SELM V. HELVETS

[BenevolentManacles 2232]

EDWARD SELM

    Represented by HIMSELF

   

    DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;

    ADRIAN HELVETS

 

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

202.083 - Where an individual disseminates false information about an individual, with intent to harm the reputation of that individual, in a public space or by distribution of printed materials, this shall be defamation in the first degree, a misdemeanor.

 

Adrian Helvets was witnessed placing down a sign in the middle of a Court Case, THE CROWN V NAPIER.  The sign said “EDWARD SELM IS A BLACKMAILER THAT THREATENS PEOPLE.” He was ejected by the Honorable Lady Vimmark, the presiding Justice, for his act.

 

Several more of these signs were placed throughout the City of Helena with the exact same text, and so it is excruciatingly obvious that these signs were promoted by him.

 

 

 

WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT PARTY OR PARTIES:

 

N/A

   

    ON THE DESIRED DATE OF:

    [[PENDING DISCUSSION WITH THE CIRCUIT COURT]

 

YOURS HUMBLY,

 EDWARD SELM 

  THE SELM ESTATE

    [KP#3486]]

 

[Draeris 3124]

 

 

“Well then.” Adrian would clasp his hands. 

[sergisala 3451]

THE CENTRAL CIRCUIT COURT

1^st of Godfrey’s Triumph, 1789

 

In accordance with the Legal Procedure Act of 1772, Sir Edward Galbraith, Justice of the Central Circuit Court, does duly assign himself to these proceedings. Accordingly, the assigned Justice shall meet with the Plaintiff and the Defendant in order to review the merits of the case and decide if the matter shall be allowed to proceed to trial.

 

The following parties are to contact Justice Galbraith to arrange a suitable date to present themselves before the Court:

 

- The Plaintiff Edward Selm [@BenevolentManacles] and/or his representative. If he cannot afford the employment of a Solicitor of his own, he is to respond as such and be assigned one by the Court.

 

– The Defendant Adrian Othodoric Helvets [@Draeris] and/or his representative. If he cannot afford the employment of a Solicitor of his own, he is to respond as such and be assigned one by the Court.

 

The following parties are required to perform the following actions for the sake of procedure:

 

- The Plaintiff is to designate a Solicitor of his own to represent him before the Court as it is our opinion that a pro se legal representation could lack the essential guarantees of a proper criminal proceeding before the Imperial Courts.

 

- The Defendant is to present to the Court a Replying Affidavit at least one saint day before the time of the trial, outlining their responses to the alleged crime.

 

- Both parties are reminded that Books of Evidence are to be exchanged at least one saint day before the trial is to occur.

 

Signed,

The Rt. Hon. Justice of the Central Circuit

Sir Edward Galbraith KM J.D. SSE.

[Sergi#5457]

[sergisala 3451]

THE CENTRAL CIRCUIT COURT

2^nd of Godfrey’s Triumph, 1789

 

After carefully reviewing the Summons filed by Mr. Edward Selm [@BenevolentManacles], herein the Plaintiff, the Court has decided to suspend this proceeding until the Plaintiff removes all the criminal charges from these Summons and instead files a civil suit, given that only “the Imperial Government or a Provincial Government may summon an individual before the Court on criminal charges by submitting a Subpoena” (Section III.2.a of the Legal Procedure Act of 1772).

 

Signed,

The Rt. Hon. Justice of the Central Circuit

Sir Edward Galbraith KM J.D. SSE.

[Sergi#5457]