Jump to content

ski_king3

Banned
  • Posts

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Status Replies posted by ski_king3

  1. Anyone remember that really remote steampunk island in 3.0?

  2. Twitter is a gift from god.

    1. ski_king3

      ski_king3

      I agree right now we are truly in the golden age of twitter

    2. (See 1 other reply to this status update)

  3. we're 3 months from 2018 and dpm is still not banned. can this staff team do anything right

  4. nice to see devirad plagiarizing half their laws from mine, real cool ;/

  5. RP is dead and we should convert to a factions server

  6. LT needs a complete re-wipe more than it has before.

    1. ski_king3

      ski_king3

      I think by definition this status is subjective.

    2. (See 2 other replies to this status update)

  7. Don't like tinfoil hats? Wanna talk about stupid D&D **** instead? Well hit me up and I'll add you to D&D club, since I messed up and had it made private instead of closed so I have to manually invite every person.

  8. I know ****'s blowing up right now, but if you like D&D at all, I made a D&D club. Anyone can join as long as you're genuinely interested, even if you think I'm ****.

    1. ski_king3

      ski_king3

      Well, I don't have any plans yet, but my hope was that folks could arrange games within the club if it gets enough traction.

    2. (See 7 other replies to this status update)

  9. I know ****'s blowing up right now, but if you like D&D at all, I made a D&D club. Anyone can join as long as you're genuinely interested, even if you think I'm ****.

  10. I'm done with these piece of **** oren white knights who just call pvp every ******* time I try to do anything even remotely aggresive just because they're too much of a ***** to fight an olog or anoyone with actual gear.

  11. Zero-sum lore policy: New races require the most unused race be locked. Same for magic?

  12. ya **** u for punishing people for breaking rules they agreed to follow

  13. Why was my RP post hidden?  

    1. ski_king3

      ski_king3

      You're not supposed to make threads about other people's characters dying. That's a pretty obvious one.

    2. (See 6 other replies to this status update)

  14. How many Aegis/Asulon vets are left active?

     

    Oct. '11, here. 

  15. If, according to Kanye West, one good girl is worth a thousand *******, and if, according to Lil Wayne, ******* come a dime a dozen, does that mean one good girl is worth $8.33? Well, $8.35 in Canada. In Thailand, $8.33 is about 275 Baht. 275 Baht will get you a skanky hooker in a Thai brothel. If you want a really good hooker, it'll cost you at least 2000 Baht, or about $61.00. So in Thailand a good woman is worth $61.00 or $732 a dozen. Yes. However to further this, according to 2Pac Mo' Money= Mo' ******* If you divide out Mo', you will see that money=******* Therefore, 1000 moneys= one good girl. To extrapolate further, diving with respect to "money" yields 1 money = $0.00833 This changes everything, because money isn't worth hardly anything. True. A linear relationship between money and ******* means the equation relating money to ******* is in the form of y=ax+b, where x is money and y is *******. Consulting the Lil Wayne theorem, if 12 ******* is worth $0.10, then one ***** is $0.0083. Therefore we know that the equation 1=a(.0083)+b must hold true and so must 12=a(.1)+b. To find the equation relating money to ******* must have "a" and "b" values which satisfy the two previous equations. Since "Mo'" implies a positive linear relation, we know "a" must be positive. I have done the math for you and found that a=119.96 and b=.0043. So, (*******)=119.96(Money) + .0043. To find the number of good girls you get from an amount of money, simply divide the number of ******* by 1000 (because of the Kanye West Theorem). No but biggie said mo' money= mo' problems so money=problems and since mo' money mo' *******, we can see that *******=problems Well one must first consult the "50 Cent Law": "Mo' Money, Mo' Problems". Here we see that the amount of money is proportionate to the number of problems. Then one must factor one of the basic rules of the "The Carter Theorem" : "I got 99 problem but a ***** ain't one". Here we see that without a "*****" the average person will have exactly 99 problems. Therefore the formula must be applied: (current amount of money) (8.33) / ln[(Problems100-1 ) * (current amount of money)]******* = worth of ***** Unfortunately this formula only tells us the value "a *****" which as we know is only worth one monies Therefore you must apply [(worth of *****) * (problems) * (money-8.33)] + 1 / 1000 = The value of a good girl Hope this helps Yeah. No. That's not how math works. 2pac was merely stating that the derivative of Money in terms of ******* is strictly positive. More-over, he skipped a lot of steps in his proof and never formally published the full version. I bet you believed Fermat's margins really were too small as well, right? Imperial ******* is actually a unit of weight. An imperial ***** is ~111.1111111112 pounds. Theres one fundamental law of math that Lil'Wayne forgot to include in his calculations. We have to follow the law of "******* ain't ****" theorized by doctor dre himself. With that principal included we can work out that if ******* aint ****, and a good girl is worth 1,000 *******, a good girl is still not worth ****. You're forgetting that Jay-Z published his paper on the "Money Ain't A Thang" theory. Therefore if ******* aren't worth **** then ******* aren't money and so therefore they ARE, in fact, a "Thang". Is that the transitive property of *******? Is it possible that for every *****, there is an equal and opposite good girl? That doesn't make sense though because kanye said a good girl is worth one thousand *******. The economics don't make sense. Newton or kanye is wrong. They cannot both apply their laws to ******* I think the important part here is, are we assuming that there is 1 good girl for every 1000 *******. This is a very scary thought. 1/1000 females is a good girl and the other 999 are *******. To me this would make my $8.33 a very good investment. I paid at least $3000 for my wife's wedding ring. Could I have bought 360 good girls in stead of 1 good girl? B/c I can't help but feel like I have overpaid for my good girl according to the genius of Kanye West and Little Weezy F. Baby. Don't get me wrong, I love my good girl wife, but I feel duped knowing she may have only been worth 8 bucks instead of 3000 It actually depends on they type of women. If it is a bakers daughter it is less since the sample size is actually larger I.E. a bakers dozen (13) so: (.10/13)x1000=$7.69 ...0r $9.69 Canadian (not counting the maple syrup) How much candy you can buy for $8.33? We can conclude that 1 ***** is worth approximately 0.83c, but since ******* are of negative value it's actually -0.83c. This means that in order to get the correct positive value of a good girl there needs to be an exponential factor involved here. In order to evaluate the amount of good girls needed to offset the ******* you use the simple formula -0.0083B2 = G. This intuitively makes sense when you think about how the more ******* you have around you the exponentially higher value even a single good girl has. So when B=1000 we get: G = -0.0083(1000)2 = $68.89 Interestingly enough, if the entire female population of the US, let's say 150 million for simplicity, were *******, the worth of one good girl would then be $1,550,025,000,000 which is just over the total USD currently in circulation.

  16. Anyone up for making a skin?

    1. ski_king3

      ski_king3

      i swear to god if you're not also volunteering...

    2. (See 3 other replies to this status update)

  17. Make me admin you fugnuggets.

  18. Let's rally darkies for next map. Big great tavern in middle of town. Strong military! Simple build!

    1. ski_king3

      ski_king3

      Warhawkes have been reasonably active this past week. Come on by, it's pretty fun.

    2. (See 12 other replies to this status update)

  19. "No more staff this time" - Ski_King3 2013-2017

×
×
  • Create New...