Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 174 views
-
-
- 2 replies
- 216 views
-
- 2 replies
- 144 views
-
- 2 replies
- 236 views
-
- 2 replies
- 297 views
-
- 2 replies
- 196 views
-
- 2 replies
- 192 views
-
- 2 replies
- 262 views
-
- 2 replies
- 357 views
-
- 2 replies
- 231 views
-
- 2 replies
- 129 views
-
- 2 replies
- 186 views
-
- 2 replies
- 229 views
-
- 2 replies
- 384 views
-
- 2 replies
- 180 views
-
- 2 replies
- 184 views
-
- 2 replies
- 309 views
-
- 2 replies
- 297 views
-
- 2 replies
- 223 views
-
- 2 replies
- 287 views
-
- 2 replies
- 288 views
-
- 2 replies
- 214 views
-
- 2 replies
- 170 views
-
- 2 replies
- 303 views
-
- 2 replies
- 325 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
-
-
-
-
-
The roleplayer's alternative to Stendhal. You can find it live within the Glade-Core.
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
