Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 185 views
-
-
- 2 replies
- 264 views
-
- 2 replies
- 119 views
-
- 2 replies
- 170 views
-
- 2 replies
- 163 views
-
- 2 replies
- 146 views
-
- 2 replies
- 148 views
-
- 2 replies
- 140 views
-
- 2 replies
- 133 views
-
- 2 replies
- 107 views
-
- 2 replies
- 132 views
-
- 2 replies
- 171 views
-
- 2 replies
- 128 views
-
- 2 replies
- 147 views
-
- 2 replies
- 167 views
-
- 2 replies
- 271 views
-
- 2 replies
- 201 views
-
- 2 replies
- 215 views
-
- 2 replies
- 220 views
-
- 2 replies
- 238 views
-
- 2 replies
- 397 views
-
- 2 replies
- 283 views
-
- 2 replies
- 224 views
-
- 2 replies
- 264 views
-
- 2 replies
- 237 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
