The more I browse the forums and consider the issue,
the more I understand and support the staff decisions.
I still appreciate the sentiments expressed by the community, but feel that there is still merit to be acknowledged in the decisions. As well as this, I can appreciate that it was expressly noted that this was a 'test'. Thus, we don't need to overreact about the issue; we can make the most of it, and, as was intended, observe the results.
Without elitist measures such as Accumulative Reputation, we're all brought to an equal level, wherein all posts are considered with the same respect.
It's been noted that it served no purpose, and, therefore, should be left as it was. That's strange logic.
Anyway, the only purpose it did ever serve was to feed egos and instill an unwarranted sense of authority. A player of a few months can have just as much to say, of equal value, to one who has been around long enough to cultivate a rep of x-hundred. I, personally, find myself considering more posts seriously, keeping Rep out of the equation. I feel that the absence of Rep allows for more voices to be heard, and for insightful, valuable discussion to be given a platform.
As noted by KarmaDelta, restricting those [+1]s to individual posts allows for community opinion to be conveyed clearer; [+1]s are no longer handed out for the sake of the poster's reputation, but as the mere "Aye" that they should be. [-1]s would work with the current system, but are unnecessary and easily abused.
The decision regarding Status Updates was interesting, and worth testing; however, based upon results, I think we've learned that this decision needs to be revised. A casual chat platform is a near-essential thing for such a tight-knit community. However, perhaps we can hold onto both a dedicated Staff 'Quick News' box, and a casual conversational box. Such would nurture both staff-player connection, keep players informed and uplifted, and, simultaneously, provide a visible sense of life and dynamism.
Negative expression in Status Updates is a matter for firm, consistent moderation.
As/if we move into a new system of moderation and such, players and staff need to adapt. Mutual respect and empathy is key. Firm messages need to be made in regards to 'shitposting' and other such problems. With each issue, try as much as possible to explain.
The community's reaction has been ridiculous and destructive, though somewhat understandable. All of those so quick to complain - you have that right, but, for the sake of the community you so violently claim to represent so definitively, please be sensible. There are fair points to be found, though it's hard to find and/or appreciate something that's dressed up so offensively.
In the end, I can appreciate rationale on both sides, but feel that, particularly in the case of Reputation, the cons heavily outweigh any pros.
I dunno; just my thoughts.
Staff; thanks for your work towards a more efficient, constructive environment. Keep up the good work.