LPT

All I needed was my charm and good looks. ;). Just kidding I actually spent most of my time at either the college, the mall, or in my car.

Downtown Durham region I think it was.

Holy ****. There's so many wanna be bloods here. Wtf is the city?

I'd like to clarify that I didn't say it was a bad thing to be attached, I just said I don't so it. If I get attatched to things I become waaay too passionate. I also am a politician so I've gotta be ready for an assassination so I'm ready to PK every time I log in. 

Nope. Attatchment to characters is something I'll never do. 

Yeah, but not consistently. Plus if you call PvP default to a RPer they typically call you out and get salty, and vice versa. If you just choose by either a vote or roll it's a majority thing so less people are salty or  a neutral party(The roll is true neutral) so you can't be salty because despite it being random it's entirely fair rather than having an admin say "If 1 person says they want to PvP/RP(Depending on the default of the server) you have to listen because default."

Yeah because then both PvPers and RPers have a chance to do the style they enjoy.

Not necessarily true. Groups typically agree on styles. Times where there was a 2 v 2 or a 1 v 1 could require a roll. Some 3 v 1s as well but That'd be rare probably. That leaves 1 v 2s 3 v 1s and in a rare case 2 v 2s.  The roll isn't bad either because it leaves one party satisfied randomly rather than it being forced by a server rule. RP defaulters have a chance to RP pvp defaulters have a chance to pvp.

If the group is considered large (Over 4 I'd say) it'd be stupid to do anything other than pvp. Even during RP default days PvP was default if it was over 4

When is RP oocly chaotic? Do people seriously lack the mental capacity to say ((I want PvP)) or ((I want RP)) I haven't been involved in physical RP conflict in almost half a year so idk maybe its changed, but things were pretty calm OOC from what I can tell. @publius Regardless of whether or not its a group of friendos the majority of people in the situation will enjoy the situation instead of forcing a style because 1 of the 3 people wants PvP or RP. 

Majority default is the best default. No matter what happens the most people in the conflict will be happy. If its 1v1 /roll whoever gets highest picks the default. Wow! A Fair system that leads to the majority in all events happy, why would LoTC ever want to do that?

No thanks...

Canonist and proud. ;)

Dread knights are actually all nobility, or well... knights ;) I need to make lore for Leather Dread peasants.

Thanks for noticing Skippy. I'm sorry that your race never has people playing it that live in the main race's nation. That sounds like a larger inconvenience. 

I lied @Space

lmao Skippy. There's a difference between real life and a premium Minecraft roleplay experience. One is a game 

I legit don't care what you do, but it's aggravating when people criticize people wanting to be nobility. You can try to get people to play peasants if you want more, but criticizing on a status update wont get you anywhere 

I've heard this being said ever since I joined nearly 4 years ago when the Salvus shields were litterally a group of lowly guards.  Has there ever been a point when the grumpy people were happy about human RP? No one is stopping you from being a peasant, but the fact and the matter is politics are fun, so instead of **** talking the people who enjoy politics how about you play a peasant and raise the population of them if you care so much.