Jump to content

Petition To The Council

 Share


Recommended Posts

((I told him to use ooc parenthesis... How is that wrong? He said "come to the council RPly" which indicates ooc talk.))

He means the "I know that Nashtoff is upset with me..." post I believe. (())

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tis a sad day when a man of the people is taken out of power in the military by nobles. Ye have built up the rangers from what I've heard. I though ye revolutionaries were against exactly what ye are doing to Hawk here. He should have been able to defend himself and of been told of his charges. Ye have my support Hawk. Also do not say ye are too new to be corrupt, that is like saying ye are already corrupt. Ye coucil has not shown much proof other then he said she said.

((Please people learn how to use (()) and periods, I am not perfect but we can all use some work.))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like to point out that as seneschal I AM entitled to vote and i was not even consulted, 7-0? pfft as if?

((annoyed Khronos=issues))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hawk?

I support you. You should be re-instated. I will also ask Tyraelius to voice his opinion.

((Remember that conversation we had about a certain someone being blackmailed?))

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rarely deal with the rangers anymore after retiring, but in this instance, I feel that Hawk needs to be given a fair trial, as I am unaware of his wrongdoings.

As Zibaen said, everybody has the right to defend themselves. If the council still voted Hawk out, thats alright, as long as he has presented his case to everybody. Right now we dont know what Hawk has supposedly did wrong.

Just allow Hawk Whitestorm a hearing. I do not like seeing the injustice done upon him in this manner of uncertainty and rigged voting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unacceptable.

Hawk has done so much for Oren and even more for Renatus, then he is dismissed from both his positions without clear reasoning or a fair chance to defend himself. I personally have seen disarray and lack of communication from the council and question their ability if these are the kind of informative decisions we can expect from them. How can we trust this council is properly unified and organised when not all of them are voting on critical issues?

I ask that you all come to an agreement on solid, unbiased reasoning for Hawk's removal from the Rangers or reinstate him immediately. This request is nothing other than fair and just.

With the amount of support Hawk has, don't you wonder if you are making the right decision?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...