[✗] [Amendment] More Cursed Children!!!

[Ollie_the_rac00n 9]

 

original:

 

- A connected Naztherak will only conceive a Cursed Child once in their life. This is to prevent the Feat being abused and widespread. This is tracked via the Naztherak's active MA. 

 

new:

 

- A connected Naztherak could conceive a Cursed Child every OOC month. This is to prevent the Feat being abused. This is tracked via the Naztherak's active MA. 

 

Reasoning: 

This allows more chances for people to play a Cursed Child if they want to, while keeping the rarity of the FA. As well as letting Naztherak not have to gate keep making Cursed Children for their friends or other people important to them.

 

[Wolfy-D 466]

do this plz, the feat does pretty much nothing mechanically and before this it would be very gatekept incase there MIGHT be a better person and Naztherak wont be willing to do it

[Metamancy 1759]

i could have sworn it was amended before to make it so that you can only have 1 ever, are we amending it back?

[Anbennar 2350]

2 minutes ago, Metamancy said:

i could have sworn it was amended before to make it so that you can only have 1 ever, are we amending it back?

 

Pinky was Force-DC'd a long while ago.

 

 

My thoughts on CC however, it's a fine line between making it more accessible if someone truly wishes to play as one. And having TOO much Devils running around. I'm not sure how I personally feel with this but if it goes wrong and there's spam it can easily be amended back in and reversed. Maybe once every 2 months per Warlock.

[Zonty 994]

You will not bait me into doing romance roleplay

[King_Kunuk 3022]

Heh, now I can justify finding a mommy goth Zar'Akal GF. Thanks bud.

[_AzureLexi 766]

@King_KunukSorry, you need an MArt that lets you romance on a Zar'akal 

[Tentoa 3160]

call me the fun police but I'd rather Naz be redlined like necromancers into never feeling love again than deal with romance RPing devil worshippers cutting in the basement and having tiefling babies. There's mechanically nothing wrong with this - but I hate it. 

[King_Kunuk 3022]

9 minutes ago, Tentoa said:

call me the fun police but I'd rather Naz be redlined like necromancers into never feeling love again than deal with romance RPing devil worshippers cutting in the basement and having tiefling babies. There's mechanically nothing wrong with this - but I hate it. 

I was told they tried this but it got shut down.

[PrimnyaQuorum 3999]

I think we're so deep in this puritan rabitthole we forgot the original reason naz always had CC kids was because naz would give themselves the CC bane for a effectively free minor boon bc none of them were really romance RPing or having kids anyway, and ST decided this was something that needed fixing [not vhiiit or inferi or akal btw this pre-dates all those rewrites] 

 

At the end of the day, the core "issue" is that LT don't like it when naz can get a boon without worrying about the bane bc 90% of naz do not bother with family RP and most of you are hyperfocused on the maybe 3-5 people in one group who did it as a consequence of this "nerf" to prevent boonmaxxing. the original amendment created a solution to a non-existance issue [the only good minor boon is levitation be so fr]

[Pallodium 3775]

This lore has been denied. 

 

This was changed in the recent past from what you are suggesting to what currently is present. At the current moment, we are not interested in reverting said change; the conversion ritual always exists without this cap.