Jump to content

Summons: Styrne v. Hayman


yopplwasupxxx

Recommended Posts

SUMMONS

Styrne v. Hayman

 

JULIA STYRNE

Represented by LEONARD VAN HALEN MHC

 

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;

 

CONRAD ‘CONWAY’ HAYMAN

 

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

Julia Styrne, henceforth referred to as Styrne, rents an apartment on 8 Basrid Boulevard in Helena that is owned by an individual known as Conrad ‘Conway’ Hayman, henceforth referred to as Hayman. For the last three years, Hayman has not been present at the property and not fulfilling duties to maintain the property, despite Styrne paying all rent on time and in full. Because Hayman has abandoned the property and not fulfilled the duties as landowner, it is the belief of Styrne that she is entitled to the 8 Basrid Boulevard property.

 

The Party of Julia Styrne, as represented by Leonard van Halen, seeks the aforementioned actions performed based on the following act(s), edict(s), order(s), and legislation,

 

I - A POSSESSOR IS DEPRIVED HIS RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP IF THEY ABANDON THE POSSESSION

 

According to ORC 303.074, “A possessor may lose a thing, A) By Abandonment…”. Because Hayman has abandoned the property for over three years and not maintained it in any form, his rights as owner are null and void.

 

II - OWNERSHIP IS ACQUIRED THROUGH OCCUPANCY

 

According to ORC 303.022, “Ownership is acquired through occupancy…”. Because Styrne is the current occupant of the property, ownership is rightful hers if there is no current owner.

 

The Party of Julia Styrne, as represented by Leonard van Halen, seeks for the property of 8 Basrid Boulevard to be transferred to the Party of Julia Styrne as per her rights as occupant.

 

ON THE DESIRED DATE OF:

((To be discussed OOCly))


 

YOURS HUMBLY,

LEONARD VAN HALEN MHC

6 Helvets, Owynsburg, Kaedrin, Oren

[[yoppl the tarchar#5195]]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edward Selm points a frail finger at Skingaard, his friend and colleague, “This’s the sort of **** that makes money, hit ‘em hard.”

 

The sickly lawyer launches into a coughing fit before taking a sip of his whiskey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGAL PROCEDURE ACT, 1772,

 

Central Circuit Court Justice Albert de Falstaff, SSE, does duly assign himself to these proceedings. Accordingly, the following parties are to contact Mr. Albert de Falstaff, SSE, to arrange a suitable date to present themselves before the court;

 

Ms. Julia Styrne and/or her representative, Leonard van Halen MHC. [@yopplwasupxxx]

 

Mr. Conrad Hayman and his designated representative. If he cannot afford the employment of a solicitor of his own, he is to respond as such and be assigned one by the Court.  

 

Furthermore, Mr. Conrad Hayman, herein the Defendant, is to present to the Court within the context of these Summons a Replying Affadavit at least One [1] Saint’s Day before the time of the trial, outlining their responses to the alleged Abandonment.

Both parties, as per the Legal Procedure Act, shall furthermore be reminded that Books of Evidence are to be exchanged One [1] Saint’s Day before the trial is to occur.

 

If the trial does not begin within one [1] year per annum of the servicing of this summons, dated 12 Harren’s Folly 1787, due to the unresponsiveness or uncooperative nature otherwise of one party, the offending party will be ordered to excuse themselves on the presiding Justice’s judgement.

 

Cordially,

Albert de Falstaff, SSE

 


 

[Please add bickando#5883 on discord to arrange a time and day.]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...