Volutional

This topic is hereby locked, and moved to inactive guilds. The truth is, you're not allowed to plagiarize at all on this server. Sure, inspiration. But blatant copy and pasting, editing and distributing is against copyright in most forms of creative media, and such is the same with books, and the television series. The whole concept is copied, not based, on the Night's Watch from A Song of Ice and Fire, and because of this you cannot continue to post about it on the forums as it may cause some discontent with the owners of this work, or even the players whom adore the series itself. If you would like to remake this guild, I suggest you go back upon your concept and rework it in a definitely original manner. Edit; I would also like to remind players to contact FMs, GMs or Admins when thinking to post OOCly on a guild topic that is controversial such as this.

[ Please don't anger George RR Martin, he'll kill more Starks. Anyways. It's best you didn't blatantly copy the NIght's Watch. ]

I don't really mind how it was back in the middle ages, I was simply referring to it in hope I wouldn't be watered on because I mentioned them. Clearly I did. ;) Horses should be given to Nations, and those who want one will have to go to a Nation and barter for one. Why just be given one? That makes little sense. Those who RP horses barely RP buying them. So you can simply force people to actually buy them, or have Nations to what they wish. Which would be buying or handing out, or keeping and banning. It's up to the Nations that way. Players could buy one for their farm in the wilds, to increase RP. Or wherever they have a farm, or whatever they are doing with a horse. Bottom line is. If the GMs are sitting there controlling horses, players who don't want half-genuine GM role-play will be disappointed. Like myself. I'd prefer to buy a horse from somebody who has actually RP'd their way to getting to sell them. Not a GM who poofs them into existence. Sorry for le bluntness, in advance.

In the middle ages, I'm pretty certain a peasant could buy one for a discount in certain circumstances, such as using it as a work horse for his trading carts. Nations should be permitted to build stables, and have a character of their Nation be assigned a side role, permanant role, what have you, as a stable-master. This way, we can have more affective Nation role-play which enhances trade in said Nation, and variety. If a character doesn't like the fact they can't get a Horse in his / her nation, they can trade with another for one. Prices will then be variable, and sometimes provided as gifts to other nations, that sort of thing.

If I see one more harsh comment passed by GM, player or some kind of mutation of the two, I shall be pursuing the correct function to bring justice to them. I won't allow our forums to contain abusive behavior or slander.

"Better to be the King whom knelt, than the King whom melt." Says a spontaneous peasantry.

Would you sacrifice the child of Catelyn Stark for the head of Joffrey Baratheon?