CASE OF AL-ABAASI v. ILLOAI

[frill 2277]

CASE OF AL-ABAASI v. ILLOAI

 

 

GOLDEN COURT OF VES

10th of Snow's Maiden, 1719.

 

 

PROCEDURE

 

 

1. Plaintiff Fareed AL-ABAASI, a citizen of the Golden City of Ves, filed claim. Defendant Arthur ILLOAI, as represented by Chadwick MORRIS, is of no fixed abode.
2. The plaintiff alleged in particular the violation of Article 3 § 1.2 of the Code of Laws of the Holy Orenian Empire.

 

 

 

THE CLAIM

 

 

 

FAREED AL-ABAASI ACCUSED ILLOAI OF MISDEMEANOUR THEFT OF;

 

SIXTY-FOUR [64] COD,

EIGHT [8] SALMON,

ONE-HUNDRED-AND-FIFTY [150] MINAS,

ONE [1] BLADE

ONE [1] SUIT OF ARMOR.

 

 

 

THE FACTS

 

1. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

 

 

 

When travelling the King's Road nearing the Golden City of Ves, a herd of bandits attempted to rob AL-ABAASI under duress of immediate threat to life, as denoted by their brandishing of swords. The group of bandits included the defendant, who himself brandished a weapon during the commission of the crime.

 

 

 

2. FACTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS.

 

 

 

Defendant ILLOAI pled NOT GUILTY to the charge of misdemeanour theft.

 

Defendant ILLOAI pled GUILTY to the charge of infraction theft.

 

Defendant ILLOAI admitted under oath of threat of violence during the commission of the theft.

 

Defendant ILLOAI did not dispute the value of the property being stolen as over 150 minas.

 

Plaintiff AL-ABAASI did not dispute the value of the property being stolen as over 150 minas.

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF THE COURT

 

 

The court concludes that Defendant ILLOAI did intentionally deprive Plaintiff AL-ABAASI of his moveable property through threat of violence, and this property totals greater than one hundred fifty minas.

The court concludes that Defendant ILLOAI admitted to such as under oath.

 

The court concludes that this admittance under oath of commission of a crime is sufficient to conclude a violation of a crime.

 

The court concludes that admission to commission of a crime under oath within a court of law does not necessitate a re-trial due to inaccurate allegations of the plaintiff.

 

The court therefore sees Defendant ILLOAI as guilty of Article 3 § 3.2 of the Code of Laws of the Holy Orenian Empire.

 

 

FOR THIS REASON, THE COURT RULED

 

 

The Defendant ILLOAI was so sentenced to the removal of three fingers to the third-knuckle of his sword-wielding hand.

The Defendant ILLOAI had thus removed three finger to the third-knuckle of both hands, as the defendant so claimed ambidextry of his sword-wielding hand.

 

 

Eidr Haraqqa, Lesser Magistrate.

 

 

__

[Hastur 72]

Abdul appreciates the six new fingers.

[stickycrud 19]

Dresden scrubs Arthur’s blood from his hands in a washbowl, drying them shortly after. A light red tint would remain on them for a while, though he didn’t mind much.