Jump to content

Subpoena for SARKOZIC VS VIDENZ-NOVELLEN


frill

Recommended Posts

Subpoena for;

 

SARKOZIC VS VIDENZ-NOVELLEN

 

12th Godfrey’s Triumph, 1759.


THE PLAINTIFF, Peter de Sarkozy,
REPRESENTED BY Sir Veikko Harjalainen, Esq.

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;
 
Joseph Clement Videnz-Novellen

 
ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW;

 

Lex Harracene Table IV §1 “On Defining Obligation,” Art. 2.
Lex Harracene Table V §1 “On Consent,” Arts. 2, 5.
Lex Harracene Table V §3 “On Interpretation,” Arts. 1.
Lex Harracene Table V §4  “On Rescission and Nullity,” Arts. 1, 3, 8.

 

The plaintiff requests a peremptory disqualification of John d’Arkent as potential presiding judge due to having financial interests in the outcome of the case as party to a subsidiary contract of the one contested.


FACTS

 

By way of a loan contract, 14 000 minae was transferred to the imperial treasury in name of Joseph Clement Videnz-Novellen. This was a verbal contract with financial statements within the treasury ledger showing this payment as “-14,000 for Helena Extravagance [CONFIRMED]”.

 

The loan has not been paid in three years since reaching maturity.

 

The plaintiffs request settlement of the debt.

 

COMPLAINTS

 

Through the lack of payment of the debt on the loan reaching maturity, this is a breach of contract under imperial law.

 


RELIEF REQUESTED ON CAUSES OF ACTION ALLEGED AGAINST DEFENDANTS

 

WHEREFORE plaintiff respectfully requests repayment of the debt in excess of 14 000 minae and further attorney fees, costs, and interest of 5% of the original loan amount and for such other and further relief that the Court deems just and proper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir Fiske Vanir pens a letter to Peter de Sarkozy.

“Mister Sarkozy, I will be able to take this case. I would like a full list of your witnesses and evidence to be sent to me within the saint’s week so that we may set a date for trial.”

 

((discord: Connor#0320))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plaintiff withdraws suit prior to initial hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...