THE CROWN v. EVAN KOMNENOS

[Chorale__ 2147]

SUBPOENA - THE CROWN v. EVAN KOMNENOS

4th of The Deep Cold, 1792

THE CROWN,

Represented by OLIVIER A. HALCOURT of THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE,

 

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;

EVAN KOMNENOS

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

202.011 - Where an individual intentionally makes an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another, this shall be assault, a misdemeanor.

 

202.022 - Where an individual intentionally commits upon another an unlawful act of violence which brings about lasting but not permanent injury, incapacitates for any length of time, or utilizes a dangerous weapon, this shall be battery of the second degree, a misdemeanor.

 

Oren Revised Code, CH202 ‘Injury Against the Person’

 

   The defendant (furthermore; he, his, him) had an altercation with the victim (furthermore; she, her) in which he claimed that she was a “woman of the night”. She states that he requested for her to spend the night with him. When she declined his offer, it is said that the defendant got angry and assaulted her. He claims that she was offering to lay with him and that she actually assaulted him. The investigation disproves this. Another witness - Sergeant Markus Ishmael (hereby; Sergeant, he) had treated the victim’s wounds and is inclined to believe the victim’s story (he has an eyewitness). There is evidence that the altercation occurred, and when the Imperial State Army intervened, the defendant tried to pass off the victim’s wounds as self-harm, according to eyewitnesses.

   During the court martial that was assigned, the defendant (furthermore; him) stated that Lieutenant D’Azor (hereby: the Lieutenant) ordered him to arrest the victim. When asked about this, the Lieutenant stated that this was not the case; denying it completely. The result of the Court Martial was a dishonorable discharge due to multiple crimes committed in the past. The Imperial State Army then handed the case over to the Ministry of Justice and investigated by the Office of the State Constabulary. They brought forth a list of possible charges and the Office of State Prosecution formally brought charges towards the defendant.

WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT PARTY OR PARTIES:

 

LEDICORT D’AZOR

FREDERICK TEUFEL

MERLIN FORRESTER

LILLIAN GARNET

CARTER KOMNENOS II

MARKUS ISHMAEL

 

 

ON THE DESIRED DATE OF:

[[PENDING DISCUSSION WITH DEFENDANT]]

 

YOURS HUMBLY,

OLIVIER A. HALCOURT on behalf of THE CROWN,

THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE, PONTIAN PLACE 7, HELENA

[[Chorale_#4767]]

 

[drowknows 696]

A certain Waldenian snorts at the piece of parchment, seeing as he was close with Evan for quite a time, "Ave Julia, it seems to be the Komnenos name is tarnished within utter scandalous affair. First it's that witch, Elene..& now Evan, may God aid them"

[sergisala 3451]

THE CENTRAL CIRCUIT COURT

4^th of Sigismund's End, 1792

 

In accordance with the Legal Procedure Act of 1772, Sir Edward Galbraith, Justice of the Central Circuit Court, does duly assign himself to these proceedings. Accordingly, the assigned Justice shall schedule a preliminary hearing with the Plaintiff and the Defendant in order to review the merits of the case and decide if the matter shall be allowed to proceed to trial.

 

The following parties are to contact Justice Galbraith to arrange a suitable date to present themselves before the Court:

 

- The Plaintiff Olivier A. Halcourt [@DevoutChorale_] on behalf of the Crown.

 

- The Defendant Evan Komnenos [@CasualNuker] and/or her representative. If she cannot afford the employment of a Solicitor of his own, she is to respond as such and be assigned one by the Court.

 

The following parties are required to perform the following actions for the sake of procedure:

 

- The Defendant is to present to the Court a Replying Affidavit at least one saint day before the time of the trial, outlining their responses to the alleged crimes.

 

- Both parties are to present a copy of their Books of Evidence to each other and to the Court at least one saint day before the trial is to occur.

 

Signed,

The Rt. Hon. Justice of the Central Circuit

Sir Edward Galbraith KM J.D. SSE.

[Sergi#5457]

[sergisala 3451]

THE CENTRAL CIRCUIT COURT

10th of Tobias' Bounty, 1793

 

The Central Circuit Court, presided by Sir Edward Galbraith, has today held the preliminary hearing required by the Legal Procedure Act and reminded the Defendant to submit a Replying Affidavit to the Subpoena and reminded both parties of their obligation to exchange the Books of Evidences at least one saint day before the trial. In the aforementioned preliminary hearing, the Court has reviewed the merits of the case and allowed the matter to proceed to trial. The Court has also suggested a date to hold the trial to the Plaintiff and the Defendant, which has been agreed by both of them.

 

 

Signed,

The Rt. Hon. Justice of the Central Circuit

Sir Edward Galbraith KM J.D. SSE.

[sergisala 3451]

THE CENTRAL CIRCUIT COURT

7th of Harren's Folly, 1793

 

The presiding Justice of the Central Circuit Court, Sir Edward Galbraith, has seen fit to recuse himself from this proceeding in order to avoid any possible conflict of interest that he could have with the Defendant, given the fact that the sister of the Defendant attempted to murder him ten years ago.  

 

According to precedent, the Supreme Court shall now assign a new Circuit Justice to preside this proceeding.

 

Signed,

The Rt. Hon. Justice of the Central Circuit

Sir Edward Galbraith KM J.D. SSE.