Sky

I support this, however I would also like to see it being something that clashes with soul trees and having to choose one or the other, but that's another topic.

Why not unattune the druid? They can't be a Thulean if they aren't a druid.

Matt writes well when he puts his mind to it.

Alright, I see why you made this amendment.

And yet, you are trying to make a veiled attempt at blocking individuals who have been gaining it through roleplay, masquerading it as 'not wanting it to become a pass-around magic', when everyone knows learning blood magic is one of the hardest magics in the entire server to get your hands on, so the very concept of it being that is laughable at best.

It wasn't removed due to IC drama, a rewrite has been in the works for the past several months and the majority of the soul tree community agreed with the premise of removing the PK clause, even members of the LT believed it to be a nuisance and adds no roleplay opportunities if removed. Thus it was decided to make them return to their prior form, personally I was considering having a permanent disconnection to nature, however I have already had complaints about having to wait three months of disconnected.

It also states in there that it's a voidal art, not a dark magic, but here it states it is done through life-force and not the void. Either way, I believe that it should be amended that the deity isn't fooled by the connection as it really isn't explained that well and I highly doubt that it would work. Personal belief, if a soul is protected then a soul is protected, I don't believe that there should be a pseudo-excuse for the soul to be vulnerable in any sort of state. Again, personal belief.

You explained Ascended, a single holy group. Why would the Aspects allow this to go through on their druids, when shades are denied? Why would Xan allow this to go through on their paladins, when they cannot be turned to dread knights? Why would Tahariae allow this to go through on their clerics, when they are unable to become ferals? The second part of the questions don't have to be answered, but explain why the aformentioned trio are able to be cursed, when Ascended are the only group which cannot be.

Will this amendment explain as to how soul puppeteers are able to curse people whom's souls should be protected? https://www.lordofthecraft.net/forums/topic/135576-the-effects-of-disconnection/; The second paragraph of that lore states that upon being connected to a deity, that your soul is preserved and certain things, such as shades, cannot get into the soul as it is protected. What is the reasoning as to how this magic bypasses that?

Soul Tree Amendment Unattunement The act of unattuning a soul tree has but a singular difference between itself and the unattuning of a regular druid. That being, on top of being able to be unattuned through your person (in this case the husk), they are able to also be unattuned through their tree. There still needs to be three present, one who knows how to unattune and two who know how to attune, as well as the person to either be physically in front of the three (if doing it via husk) or to be online and being told through messages that their tree is being tampered with, in an attempt to be unattuned (if doing it via tree). -Three druids required to perform an unattunement, one who can unattune and two who can attune. -If being unattuned via the husk, the druid being unattuned must be there physically for the act to happen. -If being unattuned via the tree, the druid must be online and informed that their tree is currently being attempted to remove the attunement. -Cannot be unattuned via the sapling if the tree is currently destroyed, must be through the tree or husk. -If the player (in either scenario) decides to log off (without probable cause) then the unattunement may continue without their presence. After Effects The after effects of a soul tree being unattuned has not been widely known, not until the unattunement of a previous druid who had returned to their previous life, as prior it was believed the user would not ever return. A soul tree user who is unattuned would have their husk die off, the tree slowly begin to wilt, and with it their soul would return to the soul stream, and like everyone else who dies, return to the land of the living. However, they look exactly how they did before taking on the gift and return to the age of which they were when taking on the ritual. With the return of their mortal flesh body, they are also unable to be reattuned into nature for a lengthy amount of time, it being three (3) elven months before any attempted reattunement would be able to work and like all reattunements, requires three individuals who all know how to unattune to reattune the individual. -The husk disintegrates into a natural substance, as if destroyed (IE. soil, flowers, insects, etc). -The tree slowly begins to wilt before dying completely, the tree itself cannot be saved. However branches of it can be, thus preserving part of the tree but not it as a whole, and the tree will be a regular variant of the species harvested from. -The unattuned individual returns to life at the cloud temple (spawn). -Their body is reverted to how it was prior to the soul tree ritual (age, markings, clothing, etc). -The individual is unable to become reattuned to nature within three months of being unattuned. -The reattunement requires three druids who all know how to unattune to reattune the individual.

Whether you disagree or not, it still isn't a prerequisite. If the lore is well written and well recieved, then it will be looked at regardless of whether or not the person who submitted it has an active persona of that race or group. If it doesn't suit the lore of the race, then point out that it doesn't suit the lore. I didn't say it wasn't a factor, I said it wasn't a prerequisite. Most lore is implimented without any given 'RP sense', because it's mostly forcefully put in through some sort of event or pretending it always existed. If the community of the group isn't open for it, then point out reasons why it shouldn't, state that it doesn't fit with the lore of the race or the culture of the group, instead of stating it's because they aren't part of the group. If you feel so strongly that you need to play the race before you can create lore for it, then propose it in feedback, instead of utilizing it as a reason to deminish someone's efforts.

While I believe that this lore doesn't add anything that should allow it to be accepted (as others stated) but playing a [insert race] isn't a prerquisite to being able to write lore that involves said race.

I am actually quite shocked and disapointed that I need to be posting this sort of thing on anyone's application, especially one claiming to be an adult as you have, however it seems that it must be done. Applying as a character that is a straight and clear example of a Nazi is both not allowed, and not appropriate, this is clear with the name you have given and your very not subtle way of changing the word 'Jew' to 'High-Elf'. Normally this would be met with a harsh rebuttel, perhaps even a ban, however I write this in hopes that it was merely meant to make some friends laugh (albiet friends who are likely very immature, as the joke isn't even entertaining or funny), as such I won't be pushing for a punishment. Though I won't be lennient if I happen across similar actions by you in the future. Please grow up. Good luck with your future application, if you need any help feel free to contact an Application Team member, and have a good day.

Changed Status to Denied

Hey mate, unfortunately you have failed to fill out what your age is, and guest applications are not able to edit their application. Could you please fill out a new application with the age included? Thank you.

Adding to this if you don't mind Will, is that Druid's don't have magic 'disconnection visions' like other deity magics. You can be as evil as you want, and the aspects don't give a **** in essence.

Alright, though I've also come to the realization that druid lore is over saturated in my opinion, but I won't fight against this lore piece. Simply an observation I have made.

Everything is good minus the fourth aspect, one aspect of shadows and another aspect that's unknown? No thank you. Unless you make it so that Nemiisae was never actually an aspect and this one was the real third.

Character Description: Wood elf with rustic red hair, red eyes with a green glow and gentle brown skin. The skin has no scarring and his hair is held in a similiar fashion to here. Normal wood elven ears, not as long as high elves but longer and pointed more than a human. Character Sheet: Could you possibly explain what you mean by this? Skin Screenshot: https://i.gyazo.com/64926bda0bdbda2b99f898b8ebd09455.png https://i.gyazo.com/7059aca7415d23e1a051d8fa74d77674.png (Just ignore the armour and have the skin ending) Extra Shading: Yes please Reference(s): https://i.imgur.com/FX6BBbZ.png (Except more red like the skin) - Character Description: Elf with brown to black hair, one eye a piercing blue the other a milky white as a scar runs down the her face, and her skin being soft, and pale. Normal elven ears. Character Sheet: Again, not sure what is meant by this. Skin Screenshot: https://i.gyazo.com/d42d6768365fdf3f326bc5579ce50baa.png https://i.gyazo.com/be1e54387e71897325c08fa086261927.png (Just ignore the armour and have the skin ending) Extra Shading: Yes please Reference(s): https://i.imgur.com/Y9wUtMB.png

No point in a seperate lore piece, half-breeds always get the negative of both (yes with same sub-race) so it would still end up idiotic. Also, half-olog raises the question of consent and the dreaded 'R' word! They are too stupid to understand the concept, so are you pseudo-molesting these poor ologs? Poor guys...

Kharajyr can only bed kharajyr, or you'll get banned. Hou-zi can only bed hou-zi, or you'll get banned. Descendants can only bed descendants, or you'll get banned. Chimera should not be allowed to bed descendants, kharajyr, or hou-zi. Stating they can't have children, implies they can ****, and your reasoning of 'but they have their bits and pieces' doesn't hold water because so do animals, and bestiality is not allowed on any forms what so ever. Also, druidism with chimera make no sense since it's a very unnatural thing that goes against animals will, no animal would want this at all and the aspects would not be happy.

That was in the red-lines in the past to stop people from making catgirls and what not, please re-add.