Jump to content

Summons: Cooper v. Irwys


MCVDK

Recommended Posts

ykmzFqUT-n4rhkaQkDsiZCaqgZ5FOO2kqo6g5JR9x5isLCIKN4ZMVGME99uPb3EbLDDzNGlfPFWgun_3h1eXhLkH7sp2ccw-PbN_v5BbGzcd17ysIIkbDAdFMuF8fQr_QTUKfGyd

COOPER v. IRWYS

22nd of Harren’s Folley, 1827

DoTS4y2Pu0QBLKuXmcWmMzZ-t4AX1fNDLRgncBwb7nC1eEElLG50EyuyaAmmh4K-ckm9Ww7xKZjl9kwEq-gGXyiBU19r93Wpm-vjnJJZJ-DqiJzpHUt1Yije3rgGUjJyIyhqrM2x

IbnyfSy3y_xRF1AONt6cLjOpUBDkDReGGRBNs6cz547Bm55DL_b8AKhBNCMgCZX7zcVROPaRTplit-Md98xQlYrx_6BrlOxOXegLc9s0zo38qcYG11G4gA25z2J-Ikv9To9zxl3k

The Plaintiff ARLO COOPER,

Represented by DEMITRIYUS WILLIAM AUBERT of AUBERT LEGAL CO.,

With co-counsel GWYNEVERE COLBORN of AUBERT LEGAL CO.,

   

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;

                TINNIAN IRWYS

ykmzFqUT-n4rhkaQkDsiZCaqgZ5FOO2kqo6g5JR9x5isLCIKN4ZMVGME99uPb3EbLDDzNGlfPFWgun_3h1eXhLkH7sp2ccw-PbN_v5BbGzcd17ysIIkbDAdFMuF8fQr_QTUKfGyd

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

206.03A - Where an individual intentionally acts in unusual or unaccepted standards, especially in social or political behavior, this shall be the crime of deviancy, an infraction. 

Orenian Revised Code, CH206 ‘On Injury against Morality’

 

207.05A - Where an individual intentionally and deliberately hinders or interrupts the common peace by embellished performance or immoral behavior, this shall be the crime of disturbing the peace, an infraction. 

Orenian Revised Code, CH207 ‘On Injury against Order’

 

209.02A - Where an individual intentionally incites or encourages another individual into committing a crime, this shall be the crime of incitement, and is subject to the same class of punishment of the crime which incitement is caused for. 

Orenian Revised Code, CH209 ‘On Inchoate Offenses’

 

(i) An Imperial subject may submit a Petition for Summons to the Court to summon another entity with legal personality, including governmental agencies of the Crown but not the Crown itself, on civil charges;

(iA) All civil charges shall be based within the three civil damages, wherein one of the three is required to be present within the civil charges, these damages shall be;

(iAiii) Social Damages, to the reputation and standing of the individual;

(iB) All laws of the Orenian Revised Code are allowed to be pursued within a civil case, including those of Lex Criminalis, are one of the three damages present within the charges presented; 

Orenian Revised Code, CH614 ‘Legal Procedure Act’


 

    The Plaintiff, Arlo Cooper, henceforth referred to as the Plaintiff [alternatively Mr. Cooper], as represented by Demitriyus W. Aubert, henceforth referred to as Mr. Aubert, Solicitor of Aubert Legal Co., has recently suffered multiple injuries and damages in relation to the events of the following document. It has been seen fit by the Plaintiff, as counseled and represented by Mr. Aubert, to sue the Defendant, Tinnian Irwys, henceforth referred to as the Defendant [alternatively Miss Irwys] for the injuries caused through the legal breachment of the above denoted articles of law, as presented within the Orenian Revised Code, henceforth referred to as the ORC; therein the Plaintiff, as represented by Mr. Aubert, presents the following affidavit to the Circuit Court and the Defendant as an explanation of the charges presented within this document. 

 

    The Plaintiff, as represented by Demitriyus W. Aubert, claims to have strolled into the Novellen, which is clarified as the center tavern of the Providence District, wherein the Defendant had been within discussion with other individuals of the denoted tavern. The Defendant is seen to have been, in methods of incitement, gawking directly towards the Plaintiff in which the Plaintiff had queried as to the reason for this noticeable stare. In return, the Defendant insulted and thereafter smirked towards the Plaintiff in a similar mannerism of incitement as denoted within the above section. 

 

    Whereas, the Plaintiff, as represented by Demitriyus W. Aubert, recognizes for his own misdeeds within the confrontation with one another, as well as the Plaintiff belief that such action should be denoted within the discussion of the verdict from the honourable judge on this case; it is the belief of the Plaintiff that the incitement utilised from the Defendant, as well as the methods found to disturb the current calm within the tavern, not to mention the unacceptable social standard utilised in the situation, and the lack of attention which the Ministry of Justice has denoted towards the Defendant, that this case deserves to the reach the Circuit Courts as to show the nature and effects of civil rights and civil laws within our Imperial lands.  

 

AS A RESULT OF SUCH, THE PLAINTIFF WISHES: 

It is the opinion of the Plaintiff, as represented by Mr. Aubert, that the damages caused within the events described in the above paragraphs shall be returned in form of monetary remittance, as determined by the Judge presiding over the case, as well as a document, noted within the final verdict of the Court, which offers a written amende honorable, as a form of compensation to the multiple injuries, which will be listed beneath this section, caused to the Plaintiff. 

 

The Plaintiff, as represented by Demitriyus W. Aubert, has suffered the following injuries or damages, in reference to the initial confrontation between the parties, as well as the scenario which followed: 

(i) The Plaintiff has been publicly compromised (Social Damage)

(ii) The Plaintiff has been threatened with Court Martial, which results in dischargement from the Imperial State Army (Social and Financial Damage) 

 

IbnyfSy3y_xRF1AONt6cLjOpUBDkDReGGRBNs6cz547Bm55DL_b8AKhBNCMgCZX7zcVROPaRTplit-Md98xQlYrx_6BrlOxOXegLc9s0zo38qcYG11G4gA25z2J-Ikv9To9zxl3k

WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT PARTY OR PARTIES:

 

    DAME VIKTORIYA I

    EDWIN DE SARKOZY

    ADRIAN DE SARKOZY

     

 

    ON THE DESIRED DATE OF:

    [[DATE OF TRIAL / PENDING DISCUSSION WITH DEFENDANT]

 

YOURS HUMBLY,

    DEMITRIYUS W. AUBERT on behalf of ARLO COOPER,

    AUBERT LEGAL CO., PROVIDENCE & KAROSGRAD

    [[MCVDK#9258]]

 

YOURS HUMBLY,

    GWYNEVERE COLBORN on behalf of ARLO COOPER,

    AUBERT LEGAL CO., PROVIDENCE & KAROSGRAD

    [[Rae#3015]]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upon reading the summons, the Baron Halcourt would send a letter to Aubert Legal Co. 

 

"Mr. Aubert, 

  I could not help but to see that on your witnesses list that you have summoned Dame Viktoriya I to appear before the Courts. As is prescribed in the Ruling on the Crown v. Tsecsar, the Dame is not permitted entry to the Empire, lest she will receive additional criminal charges with further reparations. This said, I suggest that you re-file your summons with a correction to be made to the witnesses list.

Sincerely,

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, The Baron Halcourt J.D. SSE SCJ"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...