HARJALAINEN VS THE TREASURY

[frill 2277]

 

Spoiler

thread theme btw;

 

HARJALAINEN V. THE IMPERIAL TREASURY (Carrington et al.)

 

SIR VEIKKO HARJALAINEN,
Represented pro se,
 

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT;

 
THE IMPERIAL TREASURY

 

WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT PARTIES;

 

Green Carrington,

 

Peter Sarkozy,

 

Lt. Dax Illiquin,

Sir Adrian Roussard,

Gen. Alren DeNurem,

Mary Philippa D’Arkent-Carrington,

Theodore Mane.

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

304.031 - Private documents shall have the same value as a deed between those who executed it and their successors.

 

304.012 - Obligations arise from law and contract.

 

304.022 - If a person obliged to do something has not done it, it is ordered to be done at his expense.

 

204.0101 - Where an individual intentionally or negligently fails to abide by the terms of a written or verbal contract, misleads regarding its terms, or provides insufficient

consideration for its completion, to the detriment of another, and this detriment is of great amounts, this shall be fraud in the first degree. (Class P)

 

305.052 - No contracts shall be rescinded as a result of injury, unless the injury is a result of a fraudulent contract.

 

202.061 - Where an individual knowingly disseminates false information about an individual, without intent to harm the reputation of that individual, this shall be defamation in the third degree. (Class E)

 

FACTS

 

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

 

BREACH OF CONTRACT

 

1. Drafted by the Treasury, 13th of Harren’s Folly, 1754, the Imperial Reserve was established by the Peter Sarkozy (Hereafter Sarkozy), then treasurer of the empire, and Sir Veikko Harjalainen (Hereafter Harjalainen), with the following competency;

 

 “5% of two saint week’s finalized sum (deposited from the Imperial treasury’s fluctuating finances) shall be kept to the Imperial Reserve, to be used in cases of national emergency or when proposed by a congregation of the Council of State.”

 

2. This competency was affirmed within THE IMPERIAL DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY BI-ANNUAL REPORT, As issued the 16th of the DEEP COLD, 1756, wherein the then-Deputy Secretary of the Treasury did  state;

 

As an organisation aimed to uphold the integrity of the Imperial treasury, it shall be tasked with accumulating a 10% amount of the bi-yearly treasury income

 

3. These establish proof of contract between Veikko Harjalainen, named as ‘Warden of the Reserve’ and the Imperial Treasury (no person specifically named, thus the seat of office being the contracting party) as per 304.012.

 

4. Following the resignation of Peter Sarkozy from position as Secretary of the Treasury no such payments were made; see ledger.

 

EXTORTION

 

1. The Reserve and The Imperial Loan Office functioned symbiotically, see article titled “Imperial Loan Office (IT) Est. 1761”, wherein it states “Loan can be made out in the form of Minas or through Imperial Reserve Notes.”

 

2. These loans drew from the Imperial Reserve and not the treasury.

 

3. The Imperial Reserve loaned over fifteen thousand minae, with ten thousand to Dax Illiquin, Lieutenant of the Imperial State Army.

 

4. On dismissal from office Carrington approached Harjalainen with multiple armed persons, including Gen. DeNurem, to recover paid “funds” with full knowledge that through both Harjalainen being forced to run the Reserve from his own pocket and the loans department sanctioned by Carrington, that such money simply did not exist.

 

5. This is further evidenced by THE CROWN v. SIR VEIKKO HARJALAINEN wherein no evidence is produced to substantiate any claim made, standing as 202.061 defamation of the first degree due to there being no factual basis of the accused infringements of law.  

 

6. Referring to the Plaintiff’s own money as “stolen” is a legal conclusion and therefore dissemination of false information.

 

II.  RELEVANT IMPERIAL LAW AND PRACTICE

 

304.031 Stands as relevant imperial law due to the implication of successors as signatories, should Carrington claim that the Treasury-Harjalainen contract was interpersonally instead of between the office of the Treasury and Harjalainen.

 

304.012 Stands as relevant due to the contract between the Treasury and Harjalainen stipulating an obligation of 5% of the imperial revenue over a biannual period to be paid into the reserve.

 

304.022 Stands as relevant due to the unfulfilled obligation of the Treasury.

 

204.0101 Stands as relevant due to the Treasury negligently failing to abide by the terms of the Treasury-Harjalainen contract, further providing insufficient consideration for its completion to the detriment of Harjalainen. Due to these being over 10 000 minae, it is to be considered great amounts.

 

305.052 Stands as relevant Imperial Law as the contract between the two parties was rescinded due to perceived injury by Carrington.

 

202.061 Stands as relevant Imperial Law as Carrington published legal conclusions without any authority to do so, misrepresenting Harjalainen with no evidentiary basis.

 

DISCOVERY

 

1. The Plaintiff wishes the court to be provided with ledgers to establish the nonpayment by the treasury following the dismissal of Sarkozy.

 

1. The Plaintiff wishes the court to be provided with the evidence substantiating Carrington’s “theft of 50,000 Imperial Marks” claim.

 

1. The Plaintiff wishes the court to be provided with the evidence substantiating the “None of these marks were received by the Treasury.” claim.

 

DAMAGES

 

The plaintiff seeks damages for the period of his tenure as Warden of the Imperial Reserve from 1754 to 1763. In respect of pecuniary damage, he seeks 10 000 Imperial Marks for loss of personal finances due to the mismanagement by Carrington, which sum represented a rate of 1112 Imperial Marks per annum over that period of nine years. 

 

***

 

 

[argonian 14254]

“For the sake of public trust in the judiciary, I do sure hope this case is taken on by a judge who doesn’t have own a significant portion of Carrington Co.” Conrad remarks.

[FlemishSupremacy 6115]

“Spicy.” Said a certain entrepreneuring Mali, hearing about this development from across the sea! He’d surely follow this case with great interest.

[monkeypoacher 8055]

“Huh.” Former treasury undersecretary, now-investigator Porphyre Nicephore murmured, pinning a copy of the summons to the corkboard above his desk.