Jump to content

Request for Judicial Review: Second Lemonade Legal Reforms Bill (1776)


yopplwasupxxx

Recommended Posts

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

 

CONRAD BARCLAY

As Represented by LEONARD VAN HALEN

 

DESIRES TO SEE THE LEGAL CONTEXT OF THE FOLLOWING REVIEWED

 

SECOND LEMONADE LEGAL REFORMS BILL (1776)

 

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

The Second Lemonade Legal Reforms Bill (1776) is a legislative bill recently passed by the House of Commons and the House of Lords though pending crown ascent (by the time of writing of this request). Within this bill, the articles legislate by removing pre-existing ORC statutes ORC 702.04 (“The right to organize a force of armed men within their estates, to train and fit their militia as seen fit, and to protect their estates with their militia.”) and ORC 703.05 (“The duty to maintain a force of five-hundred soldiers of foot if the baronial rank, a force of one thousand soldiers of foot if the comital rank, a force of two thousand soldiers of foot if the ducal rank, and a force of four thousand soldiers of foot if of the princely or royal rank.”) and adding a chapter ORC 410 and detailing a statute ORC 410.01 in regards to militias.

 

It is the opinion of the party of Conrad Barclay, as represented by Leonard van Halen, that this bill is an overreach and in violation of the Oren Revised Code, including the Edict of Reform (1763) and subsequent acts and/or edicts, and therefore not a valid bill. In support of this opinion, the requesting party brings forth the following principle(s), order(s), and/or legislation,

 

I - THE IMPERIAL DIET CANNOT PASS LEGISLATION REGARDING THE MILITARY AND MILITIAS

 

As per ORC 602.04, the Imperial Diet is limited in its functions to pass certain bills and legislation in regards to areas where the Crown retains executive privilege. This includes “the military” (ORC 602.041). It is the opinion of the requesting party that because the Second Lemonade Legal Reforms Bill (1776) changes stipulations regarding how militaries and militias are organized by the Crown, provinces, and peer estates, this bill is in violation with 602.04 and not in line with the legal limitations of the Imperial Diet.

 

The party of Conrad Barclay seeks to have the Second Lemonade Reforms Bill (1776) considered null and void due to the illegality of its articles.

 

YOURS HUMBLY,

LEONARD SKINGAARD VAN HALEN

3 Main St, Johnstown, Northland, Oren

[[yoppl the tarchar#5195]]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...