than a soup that mathematically shouldn't have made anything was the start.
• Law of Conservation of Matter says matter is never created or destroyed. The Big Bang theory is basically saying there was nothing but perhaps some particles. Somehow two particles in this nothing hit each other, blew up and managed to somehow create everything. In my mind it makes much more sense to believe in a creator than this. I can't prove a creator exists, I can't explain how he came to be or anything else. But, there is just as much in evolution, if not more, that cannot be explained. So, looking at the two, creation just makes more sense.