John Ivory

Could also be argued that "natural-born" in fact was defined, or that it did not need defining, because of the time period the Constitution was written in, and by the influence Common Law had on the Constitution itself. "Natural-born", used in the context it was, must have been written using the definition Common Law provides, which again is birth within a sovereign territory, because the natural-born clause was inserted into the Constitution in order to defend America from foreign influence anyway. There's a good quote somewhere by I believe Scalia, which states, "do not define that which is not defined" (in reference to the Constitution.)

I got scared this was an evolved shitpost,

your country is a joke