Minor Rule Change: PK Loopholes

[Song Druid 1486]

^ ^ As you said they overcome it through RP, implying they have a lore friendly reason to be far past the age they are supposed to?

 

 

If they didn't they should klll off their characters.  Or we as a server need to do a serious look at the Iblees curse because we can't have curses we don't enforce.

[Thatpyrodude 2008]

good rule change

[Eranikus 348]

On 1/16/2016 at 8:42 PM, Fishy said:

Ew no, that would just lead to fewer nonhuman PKs, who already do it sparingly, since they're already 'immortal' and never actually require an heir. It would just serve to punish human players who have no one else lined up to play a son or such. Neither is it that far-fetched for one's heir to turnout similar to oneself if they're raised by their predecessor, though people should make be making variances between those characters of their own volition, not by staff enforcement.

It would also serve to encourage more Aegis tier race-mixing, done solely to avoid curses rather than for any deeper RP.

From what I understand that doesn't work. No matter how much elf blood you got, the human curse of mortality is still there.

 

And that's why you don't mix mustard and custard!

[Achilles 892]

To be honest, I enjoyed watching a man swallow a brick to get out of a jail cell.... this just removes that fun.

0/10 Staff Decision!

[Aesopian 1640]

This isn't for making you PK, it's for just making it so IF you PK, you can't un-PK.

[mitto 2312]

Moved to The Great Library. It shall be sorted into the appropriate category shortly.

 

If you feel this is a mistake, please contact myself or any FM and we'll restore it.