Changing My Vip Content [Ilegal Vs The Law]

[Robin Drake 731]

As the server changes and evolves, certain aspects and/or mechanics will also change. In order to embrace this, things have to change. For instance in Aegis you got a lump sum of minas for donating, which was later deemed as that needed changing; getting a large sum of minas from an ooc source didn't equate in rp.

 

Now, the staff are able to, as a team decide upon perks for donor packages if there is a feeling that certain perks are not working or if they are "out of date" and cause friction with the current structure of the map or the direction that it is planned to take. These choices are not made to spite donors. These are donations after all, despite what method you used when Availer was the owner it was still a 'donation'. Not to mention that the server has changed hands since then so obviously there will be differences.

 

Change is inevitable.

 

Edit: Also, you are double posting a lot, please make use of the  "Edit" button on your posts rather than adding a new comment with one sentence.

[nppeck 601]

 

ex·pire

ikˈspīr/

verb

gerund or present participle: expiring

1.

(of a document, authorization, or agreement) cease to be valid, typically after a fixed period of time.

 

NO way it means changing.

 

Exactly, the donation is no longer valid and thus it has changed. I would also like to question what change you are upset about exactly since no a ton has changed since that time. Care to explain what goods you were offering Availer? It doesn't matter how to paid for it, it's still a donation nonwithstanding. Legally it's still donating even it's its not currency. 

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

As the server changes and evolves, certain aspects and/or mechanics will also change. In order to embrace this, things have to change. For instance in Aegis you got a lump sum of minas for donating, which was later deemed as that needed changing; getting a large sum of minas from an ooc source didn't equate in rp.

 

Now, the staff are able to, as a team decide upon perks for donor packages if there is a feeling that certain perks are not working or if they are "out of date" and cause friction with the current structure of the map or the direction that it is planned to take. These choices are not made to spite donors. These are donations after all, despite what method you used when Availer was the owner it was still a donation. Not to mention that the server has changed hands since then so obviously there will be differences.

 

Change is inevitable.

I never agreed that my donation would change, it is not stated in the policy you agree when donating nor in the ToS. You are in the fault and I should have been noticed that my package would change in the late years.

 

I cannot sell anything on the server unless I make it IC. I had 4-7 shops well located in Aegis and Asulon that led me to a loss of Minas and interest in the server

 

Changes are inevitable but as a organisation you have to notice user when there is changes, when they do not agree they should get money back.

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

Exactly, the donation is no longer valid and thus it has changed. I would also like to question what change you are upset about exactly since no a ton has changed since that time. Care to explain what goods you were offering Availer? It doesn't matter how to paid for it, it's still a donation nonwithstanding. Legally it's still donating even it's its not currency. 

 

 

Expiring doesn't mean it will changes, it only mean that it is not valid anymore but there is no time period, so my donation is still valid so I should get access to the shop plugin.

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

For the 4th time, I never "donated". I payed for "goods and services" on paypal, legally , I never donated.

[nppeck 601]

Which law is this that states that you never donated?

[Space 2335]

Guys, he's trolling, he's been trolling in OOC all morning. Just let it die.

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

Which law is this that states that you never donated?

 

 

Because I paid as "goods and services" on paypal but not as a donation. Are you getting it after the 6th times OR NOT !

[nppeck 601]

Because I paid as "goods and services" on paypal but not as a donation. Are you getting it after the 6th times OR NOT !

Would you like to state this goods and services law then?

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

Guys, he's trolling, he's been trolling in OOC all morning. Just let it die.

 

You have been trolling me on the OOC channel all morning, I ignored you and I am in the right to open a strike report as I have proof of you.

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

Would you like to state this goods and services law then?

 

Good:

 

In economics, a good is a material that satisfies human wants and provides utility, for example, to a consumer making a purchase.

 

Service :

 

In economics, a service is an intangible commodity.

 

When paying for "goods and services" on paypal you do not donate, you pay for a good or a service.

 

In this situation, I paid for advantages on the server. I did not donate X ammount of money for a perk in exchange. I paid for them.

[nppeck 601]

 

Good:

 

In economics, a good is a material that satisfies human wants and provides utility, for example, to a consumer making a purchase.

 

Service :

 

In economics, a service is an intangible commodity.

 

When paying for "goods and services" on paypal you do not donate, you pay for a good or a service.

 

In this situation, I paid for advantages on the server. I did not donate X ammount of money for a perk in exchange. I paid for them.

 

That's not a law....

[CHARLES THE BALD 2616]

That's not a law....

 

 

You don't get it dude, you are 16 still too young for this.

[Bawd 222]

You don't get it dude, you are 16 still too young for this.

 

Are you capable of providing unambiguous, unfalsifiable evidence that you did not, in fact, make a donation?

[Robin Drake 731]

I never agreed that my donation would change, it is not stated in the policy you agree when donating nor in the ToS. You are in the fault and I should have been noticed that my package would change in the late years.

 

I cannot sell anything on the server unless I make it IC. I had 4-7 shops well located in Aegis and Asulon that led me to a loss of Minas and interest in the server

 

Changes are inevitable but as a organisation you have to notice user when there is changes, when they do not agree they should get money back.

 

For the 4th time, I never "donated". I payed for "goods and services" on paypal, legally , I never donated.

 

Firstly use the multiquote and edit options to prevent double and triple posting, forum etiquette 101.

 

Now, despite what you think, we do announce changes to our donation system and users do give feedback on the changes. Albeit not via a mass email notification. Giving the option for players to claim back their donations is ridiculous. They are donations to the server, to help aid its development and keep it online. Your case is an anomaly. 

 

From your comments and manner of writing, it seems that what you are annoyed at is the fact you can no longer use the shop plugin, meaning you actually have to rp selling items rather than creating autoshops and going to do other things. You are also pushing the fact that you "payed for perks" rather than donating. Despite what guise you put forth, it is merely a mask for what you did, which was donating. Call it what you will but you willingly parted with your money to receive the perks for donators . You donated your money. We have no obligation to return this money.