[Magic Lore - Amendment] Transfiguration Amendment

[E__V__O 1984]

Amendments

Alter Position

Including two separate redlines, which has no added benefit other than flavour, promotes RP engagement and interactivity, especially when performing mundane tasks. Do note, this cannot be done in combat.

Add Redlines:

- “The caster is able to perform separate **transmutation or enchanting** spells while alter position is active.”

 

- “The caster is able to utilise this spell on multiple objects as long as they don’t accumulate a weight of 25lbs/~11kg in total.”

 

Purpose:

The past attempt at pushing this addition through, was denied due to the ST not wanting for it to be used in combat. To iterate, the spell is non-combat only on the main transfiguration page and stated so. The second was due to not having accumulate weight in total. Both have been addressed.

 

Citation:

 

[SaviourMeme 690]

Is the second redline not already encompassed by this redline from the lore, seems a little redundant.

 

- Objects beyond 25lbs/~11kg may not be lifted via Alter Position collectively. That being said, incredibly particulate substances such as sand may not be lifted in large amounts more than a few grains. One may be able to cause rain around them to miraculously deflect off their attire, but throwing large globs of water is not a feasible task.

[E__V__O 1984]

Just now, SaviourMeme said:

Is the second redline not already encompassed by this redline from the lore, seems a little redundant.

 

- Objects beyond 25lbs/~11kg may not be lifted via Alter Position collectively. That being said, incredibly particulate substances such as sand may not be lifted in large amounts more than a few grains. One may be able to cause rain around them to miraculously deflect off their attire, but throwing large globs of water is not a feasible task.

 

It isn't explicitly stated that you can lift multiple objects, such as a teapot and teacups as example. The only reference to multiple instances is lifting more than a few grains. This is supposed to amend such.

[SaviourMeme 690]

16 minutes ago, Jenny_Bobbs said:

 

It isn't explicitly stated that you can lift multiple objects, such as a teapot and teacups as example. The only reference to multiple instances is lifting more than a few grains. This is supposed to amend such.

It is 
- Objects beyond 25lbs/~11kg may not be lifted via Alter Position collectively. That being said, incredibly particulate substances such as sand may not be lifted in large amounts more than a few grains. One may be able to cause rain around them to miraculously deflect off their attire, but throwing large globs of water is not a feasible task.

 

Look at the altered text, "Objects" (plural) beyond 25lbs/~11kg may not be lifted via Alter Position "collectively". Meaning that as a collective all the objects do not exceed above 25lbs/~11kg. Also literally seen in the example where it says you can move multiple particles of sand at once, or keep multiple raindrops from hitting you. 

 

[E__V__O 1984]

7 minutes ago, SaviourMeme said:

It is 
- Objects beyond 25lbs/~11kg may not be lifted via Alter Position collectively. That being said, incredibly particulate substances such as sand may not be lifted in large amounts more than a few grains. One may be able to cause rain around them to miraculously deflect off their attire, but throwing large globs of water is not a feasible task.

 

Look at the altered text, "Objects" (plural) beyond 25lbs/~11kg may not be lifted via Alter Position "collectively". Meaning that as a collective all the objects do not exceed above 25lbs/~11kg. Also literally seen in the example where it says you can move multiple particles of sand at once, or keep multiple raindrops from hitting you.

 

 

Here was the reason it did get denied. So it seems not only I did we miss that but also the ST.

 

Oh well.

[ronin_champloo 5951]

I hate jennybobbs he literally does so much bad stuff ew ew ew he powergames and loopholes I despise him.

plz rep this comment if ur an ST who dislikes Jennybobbs and will hit it with a 'deny' bcuz he wrote it, ty

+1

[IsaaKc 1225]

On 4/2/2022 at 1:09 AM, Jenny_Bobbs said:

 

Here was the reason it did get denied. So it seems not only I did we miss that but also the ST.

 

Oh well.

dude who the hell made this feedback what

 

i didn't know housemagery had a monopoly on the complex and elite concept of moving objects out of combat for flavor

 

this is even funnier once you realize that housemagery was adapted from noncombative domestic voidal magic. any of the housemagery spells that were adapted from domestic voidal magic should be easily possible in the hands of any mage.

 

to the LT that wrote this, as the author of the currently accepted tfig lore, this was 100% the intention of that red line. i only put a limit on the weight as to further emphasize on the spell being noncombative (e.g. so you can't throw around swords and the like)

 

whoever wrote this feedback clearly had to come up w/ some sort of reason to vote a N strictly because they don't like voidal amendments or clarifications

 

like yeah dude i hate Jenny's MArts too but man, its too funny that this was used as an actual reason for denial

Edited April 5, 2022 by IsaaKc

[Kalehart 1061]

Amendments/Additions implemented into main lore post. Thank you for your submission. Moving to correct subforum to prevent redundancy and clutter.