Jump to content

ReveredOwl

Member
  • Posts

    908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ReveredOwl

  1. In preparation Hubert scopes out both the palace and cathedral for any spot a goblin assassin may perch themselves on.
  2. The admins have been suspiciously silent recently, not seen telanir Yet!

  3. the live map shouldn't be used for testing a new plugin that was created for a new map release, it should have already been completed and tested
  4. Why was the plugin not ready for release, you say it was because of the temp map but you're saying those three days were to complete vortex and if thats the case how did he expect any testing to happen of his 'complete' vortex plugin other than on the live new map?
  5. Are there already bandits? Vortex is difficult enough to get a grasp of so I hope they have the decency to give new players a reprieve 

  6. I thought a guide was already being made?
  7. Ah you're reading replies, when can we expect an official response to the community?
  8. Fast travel is back with delays like 'this cart leaves in 5 minutes.'
  9. @Hiebe why was this information only made public day before map release because from what I get from this is that you're gonna ram this down our throats without any regard for the communities input at all, i would like to know if you wanted the community input on this new system why only release this a day before map release.
  10. All this stuff about investing and watching the economy, I hate to remind you that most people come here to take a break from irl or just to have fun, nobody wants to have to keep a constant eye on the economy nor do most even want to understand how economies work. Do we all now need to get economic degrees to successfully play this server now?
  11. Damn I must have missed the part when joining the server that says I will need a degree in economics to play the server properly
  12. Hahaha as if vortex didn't **** things up enough already
  13. Yes, I do not think people who tested the alpha or are simply whiteknighting for nick calling people 'brainlets' for finding it confusing or having a complaint helps anybody.
  14. imagine being muted for voicing your concerns about a plugin nobody asked for or was consulted with

  15. unlock the feedback thread!

  16. agree 100% with flemish but I don't see the staff changing this at all and if they do then it will mysteriously delay 8.0 for a number of weeks for 'technical issues' which we all know would be non-existent and simply serve as a punishment for not liking something they added to the server without any input from the community.
  17. This whole crafting systems appears to not be very new-player friendly, its very confusing, it took a while for us to just figure out copper, imagine how long it will take for new players to understand it when everything is released.
  18. if there is its not been well advertised, I've seen no threads or anything about it
  19. Still, it would've made a lot more sense to have the inferi event carry on and be the reason for us leaving instead of coming up with a reason after the fact
  20. I have a question, has an end of world event been planned, like a reason we decide to suddenly relocate via the sea and if so is there a time that this event will happen? @CommissarVoop
  21. Never heard of those three places
  22. Delusional, simply delusional.
  23. JUSTITIA IN PACE JUSTICE IN PEACE 1st of Sigismund’s End, 1789 1st of Joma and Umund, 342 Dear Lauritz, I am glad to hear that an old admirer of my work still holds office, this time in the Haenseti courts ensuring that justice prevails and criminals are brought to justice. Naturally I understand it is your duty to bring those to court who you believe have broken the law and I understand your hand was forced in this. I bare you no ill-will and hope that perhaps after this we might still be friends. I will refute the crimes to which you have stated in your summons piece by piece, I understand that I may still be brought to court regardless but I wish to make my position known to the public regarding this. I do not believe that anything written in the forty one theses constitutes heresy or blasphemy nor does it contravene the teachings of the church. The first change that you have levelled against me is going against church teachings and doctrines in regard to my writings relating to non-human descendants entering the skies. I wrote that only humans can enter the seven skies due to a misunderstanding of parts of the scripture. I misunderstood and believed that Horen and Julia were the first man and woman, this was something that was taught to me at a very early age: that they were the first coupling. Once I realised my mistake I retracted my writings in a reply to a letter addressed to me, naturally I will write a letter to address very soon to clear this up. The second charge that has been levelled against me is slander of the Holy Canonist Church, one must understand that the Holy Canonist Church is an institution created by GOD, led by fickle mortal men. I did not directly accuse the Pontiff of blasphemy merely that to change accepted precedent and doctrine that had been established for centuries would constitute blasphemy. An insult to a mortal man is not an insult to our institution and values. As I have stated above this was due to a misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the scrolls and proves that all men are capable of mistakes and misinterpretation and I retracted this as soon as I realised my mistake, unlike some I could mention. The forth charge you have levelled against me is that I have conducted heresy. The topic of non-humans ascending to the seven skies has been rather a controversial one and I am always open to discussion on this particular subject, however to push the assertion that it is heresy is simply wrong for High Pontiff Daniel III once declared that it was impossible for non-humans to enter the seven skies and based off the Pontiffs statements regarding infallibility, no pontiff can be fallible and what Daniel III said was truth, lest we cast the whole notion of infallibility to the wind, which this charge would do. It is also true that catechisms often change and are fallible so it is wholly unreliable to use this as evidence in court. The fifth charge that you have levelled against me that I am going against church teachings where I state that the church has been pulled away from its original purpose. I do wholly believe this to be true. It is true that the church as an institution can not be corrupt for its purpose is clear for all, yet men can be corrupt and misuse the church for their own gains. I ask you dear Lauritz, when was the last time you saw mass being performed in the city of Reza, a very long time I bet and this simply proves that the church is not what it once was, this is due to mortal men not the institution itself. You have accused me of trying to turn the faithful against the accepted hierarchy of the church and I refute this. I have never once called for schism, anti-pontificates or for the pontiff to be overthrown, only requesting that he resign if he is unable to fix the wrongs that have been done. I urged the faithful to join me in requesting the Pontiff to resign and requesting a pontiff to resign is not going against the church hierarchy nor is it blasphemy or heretical it is a simple request. I do understand the sentence provided can confuse people and that is something I regret, I often fail to pick up these types of errors when proof-reading my missives and for that I can only apologise but I do not mean that the public will be condemned if they did not join me in urging James to resign. I meant that if James is unable to recognise the error of his ways and fix the wrongs done to his church he could be condemned for it, as I believe it to be a grave sin to allow our church to fall into such a disillusioned way. To conclude, I am happy to see that religion has made its way into the Haensetic laws, better religious laws than the Holy Orenian Empire at that. However I refute all allegations made against me, I hold no ill-will towards you Lauritz and hope that this summons might be retracted for I have disproved the allegations however I understand if you wish to take this to court and look forward to seeing you there. With kind regards, Boniface.
  24. What would have happened to the kha if it wasn't leaked, removed without ever being contacted.
×
×
  • Create New...