Mister Pandan bring back this thread

[Jonificus 2761]

Alright admins, now ya done it. Why did you remove Mitto's thread? Perfectly good feedback without a pinch of inflammatory remarks or anything against the rules. You keep talking about wanting to improve communication but you got this horrible complex where you cut down any dissidence that puts up a good argument. No wonder the relations between players and staff is so poor, you reap what you sow.

 

Now, back to my point, bring back the thread. I doubt a FM went rogue and took down the thread without some commands from the higher ups so please do bring this **** back.

Rant over.

 

When it comes crashing down, and it hurts inside,

ya' gotta take a stand, it don't help to hide,

Well, you hurt my friend, and you hurt my pride,

I gotta be a man; I can't let this slide.

 

Edited June 13, 2016 by Jonificus

[HeroOfDuLoc 1935]

why?

[AGP 3169]

Administration showing their cards. This department business is a sham. We've taken one step sideways and five steps back.

[Space 2335]

I would assume it's something to do with Mitto being a GM and not just 'blatant' censorship. More like 'why didn't you talk about this in gm chat or something'

 

but even if that's the case, pretty shitty

[Jonificus 2761]

Just now, 9___9 {Thomas} said:

-snip-

Last time I checked I found out that feedback is the input from others on certain events or decisions. You shouldn''t be able to brush certain feedback aside because it doesn't pat your back enough. Y'know, sometimes things are just pure **** without any redeeming qualities, kinda like the situation at hand right now.

[mmat 7460]

9_____9

[AGP 3169]

7 minutes ago, 9___9 {Thomas} said:

-snip-

True though a post saying "This change isn't actually a change" isn't really feedback so much as pointing out that the propaganda is ineffective.

[Aesopian 1640]

the staff teams sure do love deleting huge amounts of information from threads

 

if there's ever an admin or gm who runs on a platform of NEVER deleting ANY post which has even a single IOTA of decent information in it, I would ABSOLUTELY support them

[AGP 3169]

Just now, 9___9 {Thomas} said:

Most certainly, though there are other ways to handle that in a way which may actually be effective in the long run. Generally complaining about a matter in a faux-feedback sense publicly when more direct and proficient avenues can be explored isn't advised. 

Mitto's thread did make a point, though a subtle one, which was surmised in his closing statement.

[Corvoo 562]

Staff really need to get their **** together. Was an easily avoidable mess, honestly. 

[Elad™ 560]

Moved to the Archive. It shall be sorted into the appropriate category shortly.