Request for Judicial Review on Residence Status

[BenevolentManacles 2232]

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ON RESIDENCE STATUS

 

MEMBERS OF THE ELECTORATE
As Represented by Selm & Associates

 

DESIRES TO SEE THE LEGAL CONTEXT OF THE FOLLOWING REVIEWED

The legality of the vote in the most recent Mayoral election with regard to those who voted without a residential address.

 

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

It is explicitly in the Imperial Charter for the City of Providence that,

 

"That this city government be composed firstly of a lord mayor, who shall be elected from among the residents of this city, and who shall… “

 

It is evidenced by several signed affidavits that many voted in the most recent election by using addresses attached to stalls or mercantile properties.

 

It is also explicitly in the Imperial Charter for the City of Providence that the City Clerk may;

 

"II. Administrate the collection of local taxes or rents, and sale of residences and other properties."

 

From this excerpt we can reasonably construe that both residences and other properties exist in the city, and that one who owns something other than a residence, such as an open stall is not, by definition, a resident. If this were the case, then a foreigner who owned a stall could be considered a resident, which this court should not concede due to the disastrous precedent it would set.

 

It should be the case that the votes registered to non-residential addresses are disqualified, and a recount performed, and that the tally of votes be provided to the Supreme Court for the evidentiary purposes of this case.

 

YOURS HUMBLY,
Edward Selm