[✗] [Amendment] Naz 2-Time DC (PK Edition)

[Rig 17591]

A few things.

1.) The mass disconnection war was occurring prior to the change, not as a consequence of it. So, you're wrong there. I had to redisconnect several people despite the amendment change.
2.) There was grievous abuse within the enemy coven I disconnected. It was insane enough to merit multiple reports on the responsible players, resulting in three Naztherak blacklists on the enemy side respectively, and the elevation of a report to Admin level resulting in the ban of a long-time degenerate, one you and others are familiar with. 
3.) Naztherak is plenty active from the Inferis/Zar'akal perspective. Naztherak exist in hiding outside of the primary cults (Black Church & Lichtenwald). I had multiple people trying to disconnect me for months and survived without logging off for 30 days and waiting for my opposition to disappear. Because I'm not an invertebrate and neither are my players. 

This "slack" is being framed as a positive thing. Slack by definition is almost always bad. I'm going to refrain from personal attacks here, but if you want to get into some verbal fisticuffs I can go dig up the extensive Discord logs and situations detailing the abuse of the magic by people you know, and all relevant dramas pertaining to it at the player level. The court of public opinion will not be on their side after they see the sheer amount of inappropriate conduct present in those logs, frankly. 

[KeiaTypeBeat 3285]

2 minutes ago, Rig said:

The Game 

 

Go home old man 

[MysticalWeasel 915]

Mhm yes... 

[Digit___ 1226]

I don’t even have a Naz and I don’t think this is fair for the community.
As some have already pointed out, Forced PK on the second disconnection will cause more issues than it would solve. The disconnection ritual already doesn’t need OOC consent to be performed on someone (it’s in the redlines). You might see more, mostly bad faith, PKs as a result of this amendment passing.
Storywise, if the Rokul despises weakness, why would a Naz coven bring a weakling back into their fold? There’s a reason it’s redlined to be a permanent disconnection and the consequences are what they are (lost magic slots, brand can’t be purge, etc.). 
 

-1

[PrimnyaQuorum 4008]

3 hours ago, Digit___ said:

I don’t even have a Naz and I don’t think this is fair for the community.
As some have already pointed out, Forced PK on the second disconnection will cause more issues than it would solve. The disconnection ritual already doesn’t need OOC consent to be performed on someone (it’s in the redlines). You might see more, mostly bad faith, PKs as a result of this amendment passing.
Storywise, if the Rokul despises weakness, why would a Naz coven bring a weakling back into their fold? There’s a reason it’s redlined to be a permanent disconnection and the consequences are what they are (lost magic slots, brand can’t be purge, etc.). 
 

-1

 The Rokul actually don’t care either way - they want the soul and they get it the moment you connect to material. Everything else is just OOCism to make 1-DC work

[Pallodium 3779]

This lore has been denied. You will be sent a forum PM regarding the reasons for denial within the next 24 hours.