Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 120 views
-
-
- 2 replies
- 119 views
-
- 2 replies
- 90 views
-
- 2 replies
- 123 views
-
- 2 replies
- 150 views
-
- 2 replies
- 142 views
-
- 2 replies
- 93 views
-
- 2 replies
- 162 views
-
- 2 replies
- 210 views
-
- 2 replies
- 247 views
-
- 2 replies
- 255 views
-
- 2 replies
- 260 views
-
- 2 replies
- 225 views
-
- 2 replies
- 221 views
-
- 2 replies
- 208 views
-
- 2 replies
- 187 views
-
- 2 replies
- 211 views
-
- 2 replies
- 169 views
-
- 2 replies
- 190 views
-
- 2 replies
- 207 views
-
- 2 replies
- 149 views
-
- 2 replies
- 185 views
-
- 2 replies
- 161 views
-
- 2 replies
- 163 views
-
- 2 replies
- 163 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
