Jump to content

Thrym

Diamond VIP
  • Posts

    1543
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thrym

  1. Da book is ta be kept organized an' 'old only da forms given. If ye feel da claims made are false send me a message. Da message ye send will be brought up in da Council of Bishops. Apart frum dat, take no public action. We wish ta keep tings civil.
  2. Oi see. Oi apologize fer my outburst Kjell. Oi foind ye a gud dwarf an' agree wit' ye on many tings. 'oweva, oi'll not abandon da name ov Irongut. 'iebe was allowed ta vote as 'e would, we cannae 'old dat against 'im. As fer da Crimsons, 'e 'as relieved dem from 'is service. Oi 'ardly call 'im doin' as we wished ov 'im an' act against ye. 'e is still da king and, in my moind, a gud dwarf. EDIT: As fer Dun. 'e is allowed to write a contention as 'e will. If 'e 'as any support it da Bishops will look at 'is claims an' see if dey are founded. If 'is contention fails an' it is decided dat it was wrong 'e is required ta apologize to ye. Until such time as da verdict is made oi suggest ye keep yer peace. Also, w'en da decision is finalleh made oi recommend ye accept it no matta what.
  3. Un ov yer first statements was dat da book was "Nae approved by da council or our kin". Per'aps I misunderstood but dis seemed ta be callin' da book part of dis "conspiraceh". It may be I 'eard ye wrong but it seemed ye were implicatin' me.
  4. "Oi voted fer da Paragon as well! We both bear da name Irongut yet 'e accuses our clan?"
  5. Maellik speaks on the matter of the book. "Da Book was formed as a way fer da church ta betta record da creation of da Paragons. Up to dis point dere has been no set system. Da church does not need da council ta approve dis! Da title ov Paragon is a religious one and falls under da jurisdiction ov da church alone. A contention 'as been filed by Dun, so be it! Dis 'ardly means da Ironguts plot! Oi'm da Archbishop, Kjell. Oi work wit' da authoriteh ov da Brathmordakin. Oi made dis book so da Dwarven people could say who they wanted to be there Paragons. Da Bishops need to know who the people feel wortheh...an' unworthy. Only den can da Bishops vote on da matta. Tread careful, Paragon. Ye not only slander da Irongut clan 'ew ye wrongly claim conspires but da Archbishop, representatives ov da gods! Bein' Paragon will not save ye from dere wrath if ye continue loike dis."
  6. After Maellik comes to grips with the fact the King wishes to begin studies of the Gods he smiles broadly. "Welcome to da Church uncle."
  7. The Book of the Paragons This is a book in which the Dwarven people may come to elevate those among us, or to lower they who are elevated. This is where those among us who people feel are worthy of the title Paragon are chosen and, where those who bear the title are removed, if necessary. The people elect, the Bishops vote, the choice is made. May this tome bear the names of all they who are considered a Paragon! ((Basically. This thread will serve as a more organized way of making new Paragons as well as removing people from the position of Paragon if needed)) The Elected The names of those Dwarves whom others wish to receive the title of Paragon will be listed here The Contended The names of living Paragons whom the people wish to strip of their title will be listed here Forms Election Form: Use this form if you are wanting to elect someone to be made Paragon OOC Your MC Name: MC Name of the Person being Elected: RP Your RP Name: RP Name of Person being Elected: List of Achievements of the Person: Name of the God they would be Paragon to: Alignment of Person (Chaotic Good, True Neutral, Lawful Evil, etc.): Contention Form Use this Form if you wish to remove the title of Paragon from a living Paragon OOC Your MC Name: MC Name of the Person being Contended: RP Your RP Name: RP Name of Person being Contended: List of Reasons they should be Removed: Support Form Use this form to support an Election/Contention OOC Your MC Name: MC Name of the Person you are supporting the Election/Contention of: RP Your RP Name: RP Name of Person you support the Election/Contention of: Quote the Post you are supporting: Reason you agree this person should be Elected/Removed: Rules for this Thread OOC Rules † You are ONLY allowed to post forms on this thread. No other form of post aside from the verdict of the Bishops is allowed and any other form of post will be deleted by an FM † Support forms are only for SUPPORT. You only use them if you are in favor of an Election/Contention † There will be no flaming. RP Rules † An Election must receive the support of TWO others before it will be voted on by the Bishops † A Contention must receive the support of FOUR others before it will be voted on † If a Contention if voted against by the Bishops (the Person is not removed) then the original person who contended with them must make public apology. (The person who posted the Contention Form) † You may NOT Elect yourself † Dead Paragons may not be contended with All these Rules are subject to change and new rules may be added as needed. You are expected to read them often to stay updated on them.
  8. ((Should we show up as our temp characters even if they aren't the ones in the Legion? At this time, Maellik is still a toddler so...))
  9. ((Well, technically the Dwarves are currently a republic. Democracies have the people directly in control of voting and stuff, republics have representatives like the council we have. Yes, it doesn't matter, yes this is probably pointless in the scheme of things and yes, that little detail was bugging me for some reason and I really have no idea why... :mellow: EDIT: Ugh...reading things wrong again. You said "be democratic" which is correct, not "be a democracy" which I read... I'm gonna call it a night and come back to this exquisite example of dwarven politics in the morning when I can read things correctly.))
  10. Hmm... Well in dat case oi agree dat da group's formation was illegal though I still think their 'onarreh titles, though needin' ta be removed, were dun by legal proccess. 'oweva, da group bein' illegal makes dere titles illegal as well in my mind. Da proccess fer da titles was legal but, due to the illegality of the group, oi now agree wit' yer statement in whole, Kilgrim, not just yer solution. ((O, derp. Sorry, I'm a bit tired and read his statement wrong. For some reason I thought he was saying he was looking in from outside and forgot he was on the council at the moment when I read it.))
  11. Maellik has begun to calm down a bit and turns to Kilgrim. "Kilgrim, would ye please show meh evidence dey were made as a private guard? I 'ad not 'eard ov anytin' ov dis sort before an 'ad believed dem merely to be da army ov da 'uman's in our land."
  12. Maellik returns the scowl. "By what oi read dere was no law broken by dere formation. Oi belive dere formation was done legally, albeit barely. 'oweva, oi still tink dey should be disbanded and absorbed inta da Legion as well as dere 'onarareh toitels taken. Oi stand by ma thoughts dat dere formation was legal. Oi also stand by my thought that the act should still be undone. Ye can tell me ye disagree wit' meh an' explain ta me why but do not insult me nor da king as ye do so. Oi gladly admit wrongs and adjust opinions w'en oi'm shown evidence reasonably but insultin' me an' sayin' oi spit upon da law is not doin' anytin ov da koind. Ye may be old, oi may be young, but oi'm a memba ov dis council just as ye an' oi will not stand fer insults ta be thrown at meh just because ye 'ave a different position! Ye say oi dun respect da law, foine. NOW EXPLAIN DAT! Obviousleh ye read it differentleh but ye've said nothin' ta change ma opinion dat it was lawful, only insulted meh."
  13. Stands up angrily at Kjell's remarks, his left hand clenching reflexively on his axe's handle "Ye dare say oi dun care fer da constitution er da people! YE DARE SAY DAT OI CARE NOT FER DA LAW! Yer a fool Kjell, Paragon er not! If ye pulled yer 'ead outta yer sore arse frum tings in da past long enough ta listen ye'd 'ave 'eard dat oi only said oi found dem ta be lawful. Oi DIDNAE say ta keep dem nor ta keep dere "'onarary dwarven" titles. Oi feckin' agreed dat dey should be absorbed by da legion an' kept an eye on. Now tell me where in da 'ell oi said somefin' dat shows oi care not fer da constition? So I tink dey are lawful, incredible! Doesn' mean oi loik 'avin' dem 'round. Next time, 'fore ye run yer mouth why dun ye make sure ye 'ear all my words correctly. Oi dun take kindly ta da insults ye throw at me, Paragon."
  14. Maellik shrugs. "I see nothing in dese laws dat makes dem unlawful. Da dwarf friend needed could be considered Hiebe and as fer kingdom regulation, dey are regulated by da kingdom. 'iebe is allowed ta give dem a bit ov self control, dat is still regulatin' jus' without 'avin' ta deal with details. Unless ye present more evidence I see no reason fer dem ta be disbanded. By all means merge dem wit' da legion, a single army is best after all, and keep on eye on dem but do not call dem unconstitutional. Dey fit as ta what I can see." EDIT: ((If what I said wasn't clear (I'm a bit tired after all) here is a more distinct summary. Maellik doesn't think them unlawful but is in favour of merging them with the Legion for a more effective army.))
  15. I notice a distinct lack of me :P
  16. ((We will be accepting applications even now. We will just do the actual RP in 2.5))
  17. Then there is Maellik who I have RPed as being a mix of these two types of personality and physiology. With subraces gone does that mean that Maellik likely has some sort of Grandaxe influence on his unknown mother's side?
  18. We've jumped from 201 to 85 on minestatus since I voted less than 10 minutes ago. Keep going!

  19. What's up with the wiki? I can't login.

  20. I don't know if you'll see this but I wanted you to know that you were one of the most helpful GMs to me, literally handling about half of my modreqs at least. I know it doesn't mean much now but I appreciate what you've done for the server and feel you were a good GM and Admin.

  21. ((For the housing question...what if you have no idea at all where in the world you are going to be living in 3.0?))
×
×
  • Create New...